DL Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 I suddenly got a crazy idea. What if threads with fake types in them had to have some sort of tag, such as [Fake Type] next to the title, and there be a rule added that any thread following that tag rule must be rated fairly, and threads with fake types, but no fake type tag, can be rated down, or locked, or whatever. Now, before you decide, think about the points from both sides. If you like fake types:1. They'll be rated fairly2. You can meet more people that share an interest in fake types. If you don't like fake types: 1. You can simply ignore the thread. It might die.2. It'll control the amount of fake types out there, since some people don't like the little extra effort it takes to rememebr to add [Fake type] to the thread title. Supporters:Darklink401TomterkovDeustododfgk101Xionjk233_ultimatemasterWhite Hollowkeybladespartan.:Shaymin:. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 I'm in the FK, but no support. As you yourself said, it curbs the number of Fake Types. It also discriminates against them. Fake Types are supposed to be treated equally and fairly, not picketed so people can CHOOSE not to rate them. Would you like it if you had to post [Pyro/Effect] at the beginning of everything thread title in Custom Cards? Then why would you wish the same on Fake Types? That's the calmest rant I've ever posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Actually, I think you can just write [Fake Types] in the title... No support, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 With time, I' sure the tag system would vanish, and fake types might eb accepted regularly... but yeah, I can see the problems (AKA< a bit more hard work) But, if someone weite [Fake Types] in the title, then peopel can still go there JUST to rate it down, if they dislike fake types. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Yes, you might have a point with that. But I still think it can be too complicated, but if this will be made in a good and problemless way, I'll support to keep the Fake-Types living and fairly treated for/by the ones who like the cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 yeah, it just sounds overly complicated. ^_^' But it's actually quite simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deustodo Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 I'll support this tag thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-SupernovA- Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Treating fake types fairly is more like a unspoken "rule". I say it like that because it's a more of a courtesy to look past the fake types and judge the rest of the card without bias. Either way, putting a tag in your threads isn't going to stop people who don't like fake types from posting, and neither will making an uneeded rule. No support sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Home Slice Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Well it gets annoying when I tell people fake typs are bad (I'm not a Fake type person) so i'll support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aero~ Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Support. Great idea. I'm sick of saying "Fake types are bad." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 ^Me too and I support^I don't have a problem with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeno bell Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 HAVE FUN WITH THAT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted March 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 HAVE FUN WITH THAT I don't get it... Anyway, thank you for all who support it, As for those of you who don't, I do see your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Hollow Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 I'll support this tag thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KeyBladeSpartan Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 i will support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted March 26, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 Awesome, 8 supporters already! ^_^ I should add it to the thread title before I lose count. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Shaymin:. Posted March 26, 2010 Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 I support but I am not liking it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted March 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 ? So you support an idea you don't like? Which means you do find it useful nontherless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.