• F.U - Cyber Tri Dragon | F.U - Ender Scarab | Fall Destruction •

[Wuu.]

[align=center]F.U- or Fall Union is a set of Machine-Type monsters that require 1, 2 or 3, including 1 Tribute needed to Summon it, and can in turn deliver effects that range from nuking to gaining an upper hand in just the Battle Phase.

I will be working on more cards soon

 

 

When this card is Summoned you must destroy 1 monster you control. Once per turn you can decrease the Level of this card by 1 and decrease the DEF and ATK by 500. When this card is destroyed for each turn the controller of this card activated this card's effect you can destroy 1 monster your opponent controls on the field.

 

[/align]

[Quiksilver]

Hmm...Interesting effects, except Fall Destruction. What is the point of that card? Also, I feel you could do more with the idea, so I look forward to seeing more Fall Union cards. Great pics. Were did you get them?

 

GRADE

9/10 For Originality

6/10 For Playability

10/10 For OCG

10/10 For Relevant Pics /4 =8.75/10

[-Griffin]

First card:

UP'd - cite BEWD. a 2900 'stick isn't that threatening when you lose 2 cards to get it.

Second card:

UP'd - cite Monarchs. They survive longer and run over a lot and this guy would have to be very lucky to get extra removal and requires 2 monsters lost to tribute or 1 if Special'd, 1 less than a monarch ever would. Zaborg beats this, and he isn't run.

Third card:

OP'd - cite sense. Smashing was only just let off the list, MST still isn't off. Both in one with added choice on Smashing's part is clearly OP'd.

[Wuu.]

First card:

UP'd - cite BEWD. a 2900 'stick isn't that threatening when you lose 2 cards to get it. Ya' date=' kinda[/b']

Second card:

UP'd - cite Monarchs. They survive longer and run over a lot and this guy would have to be very lucky to get extra removal and requires 2 monsters lost to tribute or 1 if Special'd, 1 less than a monarch ever would. Zaborg beats this, and he isn't run. Mmh...

Third card:

OP'd - cite sense. Smashing was only just let off the list, MST still isn't off. Both in one with added choice on Smashing's part is clearly OP'd. WUT

 

Bad idea?

[Quiksilver]

The third card, yes. You should have just left it out.

[ragnarok1945]

Fall Destruction is way too bland, though balanced out. I wished you gave it another effect though

 

Tri Cyber Dragon I was hoping for more than just atk gains

 

but still, you did well for the cards, the balance is there, so I'll give it 8.6/10

[Wuu.]

BUMP

[RAEGING D0GKING]

Fall Destruction is a bit op.

It should say discard 1 card.

Love the idea.

9.5/10 because the spell is op.

[Wuu.]

TBH i don't see how Fall Destruction is oped =/

[Wuu.]

BUMPING DA GOOSE

[flyingtoastr]

TBH i don't see how Fall Destruction is oped =/

 

Look at the other 1-for-1 destruction spells and traps.

 

MST has been Limited pretty much since the day it came out. DT requires you to set it for a turn before you can use it. Nobleman only targets face-downs and was also semi-limited for a very long time. Smashing and Fissure are confined to psudo-targeting only specific monsters. Offerings to the Doomed forces you to give up your Draw Phase.

 

I could go on. The point is that a 1-for-1 with absolutely no strings attached would be limited so fast your head would spin.

[Wuu.]

As far as i know Raigeki is OPed, this seems just balanced to me.

Alas, it's just me =/

[Cloister]

It is a Normal Spell, makes it less OPed if you think about it. But it is still too strong. Would be at least Limited.

 

The monsters look fine. But I can see it being troublesome getting them out..

[Wuu.]

It's supposed to be high tribute, high power.

[-Griffin]

Unfortunately, it's not that high power.

[Wuu.]

Lol yeah. =/

[Cloister]

First card requires 2 monsters on the field already to be Summoned since 1 you will have to destroy anyway.

As for the second one...

These would rely on swarming the field very heavily or just constantly controlling at least 2 monsters.