Toffee. Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Aren't you glad Starlight Road is a thing?Jar Robber exists.So lets unban Pot of Greed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Jar Robber exists. So lets unban Pot of Greed. I'm not saying it justifies the existence of cards like this, but instead of whining about a card I can't prevent being made I'm gonna play around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 I'm not saying it justifies the existence of cards like this, but instead of whining about a card I can't prevent being made I'm gonna play around it. Well I'm gonna play around it and discuss how stupid its design it at the same time. Muktitasking bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Is there any card that can activate its effect twice in the same chain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Is there any card that can activate its effect twice in the same chain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Well I'm gonna play around it and discuss how stupid its design it at the same time. Muktitasking bro. Yes, but only one of these is actually productive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Then this card will be really nice. It's definitely a quick-effect, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 28, 2013 Report Share Posted October 28, 2013 Is there any card that can activate its effect twice in the same chain? The Naturia Synchros/Exterio and Horus LV8 come to mind, in addition to the aforementioned Herald of Hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Yes, but only one of these is actually productive.Since this is a card game id say neither is productive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Since this is a card game id say neither is productive Okay, only one of these actually makes some sort of difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goddamnit names are a pain Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 This guy sucks. Now, to the (other) facts. With Xyz becoming more and more full of crap like this guy, I am seeing the need for Stun decks to return, as well as some decks that don't have a field or hand (lolz!). So, what Stun should be used to fight this guy? Or should we just keep playing our normal decks and suck it up once this guy appears? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 This guy sucks. Now, to the (other) facts. With Xyz becoming more and more full of crap like this guy, I am seeing the need for Stun decks to return, as well as some decks that don't have a field or hand (lolz!). So, what Stun should be used to fight this guy? Or should we just keep playing our normal decks and suck it up once this guy appears? Rabbit to 3. Evolzar Laggia returns. Yuuuuus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suibon Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Great -- more and more shit to try to tone shit down. Progress! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Great -- more and more shit to try to tone shit down. Progress! Is there anything better than making more problems to solve previous ones? ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Is there anything better than making more problems to solve previous ones? ^^ Not according to governments... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 While testing it, I realized that being able to activate its effect twice in a chain makes it practically inmune to Veiler/Fiendish/etc... (Someone probably mentioned it earlier, but I'm to lazy to check) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 While testing it, I realized that being able to activate its effect twice in a chain makes it practically inmune to Veiler/Fiendish/etc... (Someone probably mentioned it earlier, but I'm to lazy to check) The obvious exception being if they're only leading by one card, because pitching Veiler would make card count even. Odds of that actually happening are rare, but it does mean running cards with discard/tribute cost are the best outs to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UltimateIRS Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 While testing it, I realized that being able to activate its effect twice in a chain makes it practically inmune to Veiler/Fiendish/etc... (Someone probably mentioned it earlier, but I'm to lazy to check) Only cards that specifically Chain to something can be activated more than once in the same Chain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Aren't LaDD and Apex Avian disagree with that statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 29, 2013 Report Share Posted October 29, 2013 Only cards that specifically Chain to something can be activated more than once in the same Chain. No, it's quick effects with a cost can chain to itself, since not having a cost causes the problems of an infinite chain possibility. Aren't LaDD and Apex Avian disagree with that statement? No because of what I just stated above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.