Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 01/26/2020 in all areas

  1. 2 points
    Holy shit I got through them all! Kingdom Hearts 3 is finished, no more Kingdom Hea-what's that? There's DLC for KH3? FUUUUUUUUU
  2. 1 point
    *I do not own this artwork Edits done by me Template Cred: grezar (DeviantART) ________________________________________________________ NOTES: I guess pretty self-explained. Mainly used to stop those pesky hand traps. The card may not be considered fast-pace but I guess it could do. ________________________________________________________ To see more of my custom cards, you can check out my DeviantART
  3. 1 point
    Well... we're getting a Charmer Structure Deck after all.
  4. 1 point
    I learned Magic ages ago, but I only really play if no one else is around to play Yugioh. A friend has a bunch of Commander decks and he likes roping me in. I do really enjoy cube/draft format though. Makes me wish Yugioh had more Battle Packs. Mechanically, I based these on the Commander Yuriko and MTG's "Ninjitsu" ability. Theme-wise, since ninjas are already taken, I decided to make these more like an assassin order.
  5. 1 point
    Possibly my favorite battle in all Naruto history, including Shippuden. Omote Renge!!!
  6. 1 point
    I haven't been following court cases Project Veritas was involved in. Quickly looking into that, and I see that they did have some libel suits against them tossed. I do not, however, see how that suddenly makes them a legitimate news source. Since "veritas has absolutely destroyed every single accusation against them in a court of law" is such a ridiculous absolute statement, all it takes is a single example where they didn't "destroy" such accusations. https://www.prwatch.org/news/2013/03/12019/james-o’keefe-pays-100k-settlement-after-deceiving-public-about-acorn-alec’s-help Take, for example, where James O'Keefe specifically had to settle for filming someone without their consent, then editing the video to portray them untruthfully and spreading it on Breitbart. I frankly do not have the time to look into every single possible lawsuit and which ones O'Keefe won or lost, but nothing I have seen suggests that they are a legitimate source. They are, at best, useful for your own confirmation bias. Nothing Obama did every rose to the level of impeachable offense that Trump committed. Not that it stopped them from trying, and let's not forget Bill Clinton's impeachment. I don't know about you, but I think withholding aid on the condition of an investigation into a political rival is a lot worse than lying about a blowjob. And, again, you're ignoring that Republicans were "kept out" of certain hearings because those hearings were conducted by specific committees, which did have Republicans on them, and the Republicans complaining either chose not to attend, or were not members of those committees, so they would have had no business being involved. But I realize that you love to disqualify evidence when it's inconvenient for your argument. You are… really reaching when you try to say that I'm okay with cheating, disrespect, and dishonesty depending on the outcome. If the bashing cancer patients is referring to Samantha Bee, then yeah, I have no problem disavowing her. I thought that her "coverage" about the guy was absolutely despicable, and IIRC, her "apology" was woefully hollow and lacking. Don't start with me about anyone running over 14 year olds with cars or holding up a block when you and Winter literally defended a Nazi for running his car into protesters, excusing his actions by imagining him in a state of panic, insisting that we somehow could not know his motivations, all the while it was okay for you to do the same. And let's not forgot that Winter's only concern was that the Nazi didn't kill even more people, just because the victims hold political leanings different from Winter's. I had previously shut down your "hold up entire blocks worth or regular people so they can attack anybody who dares object to their worldview" talking point. I realize that you're only throwing those examples at the wall and attempting to make a pitiful bid at trying to call me a hypocrite, but your deflection really does not work. I'm not exactly under any moral obligation to take you seriously with whatever you hope to accomplish there. Trump specifically mentioned Biden by name in his call with Zelensky. When Trump does that, it contributes to the concerns about his conspiracies with foreign powers. It's not the "clear difference" you want it to be. Trump's actions give more fuel to the fire for everyone calling out how he enables foreign interference. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-cooper/ukraine-officials-knew-about-hold-on-aid-earlier-than-reported-idUSKBN1XU2VX With all due respect to Zelensky, you do realize that Zelensky's statement about "no pressure" has been met with scrutiny? Ukraine did know that aid was withheld, so good job once again parroting a talking point that was already debunked. Thanks for making this easy. Even with the secondhand accounts, they were still consistent, and the firsthand accounts were obstructed by the administration, or in John Bolton's case, withheld for the sake of a publicity stunt. But knowing you, I'm sure you'll have an excuse for why it was actually proper policy, if not an inherent obligation on the administration's part to block those firsthand accounts. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/16/gchq-denies-wiretap-claim-trump-obama British intelligence dismissed the claim that they had somehow helped find any evidence of wiretapping. Jesus Christ, the article even has to point out that it's over two years old. How is it that you are still repeating these talking points literal years after they've already been shut down? British intelligence denied it, Comey and Horowitz found nothing, and all you have left as a source is Barr. I trust you understand why I do not consider him a legitimate source by this point now, right? That's not even a case of him being able to prove it happened. It's just that Trump said it happened, so Barr's job is to insist it totally happened. I was saying that Nunes kept trying to tie the hearings to the dossier, when there was no merit to whatever he wanted to do. As you always love to do, you seem to be conflating two entirely separate circumstances. I was only denying the dossier's involvement in the articles of impeachment. Let's both be clear on what you're trying to do here. You either expect me to agree with you, or if I do not, that further demonstrates that I am somehow a hypocrite. Those could both be valid options if your entire premise was in any way valid. You are still trying to repeat the claim that Obama wiretapped Trump, and it's still been debunked. Let's just make it clear what actually happened: Trump made a false claim against Obama, then when people were hired to actually investigate that claim, they turned up nothing. Bernie endorsed Clinton because, at that point in time, it was more important to get the voters united against Trump. That was a pragmatic solution. The California congressman is still a Republican, and one whom Kevin McCarthy put in the same corner as Trump by saying they're the two people he thinks Russia pays. And while I am aware that there is massive support for pardoning Assange, Trump's motivations for doing so are more about his own personal interests. When you repeat arguments that were already proven wrong years ago, I can't take you seriously when you claim that I'm the one stuck in a bubble. The videos I linked also gave Tim credit where it was due. I get that the world doesn't think the way I do, so it's kind of funny how desperate you're getting here. Tim also tried to claim that the "gulag" video would end Bernie's campaign, and as far as I can tell, Tim's paranoia was largely dismissed, and in fact, Bernie's continued to rise in the polls. You need to assume that I'm making some bizarre generalization, as if I believe anyone "not on my side" (However you're imagining I define that) because they don't believe the way I do. In your case, I think it's just that you let Pool and O'Keefe do the thinking for you, and as you just showed with regards to the wiretapping, you admitted you were wrong as a joke before doubling down on why you were totally right, then… I don't know how many times I can say this, but parroting arguments that were debunked years ago. I criticize Tim Pool because he is symptomatic of people who claim to be neutral or sit on the center, except their behavior shows that they are anything but that. As Jose points out here, Tim Pool reads a single article, and attempts to substitute it as if were somehow a condemnation against the entire "left". Centrists like Tim Pool espouse a dishonest position, but I accept that they don't think the way I do. I realize that they are also just a small part of the world. I think it's at least fair to say that if there's something I don't understand, it's whatever point you're hoping to make here. I'm not sure if you noticed it, but you were trying to criticize my own inability to see outside my bubble while you insisted on reinforcing your own. It is actually hilarious how much pride you take in sticking in your own bubble because you refused to accept any challenges to the people you rely on to think for you. From O'Keefe to Trump to Pool, you spent your entire post reaffirming your belief in them. When you challenged me on mine, I legitimately do not think you expected me to criticize Samantha Bee. I assume you expected me to give her a free pass for some reason. As for Charlottesville, it would be dishonest of me to turn my back on the positions I expressed back in the thread when you were absolutely determined to defend a Nazi. You know, the thread where I shot down your arguments at every possible turn because I had evidence that backed up my position, and you did not. In 2016, I absolutely refused to support Clinton. I did not see the value in aligning with her, because when people claimed that she was the best bet to defeat Trump, I thought it was more important to defeat her in the primary and have Bernie, if not anyone else. Then she won the popular vote, but the electoral college screwed her. While I'm happy that she lost, I hate that her defeat became synonymous with Trump's victory. My own stubbornness from back then was my worldview that I needed to grow from. I'll admit I'm looking forward to the schadenfreude but getting to turn "Vote blue no matter who" on everyone who was hoping it just meant that we should be willing to accept if Bernie doesn't become the nominee, but I realize why the overall sentiment is important. I added the news about Nunes to my post that Friday because that was really good day. It actually freaked me out how good it was. Nunes lost one of the lawsuits that conservatives desperately hoped for. You had once bragged that Vic Mignogna filing a lawsuit at all somehow proved you right, but then he lost the case, and while it is being appealed, the appellate brief was disastrous, and he's guaranteed to lose his appeal as well. It was also satisfying when several of his sycophants got their accounts locked. Then, despite MSNBC losing their minds by hoping to compare Bernie and his supporters Nazis, Bernie kicked ass in Nevada. I've had my worries, but I feel pretty good about the election. Despite how badly people want to claim Bernie is a Russian asset, all I can really believe is that Trump thinks Bernie is the candidate he has the best chance against. You seem to believe the same. That said, as much as people would hate to admit that their darling Hillary could have done anything wrong, or should bear any responsibility for Trump coming into power, I honestly believe that leak that Hillary wanted Trump as the "pied piper candidate" because she thought Trump would also be an easy opponent to beat. So I'm open to expecting that strategy to work both ways. EDIT: https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/09/inspector-generals-report-russia-key-takeaways-079030 https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/474113-watchdog-steele-dossier-had-no-impact-on-opening-of-2016-probe My apologies, we were wrong about the dossier's role in investigating Carter Page. It appears that "the dossier prepared by former British spy Christopher Steele did not prompt the original DOJ investigation into members of the Trump campaign." I can trust what the actual investigation into this matter found. So once again, you are trying to hinge your entire argument on a desperate conspiracy theory that was already debunked. I almost feel bad that your worldview keeps getting blasted down.
  7. 1 point
    I'm just gonna leave this here due to how badass this moment/technique is.
  8. 1 point
    I find the concept to be a super cool one. Non-targeting banishing is a pretty good form of removal, and not being a once per turn deal is great. Though being battle reliant and restricted to the ATK parameters of both sides keeps it casual fun without making it necessarily bad. Best thing is that you get to keep your own monsters, so maybe it is for once potentially a good excuse for a Pendulum engine that would aim to consistently bring back non-Pendulum monsters from hand. A few things bring it down though. It not being searchable/recyclable, and the sheer amount of battle damage it'll cause to run such strategy. One could otherwise very well design a build with a monster line up that takes advantage of it. Huh... I might need to come back and think of this more later. Something tells me the OP is not up to date with updates made along the thread, and also I can't actually think of currently existing in-game monsters that could combo with it beyond a Puddingcess... but I saw the "before damage calc" so I'm gonna consider if it even works.... Still I'm on board with the concept. I saw a glimpse of a clause down there that boosts your monster to equal the banished one next time you put him back on the field? that sounds a bit wordy to get through. Finally, the art. That's lovely.
  9. 1 point
  10. 1 point
    Thanks, but yeah, I did intend for it to work on both players on any turn. Don't want to open any loopholes with this alongside handtraps.
  11. 1 point
    Unironically citing proven disinformation outfit Project Veritas isn't really helping your case. And Democrats followed rules that Republicans implemented for the Benghazi hearings, so I can't be mad at Democrats when they were following protocol that Republicans established. And let's not forget that they did allow relevant witnesses from Republicans during the House impeachment trial. However, when those witnesses gave testimony that was damaging to Trump's case, Nunes disowned them and falsely claimed that they were somehow witnesses for the Democrats. As I recall, some of the Republicans that were "blocked" were simply not on the committee, so they would have had no reason to be on there anyway. Like, I get that the Republicans said that they were being blocked, but there is a difference between obstructing someone who legally has a right to be there, and just choosing to not be in a room, but somehow saying it's someone else's fault for not inviting you. I did point out that Biden was going to lose regardless. Multiple times. I was saying it was funny that Trump was going to such great lengths to try and sabotage Biden, when Biden is going to lose because Democratic voters already don't like him, regardless of Trump's efforts. And no, withholding congressionally approved foreign aid on the condition of getting that investigation is not within his rights. It was in fact what he was impeached for, though I noticed that you deliberately ignored that. Wasn't Trump's paranoia that Obama had him tapped previously debunked? I'm just saying, it's hard to take it seriously when you try to somehow tie the articles of impeachment to the Steele dossier one moment, then in the next breath expect anyone to take Project Veritas or the "Obama wiretapped Trump" conspiracy seriously. Devin Nunes was widely mocked because he was obsessed with bringing up the Steele dossier when it wasn't at all relevant. "I'm not quite sure where you're getting "each and every cause of the impeachment article was confirmed to have been circle sourced from the debunked steel dossier." I recognize that the dossier was debunked, but that was in a completely separate investigation that had no bearing on impeachment, and the articles of impeachment were in response to the call with Zelensky. I didn't think you would need this clarification, but the call didn't have anything to do with the Steele dossier. As you yourself said on numerous occasions throughout this thread, the dossier is irrelevant. That was what made Nunes's performance in the House hearings pathetic. He kept trying to deflect onto it, but the witnesses were confused by he kept bringing it up. Bernie spent 2016 condemning the DNC, to the point that the rules had been changed specifically to address his criticisms. The Iowa caucuses were a disaster, and Bernie was hardly quiet about that. I get that you love to be dishonest, even when it's such a really obvious lie. Again, just look at how your attempt to somehow frame the Steele dossier as the origin of the articles of impeachment as desperately as the Congressman suing Twitter because a satirical cow hurt his feelings. I understand if you're not paying attention to the primary, because it requires particularly willful ignorance to think that Bernie is somehow on the DNC's side now. For what it's worth, no, I don't support Bloomberg at all. Mostly because, for the reasons you gave, I see him as just as bad as Trump. As far as I'm concerned, Steyer and Gabbard should drop out next because of their dismal performances in the caucuses thus far, as well as how they've failed to make it to the debate stage, and then I hope Bloomberg is next. I can take or leave Warren and Klobuchar, although I'm certainly open-minded to criticisms levied at them, particularly Klobuchar's history as a prosecutor. Biden is completely out of touch with reality and only seems capable of pointing to the 80s, if not decades earlier than that, as if they are somehow supposed to be a golden standard meant to aspire towards, and Buttigieg is just a younger, more incompetent Bloomberg. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/483642-poll-trump-edges-out-all-top-2020-democratic-candidates-except-sanders The margin is too close for comfort, but so far it does seem like Bernie is the best candidate against Trump. The problem is that, just as too many people saw no significant difference between Clinton and Trump, it now seems like people are more eager to equate Bernie with Trump. Regarding what you said about Bernie's supporters, the primary criticism I've seen there is direct comparisons to Trump and his own supporters. But I realize that you need to regurgitate whatever "enlightened centrist" talking points Tim Pool feeds you because it's harder to think for yourself, so I don't expect the comparison to mean much. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears Oh look, Julian Assange's lawyer said that Trump offered a pardon to Assange if he agreed to cover up Russia's involvement in hacking the DNC. What a completely unsurprising development completely in line with everything else we've seen. EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7Wv59W0uPo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AnrGWF2ri4 I would recommend watching these videos. It seems to me that your arguments have gradually dwindled towards simply repeating whatever Tim Pool says. I think that's why you tried to go with the "impeachment was sourced by the Steele dossier" conspiracy. It might help if you were more willing to accept challenges to the source of your talking points.
  12. 1 point
    While there is no precedent for writing it like that specifically (as far as I know), listing it out does follow certain conventions, so it's perfectly fine. As long as you use yugioh terminology and it's understood what your card does, most peeps here won't really care a ton if the grammar is bent a bit. That said, since you asked, I figured I'd help clean the text a little:
  13. 1 point
    RD/KP01-JP022 Akatsuki no Yuusha Lydacross (Brave of Dawn, Lydacross) Level 7 LIGHT Warrior Effect Monster ATK 2100 DEF 1500 Requirement: Return 2 monsters (Spellcaster) in your Graveyard to the Deck to activate. Effect: Special Summon up to 2 monsters (Level 5 or lower/Spellcaster) from the hand to your side of the field in face-up position. RD/KP01-JP016 Max Raider Level 7 EARTH Warrior NormalMonster ATK 2400 DEF 1400 オノを持つ戦士。極限まで自分を追い込み、肉体を鍛え上げた。二挺のオノを振り回す攻撃はかなり強い。 (A warrior who wield axes. He has trained his body, pushing himself to the limits. His attacks that swing two axes are quite strong.) I am not sure what position Brave of Dawn, Lydacross Summons the monsters in here, it was just like that on the Org, anyone who knows? Also Axe Raider retrain is fun, I guess with Blue-Eyes being a part of the anime, there may be more legacy support coming. https://ygorganization.com/axeraidergotswole/
  14. 1 point
    virginia gun bill's dead. as well it should be. The story in a nutshell Also, yeah Horu. it's almost a guarantee at this point. Bar his opponents somehow cheating, trump is looking like a guaranteed outcome at this point. also, not sure what your stance may be, but to preempt the question, assuming you may have it; no Horu, Trump will not, and has not cheated in an election. it was alleged, it was slapped down, and has since been discovered to be the exact thing it was called in the beginning. aka wrong and pointless.
  15. 1 point
    RD/ST02-JP001 Rengeki Ryuu Dragears (Rush Dragon Dragears) Level 7 LIGHT Dragon Effect Monster ATK 2500 DEF 1500 Requirement: Send the top card of your Deck to the GY to activate. Effect: This turn, during a Battle Phase in which this card destroyed a monster by battle, this card can attack once again. Rush Duel RD/ST02-JP004 Ankoku no Ryuu Kishi (Dark Dragon Knight) Level 5 DARK Dragon Normal Monster ATK 1600 DEF 1100 黒き軍勢を率いる竜騎士。慈悲なき一撃は強力無比。手にする邪剣は敵の魂を食らい成長を続けている。 (A dragon knight who leads the dark army. His merciless strikes are without equal. The evil sword he wields consumes the souls of his enemies, continuing to grow.) Rush Duel RD/ST02-JP005 Dragolite Level 4 EARTH Dragon Normal Monster ATK 1500 DEF 0 地下鉱脈を起源とする。未知の鉱石が発するエネルギーを動力原とし闘い続ける。超硬度の打撃は威力抜群だ! (It came from an underground mineral vein. It keeps fighting using the energy of an unknown ore as a power source. Its super hard hitting blows are simply outstanding!) Rush Duel RD/ST02-JP011 Dragonic Pressure Spell Card Requirement: Send 3 monsters (Dragon) from your hand to the GY to activate. Effect: Destroy all monsters on both sides of the field. If any monsters are destroyed by this effect, you can Special Summon 1 monster (Level 4 or lower/Dragon) from your GY in face-up Defense Position. Rush Duel Oh boy, he likes dragons, what a novel concept. It's pretty weird to think about, but sending 3 monsters to the GY isn't that heavy of a cost considering how Rush Duels work here, and I assume you can't use non-Rush Duel cards in a Rush Duel, otherwise why bother with such a card, but hey, they got a Dark Hole of sorts. Rush Dragon Dragears and Seven Road Magician both mill as a cost, so that's a cute thing that may not come in the anime, probably not, but could be. https://ygorganization.com/lookmahitcankeepattacking/
  16. 1 point
    After a short 3 week hiatus, I have returned. I am once again healthy, and have made another new archetype in casual multiples. (Good grief immune system, I knew you sucked, but really? Sick 6 times and we are only halfway through February? c'mon. . . )
  17. 1 point
    It's about time, I'm getting sick of all the social commentary." And when you think about it, isn't that exactly the point? Parking. And driving. And shopping. And eating. And working. Somewhere, somehow, they're different now, none of 'em are the same, they all got chewed up and spit back out, and they don't taste like living anymore! Don't you see what it's like in this deranged Whirring Blender of a world?! Every day is an agonizing ordeal, like balancing a pot of scalding water on your head while people whip your legs and butt … Aaaah, you never forget your senior prom … YOU think I'm "sick"?! Well the only disease I've got is "Modern Life," a schnutbusting gauntlet of inefficiency and misery that's one long parade of let-downs, put-downs, trickle downs, shutouts, freeze outs, sell-outs, numnuts, nincompoops and nimrods, all making every day as much fun as waxing a flaming Pontiac with your tongue, where even if you do luck into the possibility of some fleeting pleasure, like, say, if some nymphomaniac telephone operator with the muscle control of Romanian mat-slappers agree to a little strip air hockey, it'll be over before it starts 'cuz some vowel-lacking, feta-reeking cab-jockey slams his checker up your hatchback and the cab is owned by some pinata spanker from a Santeria cult in Xoacalpa who starts shaking chicken bones at you and gives you a boil on your neck so big all it needs is LeBron James' autograph to make it complete, and even with all this, with ALL THIS, I still drag my sorry butt off the Sealy every morning and stick my face in the reaping machine for one more day, knowing when it's time to flash the cosmic card key at those Pearly Gates, I won't be in the coffin anyway 'cuz some underhanded undertaker sold my heart, pancreas and other assorted Good 'N' Plenty to that same Santeria cult so does anybody really wonder why anybody is hanging onto sanity by the atoms on the tips of their fingernails while life dirty-dances on their digits, and is it really any wonder that I seem DERANGED ???!! Take care of your mental health, I guess?
  18. 1 point
    Finished the Gen 7 living dex, complete with regional forms. Not going to worry to much about Gen 8 since I don't know how I want to build everything (plus not everything has there HA that I want) and I'm not moving the Living Dex forward until doing so won't trap most of the Pokemon in Home. Going to start on breeding work. Been a LONG time since I was actively breeding competitive Pokemon instead of accidentally getting them while working on the Living Dex. Plus I'm going to end up doing some Gen 8 stuff so I'll still end up with a bit of a head start.
  19. 1 point
    Dingrisu effect is honesty great. I'll take it. I WISH it shuffled into deck from Grave, Field, or Banish tho
  20. 1 point
    Once per turn during either player's turn: You can activate 1 Spell/Trap card from your hand. Cleaned up the text and took out the unnecessary bits (as effect monsters simply state what their effect is). Also, the bits that didn't mention where the Spell/Trap was coming from, I just assumed it'd be from the hand since that would be the most accessible spot to drop it from. As for the summoning up to 13 monsters bit, I just made it as many as possible or until you reach 13.
  21. 1 point
    SD38-JP001 Genmaoh Raviel – Tenkai Juurinken / Raviel, Lord of Phantasms – Heaven Crushing Fist (Dub: Raviel, Lord of Phantasms – Shimmering Scraper) Dark Fiend / Special Summon / Effect LV10 4000/4000 Cannot be Normal Summoned/Set. Must be Special Summoned (from your hand) by Tributing 3 monsters. You can only use this card name’s (1) and (2) effects once per turn each. (1) (Quick Effect): You can discard this card, then target 1 “Raviel, Lord of Phantasms” you control; for the rest of this turn, its ATK is doubled, also it can attack all monsters your opponent controls, once each. (2) If this card is in your GY: You can Tribute 1 monster; add this card to your hand. SD38-JP003 Ankoku no Shouraishin / Dark Beckoning Beast Level 2 DARK Fiend Effect Monster ATK 0 DEF 0 You can only use this card name’s (1) effect once per turn. (1) When this card is Normal Summoned: You can add 1 “Uria, Lord of Searing Flames”, 1 “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder”, 1 “Raviel, Lord of Phantasms”, or 1 card that specifically lists any of those names in its text from your Deck to your hand, except “Dark Beckoning Beast”. (2) During your Main Phase, you can Normal Summon 1 Fiend monster with 0 ATK and DEF, in addition to your Normal Summon/Set (you can only gain this effect once per turn). SD38-JP019 Shitsuraku no Hekireki / Lightning Strike of Paradise Lost (Dub: Cerulean Sky Fire) Continuous Spell Card (1) To Special Summon “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder” using its own procedure, you can send face-down Spells you control to the GY instead of face-up Continuous Spells (or any combination of both). (2) Once per turn, when an opponent’s activated Spell/Trap Card or effect resolves while you control an Attack Position “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder”, you can negate that effect, then change 1 “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder” you control to Defense Position. (3) If “Uria, Lord of Searing Flames”, “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder”, or “Raviel, Lord of Phantasms” you control leaves the field: You take no damage for the rest of this turn. SD38-JP034 Hyper Blaze Continuous Trap Card (1) To Special Summon “Uria, Lord of Searing Flames” using its own procedure, you can send face-down Traps you control to the GY instead of face-up ones (or any combination of both). (2) When an attack is declared involving your “Uria, Lord of Searing Flames”: You can send 1 Trap from your hand or Deck to the GY; its ATK/DEF becomes 1000 x the number of Traps on the field and in the GYs for the rest of this turn. (3) Once per turn: You can discard 1 card; take 1 “Uria, Lord of Searing Flames”, “Hamon, Lord of Striking Thunder”, or “Raviel, Lord of Phantasms” from your GY, and either add it to your hand or Special Summon it, ignoring its Summoning conditions
  22. 1 point
    Oh, sorry I hadn't noticed a post in here, although I saw that drawing at Discord a few days ago ^-^ I like it a lot. The hair of the second girl and the flowers in the basket of the last girl are my favorite parts of it.
  23. 1 point
    Uh, we’re randomly getting a new Valuable Book and a new series with it VB22-JP001 Dennou Kaijuu – Juju (Cyberspace Beast Jiuiiu) Level 6 WIND Psychic Synchro Effect Monster ATK 2400 DEF 1700 Materials: 1 Tuner + 1+ non-Tuner monsters You can only use this card name’s (2) effect once per turn. (1) Cannot be destroyed by battle or card effect while you have 2 or more monsters with different names but the same original Type and Attribute in your GY. (2) You can banish 2 monsters with different names but the same original Type and Attribute from your GY, then target 1 card on the field; send it to the GY. Note: This card’s name seems to be a reference to the software “Juju” potentially, as well as a repetition of Eagle in Chinese. VB22-JP002 Dennou Kairyuu – Ronron (Cyberspace Dragon Longlong) Rank 3 EARTH Wyrm Xyz Effect Monster ATK 2400 DEF 2000 Materials: 2+ Level 3 monsters with the same original Type and Attribute You can only use this card name’s (2) effect once per turn. (1) Cannot be targeted by an opponent’s card effect while it has material. (2) When an opponent’s monster effect is activated by a monster whose Attribute does not exist on your field, and your opponent controls a face-up monster (Quick Effect): You can detach 2 Xyz Materials from this card; negate the activation. Note: This card’s name seems to be a reference to Longlong Integers, as well as a repetition of Dragon in Chinese. Source: https://ygorganization.com/itsalonglongday/
  24. 1 point
    Vassal of Eldlich lv 4 LIGHT Zombie/Effect If this card is Normal or Special Summoned: Add 1 "Cursed El Dorlando" from your Deck to your hand. During your Main Phase: You can tribute this card or send 1 Spell/Trap card in your hand to the GY; Special Summon 1 "Eldlich the Golden Lord" from your hand, and if you do, the summoned monster cannot be targeted or destroyed by card effects. You can only use each effect of "Vassal of Eldlich" once per turn. ATK/1800 DEF/1500 So Vassal supports the newly revealed Eldlich theme by giving the deck an additional main deck monster that helps search Cursed El Dorlando and also lets you tribute it to bring out Golden Lord from your hand with a bit of ease with protection from targeting and destruction effects. In addition being a Level 4 Eldlich monster helps make the Eldlixir cards more playable.
  25. 1 point
    Hello, fine peoples! So uh... I've apparently caught a bad case of "god hand" today. I'll say this up front: I did NOT pull any Starlights, but my luck was arguably more insane. I decided to splurge a bit and went to Barnes & Noble and bought half a box of IGAS. Haven't actually opened packs in a while and I thought it'd be fun; you know, new card smell, ripping paper, the whole nine yards. I... I only barely knew what was in the box, so as I was having fun just opening the packs and reading the cards, I didn't realize what I was doing. ... I pulled 4 different Secret Rares: Lightning Storm, Plunder Patrollship Brann, Gizmek Kaku, the Supreme Shining Sky Stag, and Sales Pitch. For reference, Boxes (24 packs) on average come with 2 Secrets. It's possible to pull more or less, but that normally equates to 1 per 12 packs. I pulled SIX Secrets in 12 packs. "Wait, 6? You just said..." I said I pulled 4 different Secrets. I pulled THREE copies of Gizmek Kaku. Who just happens to be the second most expensive (non-Starlight) card in the set. Frankly... this is terrifying. (Sorry for the bad image quality)
  26. 1 point
    Sword Soldier Spell Card Target 1 Warrior monster you control; equip 1 Warrior monster from your Deck to the targeted monster. The equipped monster gains ATK equal to the ATK of the monster equipped to it by this this effect. You can only activate "Sword Soldier" once per turn. So Sword Solider is a spell allows you to equip warriors from your deck to warriors you control giving them a big attack boost. In addition this can work in some decks where if the equipped monster is sent to the grave the equipped card will also be sent thus allowing to activate any graveyard effects it may have.
  27. 1 point
    MVP. An excellent defensive effect that not only can be activated in either player's turn but will also provide you with fodder for the advent of Grimmace and powerful synergy with Nora. If your opponent dares to destroy the tokens, your GY will be fortified. Well rounded critter. Most interesting stuff, ocg-wise. Do this means that, despite the replay, your opponent is forced to keep attacking? Is there a precedent for this term? Finally, I wanted to point out a few things in Grimmoire Stitchings. According to this page, you should only use "field" instead of "side of the field". You used GY and Graveyard in the same effect, and I think it should be "send the top card of your Deck to the GY" instead of "from". I hope you don't mind me pointing these out since we both know you're much better at ocg, but just wanted to help
  28. 1 point
    *grinds teeth* The only thing I like about this image is the fact that I also have a sharpie....... Nah, congratulations man, good going
  29. 1 point
    You're not my friend anymore. May the evil and caustic waves of envy that my body is expelling right now reach you, damn burger.
  30. 1 point
    Your fam bled to defend Ukraine vs the Nazis? It never had a right to leave the USSR ANYWAY
  31. 1 point
    Shoutout to Flame Dragon for doing all the site moderation round here. You deserve credit for your good deeds.
  32. 1 point
    For all the fans of DEATH NOTE, a new One Shot with 87 pages is available for everyone to enjoy (legally and for free). Here's the Link: https://mangaplus.shueisha.co.jp/viewer/1006371
  33. 1 point
    Well, strictly speaking, the Banished Zone doesn't exist. It is a semi-official term given to the place where you send banished cards. It isn't even in a playmat, but players by consensus often use the zone above or to the right of the Graveyard.
  34. 1 point
    ❇❇❇Waifu Card of the Week (FanArt Mode) - Madolche Magileine❇❇❇ The Good (in this version): She's been upgraded to a gorgeous witch, all sweets and sexyness. She's able to take you anywhere on her broom, so say bye to traffic jams. Also, she has connections to the royalty, which should be interesting. The Bad (in this version): Man, this time, I don't see any. Although I guess she's a little smug, you have to bear with it.
  35. 1 point
    @Horu Ishayuki You have 6 YP and a "Skip". Do you want to buy?
  36. 1 point
    He was killed by Yami Bakura who murdered him by taking the millennium eye Correct . Here's a "Skip" and 2 YP @Bluvista has 2 YP @Horu Ishayuki has 4 YP and a "Skip" Question 5: Who is Mokuba Kaiba (Manga/S0)
  37. 1 point
    He was defeated by Atem via Kuriboh, Multiply and Magician of Black Chaos then lost his Millennium Eye to Yami Bakura shortly afterward. Bakura killed Pegasus in the manga fyi.
  38. 1 point
    Question 3: Whats the game Mokuba Plays in Death T? Season 0?
  39. 1 point
  40. 1 point
    New Stock: Clue- 1 YP Question- 10 YP Wish- 107.50 YP (25 % off) Uno skip card- 5 YP (Buy 1 get 1 Free)
  41. 1 point
    @Horu Ishayuki Is CORRECT. 2 YP for you Question 2: What is Yami Yuigis first Yami No Game? Manga?
  42. 1 point
    I like it so far. One thing though. I think you should add a clause in Distortionist's effect that prevents it from adding itself back into the hand. Could make for a nasty loop imo.
  43. 1 point
    Don't buy warcraft 3 regforged or refund it if you have!
  44. 1 point
    Uno Reverse changes the turn rotation. For example: If Kiniko, Horu, Rayfield and Tinkerer are playing Uno and Horu is first, then Kiniko plays a Reverse, Horu takes another turn, followed by Tinkerer then Rayfield and finally back to Kiniko, unless Rayfield also plays a Reverse then the turn rotation would go back to Tinkerer.
  45. 1 point
    I don't post cards in advanced because I'm a casual player.
  46. 1 point
    Thinking of ideas for a good stall/recycle deck.
  47. 1 point
    Kiniko is skipped and instead of freeing Horu, he freed a blind version of Horu that uses Dark/Water monsters to destroy his opponents. I wish I had an idea of what to create for this version.
  48. 1 point
    Eh, the term has generally broadened to field > Deck. At least, that's how I've always seen it used. Could totally be wrong though; I wonder where the term came from? Yeah, in general, spin effects are some of the most powerful types of removal, so having an archetype based on the mechanic has to be planned out pretty carefully. I didn't look through all the cards specifically, so I'm not entirely sure their full capability, but for starters, I'd definitely recommend following what Ray said about adding hard OPTs. Without them, I can definitely see there being some way to loop these cards (maybe infinitely) and remove the opponent's entire board. I also have to mimic what Jolly said: there's just a lot of cards here. Giving a quick glance through some of the cards, it really feels like some of them are unnecessary. It could really help to "cut the fat" a bit, but I'll have to get back to you on specifics. I didn't mention this before, but because it could take a while for me to actually review sets this big in their entirety, I'd recommend making sure to "bump" your threads up every now and then. Cheers!
  49. 1 point
    Hello! This is is the first cards I post in the forum. I hope you like them! (Original artwork: https://www.zerochan.net/2056225) Neo Space Wanderer (LIGHT) Warrior/Link/Effect 1 "Neo-Spacian" monster This card's name becaomes "Elemental HERO Neos" while on the field. If this card returns from the field to your Extra Deck, you can activate 1 "Neos" or "Neo Space" Spell/Trap from your Deck. During the End Phase: Shuffle this card into your Extra Deck. ATK 1700/LINK-1 (Original artwork: https://infinitealchemist.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/the-lotus-flower/) Neo Space Flowering Normal Spell Card Special Summon 1 "Neo-Spacian" monster from your Deck. When you shuffle your Deck, except by the effect of "Neo Space Flowering", if this card is in your GY: you can shuffle this card into your Deck. My objective was to create something that could solve the constistency problems of the Neos achetype. I wonder, though, if these two cards don't make for somewhat too good of an engine, especially when splashed in other decks.
  50. 1 point
    Where do i find my old cards.
  • Create New...