Jump to content

New Set.Need a lot of criticism.


Infernalhero

Recommended Posts

Ok.As I said,I have a new set planned out.And I need much criticism.This way I can work out my kinks and what not.So heres the first cvard in my new set.

 

[spoiler=Maverik]

55843s.jpg

"Guardian Blitz"+"1 or more Non-Tuner monsters"

This card can only be Synchro Summoned.When this card is Synchro Summoned,this card gains 200 attack for every monster with "Guardian" in it's name.If this card destroys a level 6 or lower monster,this card loses 300 attack points.

 

 

 

I'll have the Tuner up in a matter of minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cause hes meant to be a big hitter in GUARDIAN decks,which is what ill hopefully make,just in set form.So,usually,in my opinion I'd run him as the round winner cause of his ability to increase for every GUARDIAN card.So naturally I,and maybe some others,would run him for when the graves full of GUARDIANs,giving him the biggest boost of a lifetime.And it's hard to me it kinda balances him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. *laughs*

 

OCG fix:

"This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Synchro Summon. When this card is Synchro Summoned, this card gains 200 ATK for every face-up monster that includes "Guardian" in it's name on the field. If this card destroys a level 6 or lower monster as a result of battle, this card loses 300 ATK."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not. There has to be further distinction, though I highly doubt that you'd bother running the other obscure "Guardian" named monsters if you're planning a set.

 

Also, there has to be specification as to its source for gaining ATK. Meaning, does he get 200 for each Guardian on the field, each face-up Guardian your opponent controls, each Guardian in your Graveyard, or a combination of those?

 

Not much to say about this, since it's part of a set in progress, while there's nothing about it that stands out as unique.

 

7/10, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you suggest a different name then?And I'll fix it' date='sorry about that.Thanks for the help.

[/quote']

 

Trying to decipher from the picture' date=' but I don't know how it clashes with your other pictures.

 

Auraguards/Aura Guards, Darksides, I really don't know. >_>

[/quote']

 

^ Was referring to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...