Kavasey Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 My newest card. please comment unless your name is Starly64. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Elemental Hero Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 It has no effect... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't belong in realistic cards. Belongs in any other cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-GoD- Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 How do you get pictures like that? Photo Shop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord JZ of the Enigma Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Well, maybe he's trying to make a card from back in the day, when vanillas were numerous and powerful, and effects were simply an extra feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al9090 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 How do you get pictures like that? Photo Shop? No its been shown before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord JZ of the Enigma Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I think I remember seeing that pic about a year ago. I still like it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al9090 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 They have been showing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't belong in realistic cards. Belongs in any other cards. No' date=' it belongs in Realistic Cards as it's Realistic. The Any Other Cards section should be abolished as Konami [i']could[/i] make anything, and although we can make predictions that they won't make certain cards based on patterns of events, they won't be accurate predictions and we don't know what the future holds. On to the card. Rename it "Red-Eyes B. Magician". Set ID prefix should be four letters, and the suffix should be "EN006". Crop the text out of the picture. ^Fix that, and it's perfectly realistic, but could use an effect to add flash and creativity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
§hadow §triker Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I suggest you add an effect. Right now, I would rather use Blue Eyes. Give it an effect if you want it to be any good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hamcha Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 horrible but a nice try for a 1 star Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tohob Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Doesn't belong in realistic cards. Belongs in any other cards. No' date=' it belongs in Realistic Cards as it's Realistic. The Any Other Cards section should be abolished as Konami [i']could[/i] make anything, and although we can make predictions that they won't make certain cards based on patterns of events, they won't be accurate predictions and we don't know what the future holds. On to the card. Rename it "Red-Eyes B. Magician". Set ID prefix should be four letters, and the suffix should be "EN006". Crop the text out of the picture. ^Fix that, and it's perfectly realistic, but could use an effect to add flash and creativity. Actually, on the older cards, the "Set ID prefix" was 3 letters, and the suffix did not have an "EN" at the beginning.~is currently looking at my 4 remaining cards from starter decks Joey, Yugi, and Kaiba.~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nighthawk14 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Wait why can't normal monsters be in the realistic cards section it's still realistic because not all cards have effectsand where is the Image credit????anyway i like the pic, but that is like all i can judge on so 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.