GodOfEgypt Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Effect:1 Tuner + 1 non-Tuner monsterIf "Umi" is face-up on the field, increase the ATK of this card by 500. If "Umi" is face-up on your field, this card is unaffected by Trap Cards. Once per turn, during your Standby Phase, you can discard 1 card from your hand. Toss a coin. If heads, destroy 1 card on the field. Image Credit:http://sage666.deviantart.com/art/mermaid-19552313 Now, before you critizise me about OPed, keep in mind that you cannot use more than one non-Tuner to Summon this. So, with most Tuners being about Level 2-3, that means you'll need a Level 7 or 8 non-Tuner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durandamon Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 I fixed it: 1 Tuner + 1 non-Tuner monsterIf "Umi" is active on the field, this card gains 300 ATK. If "Umi" is active on your side of the field, this card is unaffected by Trap Cards. Once per turn, you can discard 1 card and toss a coin. If heads, destroy 1 card on the field. You should change the attack to 2500.Overall:8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayasato-chan Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 It's... do-able. But a pain to get out. (Regenerating Rose + Lv. 3 Tuner is one way I guess.) ^You didn't get al of the errors^ Fixed OCG:1 Tuner + 1 non-Tuner monsterIf the Field Spell "Umi" is face-up on the field, increase the ATK of this card by 500. If "Umi" is face-up on your field, this card is unaffected by Trap Cards. Once per turn, during your Standby Phase, you can discard 1 card from your hand. Toss a coin. If heads, destroy 1 card on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodOfEgypt Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Hmm. How about 2800 ATK? I do see your point about the 500 ATK gain. I guess that was a bit much. EDIT: Aya, is "Field Spell" necessary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayasato-chan Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Actually, it's balanced. You don't need to get rid of the 500 ATK increase. (Note: OCG = increase, not gain.) But 2800 seems a bit more reasonable. EDIT: Hm... that's the one part I'm not sure of. The rest of the corrections are true.... But you might need a second opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff! Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 2900, IMO. we need more 2900'ers.Then we can get to work on DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Spec Sum trap eater lvl4 And normal sum Ohka lvl6 with it's effect and you got the tribbute in one turn with only two cards so in the right deck this would be easy to summon but it's still cool pic dose not suit a level 10 it looks at most a level 6 8/10 good job brilliont first try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodOfEgypt Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Thanks for the OCG correction. I'll change it in a minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al9090 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 cool card like the idea 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.