H4LOeffect Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Check'em out And special guest... Toon Link! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Bad Ocg Bad pics 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duel tester Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 overpowerdbut a great idea5/10try harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyroWildcat Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 - I'll have to agree with zillaz on the OCG. Look over real Toon monster cards and see how they're worded. On the same note, a lot of the abilities Toon monsters should have are absent here, like how they can attack directly and are unattackable by anything but other Toon monsters.- The pictures are extremely lacking. I can imagine that there aren't many(or even any) other pictures like this that you can use, but the little white bits around the images of the Pokemon themselves makes it so that they really clash with a black background. You have the right idea with the Latias and Latios card; white backgrounds aren't great, but they are better than what has been done with the other cards.- Manectric, Deoxys, and Link still have 'Effect' in their types; you might want to fix that.- Fake types; 'Thunder' works just as well as 'Electric', and 'Insect' works just as well as 'Bug'. Also, it seems that the OCG's 'Psychic' type works a specific way. You may want to change Deoxys to a 'Spellcaster', and leave Latias and Latios purely as a 'Dragon' type.- There's no Circulation or Set ID on most of these cards. You should focus on the other problems first, but you may also want to get used to adding these to all of your cards. It does tend to help.- ATK and DEF is WAY(this deserves emphasis) off for their levels. For a Level 4, you can't really get much higher than 1700 ATK without some kind of a drawback, such as a really low DEF. Also, Level 5 & 6 monsters really shouldn't be higher than about 2200 without a similar kind of drawback. See how the OCG and other members relate Levels to ATK and DEF, and adjust your own monsters accordingly. This is a good idea, you just need to work on the execution a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Really do you need to go in depth on how much works theses cards need? Not even using OCG for toons. Here is a card with the OCG of toons:[spoiler=My card]http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/6/6a/Blue-EyesToonDragonMRL-EN-ScR.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyroWildcat Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 In-depth advice is the kind I prefer to get, so it's the kind I give. Simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Whatever, you get right to the point, I just give advice not all at once. Not enough time to post all of that, but if you do then that is great. Also >_> you didn't even mention the OCG errors, so you contradicted what your sig says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostLetter227 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 - ATK and DEF is WAY(this deserves emphasis) off for their levels. For a Level 4' date=' you can't really get much higher than 1700 ATK without some kind of a drawback, such as a really low DEF. Also, Level 5 & 6 monsters really shouldn't be higher than about 2200 without a similar kind of drawback. See how the OCG and other members relate Levels to ATK and DEF, and adjust your own monsters accordingly. This is a good idea, you just need to work on the execution a bit.[/quote'] *Cough* 1800-1900 level 4's without drawbacks are faircommon. Take Neo Alius, for example. Also, no Level 5+ monsters can survive one turn without 2400. I should also recommend not wasting your breath on people that don't take criticism seriously, if at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyroWildcat Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Also >_> you didn't even mention the OCG errors' date=' so you contradicted what your sig says.[/quote'] Not really, I only mentioned the OCG regarding Toons in general, which I did address by directing the OP to real Toon monsters. I will admit that I was lazy here, and decided to get the more basic stuff out of the way, rather than putting much effort into the effects that the OP had actually put in the cards. I can see why you review the way you do, and heck, for the sake of time I sometimes want to do the same, but when I see a train wreck that actually looks somewhat salvagable, I can't really stop myself until I've already gotten out about half an essay worth of thoughts. And to answer what I know you're thinking, no, I have no idea what makes me think one set or another can be saved or not. *Cough* 1800-1900 level 4's without drawbacks are faircommon. Take Neo Alius' date=' for example. Also, no Level 5+ monsters can survive one turn without 2400.[/quote'] The card you directed me to has a DEF of 1300, which I think is pretty low; not quite as low as I was thinking when I made the original comment, I admit, but it still shows that Level 4 monsters with an ATK and DEF that are both 1700 or higher are overpowered. No comment on the Level 5-6 monsters. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Man, it's a good idea, but the ocg just isn't right. Effects are not quite what I want too.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostLetter227 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 *Cough* 1800-1900 level 4's without drawbacks are faircommon. Take Neo Alius' date=' for example. Also, no Level 5+ monsters can survive one turn without 2400.[/quote'] The card you directed me to has a DEF of 1300, which I think is pretty low; not quite as low as I was thinking when I made the original comment, I admit, but it still shows that Level 4 monsters with an ATK and DEF that are both 1700 or higher are overpowered. No comment on the Level 5-6 monsters. :P Screw the DEF, I got ATK! ( P.S: ATK is hardly a factor in today's meta. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Lightning Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezio Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 [align=center]It's not a bad idea ;)You just haven't really pulled it off!Get the correct OCG ;)[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Actually PSYCHIC is a real Yugioh type. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroGamer379 Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 BAD pics... Here is what I would do: Instead of just getting them and putting them in a card, I would get a background, put it in paint, then paste your pic in there, and fix the white stuff around it in Paint. THEN adjust the image so it looks somewhat like a square (Or export the image to a program that lets you crop the image like a square) then put it on a card. I know that sounds like a lot of work and it somewhat is but the turnout afterwords is great. But otherwise this is a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PyroWildcat Posted March 21, 2009 Report Share Posted March 21, 2009 Actually PSYCHIC is a real Yugioh type. :P I know' date=' and I said as much. Problem is, the Psychic Type in Yu-Gi-Oh is the only one that actually has a consistent theme in the effects of the monsters in it. You can read all about it here. If we rate cards by their playability in the metagame, which I tend to do, slapping the Psychic Type on monsters that don't actually reflect the effects of Psychic Type monsters hurts this particular quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonic01 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Well contrary to every one else I lik em cause I don't care about OCG and the pics are nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H4LOeffect Posted March 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Your the first guy to like my cards! Haleluhyah! Thank you Sonic01! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonicsora123 Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 U ask me i think their good. They good effects and reasonable ATK and DEF 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.