[Ø] Gastly «-» Haunter «-» Gengar [Ø]

[╬「Selatcia」╬]

[align=center]

[/align]

 

[spoiler=[b]Effect - Gastly[/b]]All face-up monsters that would be destroyed by battle by this card are instead flipped into face-down Defense Position. The DEF of monsters flipped face-down by this effect are treated as 0.

 

[spoiler=[b]Effect - Haunter[/b]]This card can only be Summoned by Tributing 1 "Gastly" you control. When this card is Summoned, your opponent loses Life Points equal to the number of monsters on his/her field flipped into face-down Defense Position by the effect of "Gastly" x 200. During your opponent's 2nd End Phase after this card was Summoned, all face-down monsters on his/her field are sent to the Graveyard.

 

[spoiler=[b]Effect - Gengar[/b]]This card can only be Summoned by Tributing 1 "Haunter" you control. Once per turn, during either player's Battle Phase, you can select 1 monster your opponent controls. It loses ATK and DEF equal to the number of monsters sent to the Graveyard by the effect of "Haunter" x 200. If this card is destroyed by battle, flip the attacking monster into face-down Defense Position at the end of the Damage Step.

 

 

 

Pic Credit:

 

Gastly

Haunter

Gengar

[.Requiem]

I like theses sorta, I don't like haunter, but gengar is cool.

[That Fat Guy]

Interesting way to interpret Dream Eater, which is what I'm guessing they're doing. My only beef with them is that the cards flipped face down can easily be flipped face up again. Maybe add something like "Monsters in Face-Down Defense Position cannot be flipped face up while you control this card."

[bribri123123]

Love em! 9.5/10 :)

[LostLetter227]

Interesting way to interpret Dream Eater' date=' which is what I'm guessing they're doing. My only beef with them is that the cards flipped face down can easily be flipped face up again. Maybe add something like "Monsters in Face-Down Defense Position cannot be flipped face up while you control this card."

[/quote']

 

Then it would be slightly OP.

 

I see a slight few OCG, but I'm afraid to speak since the cards are creative and awesome on their own. XD

 

Edit: May I suggest Zombie-Type?

[That Fat Guy]

Interesting way to interpret Dream Eater' date=' which is what I'm guessing they're doing. My only beef with them is that the cards flipped face down can easily be flipped face up again. Maybe add something like "Monsters in Face-Down Defense Position cannot be flipped face up while you control this card."

[/quote']

 

Then it would be slightly OP.

 

I think we have vastly different definitions of OP. Monsters can still be played in attack mode (and with these guys' meager attack scores, they'll get run over rather easily), and monsters that get flipped face up by being attacked can change their battle position. The only things set in defense position are walls and flip effect monsters. Walls don't care about not moving and flip effect monsters would still get their effects when attacked by ghastly. In fact, if I had a flip effect monster down, I would want my opponent to have the "non-OP" ghastly, because I could keep crashing my flipper and gaining its effect over and over again. I think without something like that, they're unusable.

[Tronta]

fiend is fine for ghosts, imo.

 

but op? are you kidding?

have you ever even played yugioh?

gastly has 1300. it has to attack things to flip them.

not only that

it has to attack AND destroy things to flip them.

its useless even if you did add that clause. now beef it to 16, and we can talk.

 

from there, its not op, in fact its under powered, as the opponent gets to keep shields.

 

moving on:

haunter is an 1800 nomi.

stop me if youve heard this one before.

furthermore, he counts as your normal summon.

its useless.

now his effect? terrible. 2nd end phase? your opponent will flip everything up the first chance he gets. they would have to be forced to stay that way. and even then, so what? they would have died anyway when ghastly killed them. haunter burns though, so hes redeemed a little.

 

gengar is a 22 nomi that counts as your normal summon.

stupid.

first, hes a nomi, so you can up it to level 8. the only reason a card should be level 7 is if its not a nomi. then it would be abusable from the grave. theres no harm in making this tradein fodder, especially since it will be a dead draw half the time.

now, his effect? stupid. bad version of shrink. you may as well use burden of the mighty or shrink.

i like his last effect, but force it to keep them in face down def.

 

also, attacks should go up to

16, 22, and 24 respectively.

 

good idea though.

[dbatesman91™]

i really like them.the pics are f**kin awesome.

 

cool effects 9.9/10 because im jelous of them.:)

[.:Abarai Renji:.]

STILL EPIC!!

 

EPIC/10

 

A request(if you take requests?): Could you make cards of Ralts, Kirlia and Gardevoir? PLZZZZZZ?

[HoboJoe]

I don't know if anyone spotted this. . .but in Gengar's effect, atacking = attacking.

 

Other than that, great cards. Me loves teh Gengar! :D 9/10

[╬「Selatcia」╬]

Fixed the written effect; too lazy to change the card. XD

 

Thanks.

[.:Abarai Renji:.]

A request(if you take requests?): Could you make cards of Ralts' date=' Kirlia and Gardevoir? PLZZZZZZ?

[/quote']