Easter

[Raelen]

Are you Religious?: Heck' date=' yeah!!!

What do you believe?: Christianity

Why do you believe it?: [b']Because the theory of evolution has sooooo many holes in it![/b]

Do you celebrate Easter?: I sure do! It's a very important day!

I lol'd

 

I lol'd

 

You have no idea.. ^_^

 

@ Riku: Well, it has yet to be proven wrong...

 

It's better than the bible.

 

Like in the beginning in the bible, God made 2 humans and they were then cast out of Eden. Then they had 2 boys. Then Cain killed Able and wandered the earth for a while and then all of the sudden there were a lot more humans.

 

The bible was a child of it's time, it has since been proven wrong.

 

Really?? Can you show me the proof please, because obviously you've already found it.

 

Dinosaurs. There I've proved the bible wrong.

 

The Bible actually mentions the existence of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are proven by scripture.

 

 

I would like to ask Raelen' date=' what holes?

[/align'][/color][/font]

 

This reminds me of a quote by Darwin:

 

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selections, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

 

If the very creator of the evolution theory doubts his own theory, that's not a very good sign, now is it?

 

All the small details of anything in creation from the largest animal to the smallest cell are extremely complex! The chances that all the amazing detail were created by complete total dumb luck are astronomical!!

 

Now, if the theory of evolution were true, we should see a lot of connecting links between creatures today. And we don't. Also, no connecting links between creatures have been found in the fossil record. (None that can be proven, anyway.)

 

So basically, the theory of evolution states that absolute nothing exploded, creating billions of planets and stars and cells, and placing small blobs of life in small pools of water on earth. I'm sorry if I see that as a little far fetched.

---

 

Have you heard of something called DNA? It connects us to other animals. Chimps have 98% of the same DNA as us.

 

Yes, I am aware of DNA. As is this scientist:

 

"While many evolutionists proclaim that human DNA is 98% identical to chimpanzee DNA, few would lie by idly and allow themselves to receive a transplant using chimpanzee organs. As a matter of fact, American doctors tried using chimp organs in the 1960s, but in all cases the organs were totally unsuitable. The claim of 98% similarity between chimpanzees and humans is not only deceptive and misleading, but also scientifically incorrect. Today, scientists are finding more and more differences in DNA from humans and chimps. For instance, a 2002 research study proved that human DNA was at least 5% different from chimpanzees—and that number probably will continue to grow as we learn all of the details about human DNA."

 

It's still a link.

 

Tell me, when in history does the bible put dinosaurs?

 

The Book of Job is one of the oldest books ever written. In it, God tells Job of his greatness as Creator and describes an animal, called Behemoth, as follows:

 

Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you; He eats grass like an ox. Behold now, his strength in his loins, And his power in the muscles of his belly. He bends his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are tubes of bronze; His limbs are like bars of iron. ( Job 40:15–18 )

 

Marginal notes in most Bibles speculate that Behemoth was probably an elephant or a hippopotamus, but those animals have tails like ropes. Behemoth had a “tail like a cedar.” Any animal with a tail as huge and strong as a cedar tree is probably a dinosaur. Job 40:19–24 describes this giant, difficult-to-capture animal as not alarmed by a raging river. If the writer of Job knew of a dinosaur, then the evolution position is wrong, and man saw dinosaurs.

 

Of course, you decide your interpretation however you want.

 

If dinosaurs and humans would have lived in the same period of time, then humans would have gone extinct. Tyrannosaurus Rex alone would be the end of us.

 

Congratulations you have failed at this debate. Good day to you.

 

Lol, whatever. You're ignorant. See ya'. ^_^

 

(By the way, Tyrannosaurus was a bad choice to use. It's likely that it was just a scavenger.)

[Ezio]

Are you Religious?:Yes' date=' I'm A Strict Nangist

What do you believe?: That I'm Nang :D

Why do you believe it?: Because It Makes Perfect Sense To A Nangsome Person

Do you celebrate Easter?: No I Celebrate Neaster The Nanger Version.

[/quote']

 

[align=center]

Finally a religion I can relate to :lol:

[/align]

[Lelouch Lamperouge]

Lol :lol:

I Would Make A Real One If I Wasn't So Busy.

[Ezio]

[align=center]

Of course you would...

[/align]

[Nnoitra Jiruga]

Raelen basically stole all my votes!

[Davok]

 

Are you Religious?: Heck' date=' yeah!!!

What do you believe?: Christianity

Why do you believe it?: [b']Because the theory of evolution has sooooo many holes in it![/b]

Do you celebrate Easter?: I sure do! It's a very important day!

I lol'd

 

I lol'd

 

You have no idea.. ^_^

 

@ Riku: Well, it has yet to be proven wrong...

 

It's better than the bible.

 

Like in the beginning in the bible, God made 2 humans and they were then cast out of Eden. Then they had 2 boys. Then Cain killed Able and wandered the earth for a while and then all of the sudden there were a lot more humans.

 

The bible was a child of it's time, it has since been proven wrong.

 

Really?? Can you show me the proof please, because obviously you've already found it.

 

Dinosaurs. There I've proved the bible wrong.

 

The Bible actually mentions the existence of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are proven by scripture.

 

 

I would like to ask Raelen' date=' what holes?

[/align'][/color][/font]

 

This reminds me of a quote by Darwin:

 

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selections, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

 

If the very creator of the evolution theory doubts his own theory, that's not a very good sign, now is it?

 

All the small details of anything in creation from the largest animal to the smallest cell are extremely complex! The chances that all the amazing detail were created by complete total dumb luck are astronomical!!

 

Now, if the theory of evolution were true, we should see a lot of connecting links between creatures today. And we don't. Also, no connecting links between creatures have been found in the fossil record. (None that can be proven, anyway.)

 

So basically, the theory of evolution states that absolute nothing exploded, creating billions of planets and stars and cells, and placing small blobs of life in small pools of water on earth. I'm sorry if I see that as a little far fetched.

---

 

Have you heard of something called DNA? It connects us to other animals. Chimps have 98% of the same DNA as us.

 

Yes, I am aware of DNA. As is this scientist:

 

"While many evolutionists proclaim that human DNA is 98% identical to chimpanzee DNA, few would lie by idly and allow themselves to receive a transplant using chimpanzee organs. As a matter of fact, American doctors tried using chimp organs in the 1960s, but in all cases the organs were totally unsuitable. The claim of 98% similarity between chimpanzees and humans is not only deceptive and misleading, but also scientifically incorrect. Today, scientists are finding more and more differences in DNA from humans and chimps. For instance, a 2002 research study proved that human DNA was at least 5% different from chimpanzees—and that number probably will continue to grow as we learn all of the details about human DNA."

 

It's still a link.

 

Tell me, when in history does the bible put dinosaurs?

 

The Book of Job is one of the oldest books ever written. In it, God tells Job of his greatness as Creator and describes an animal, called Behemoth, as follows:

 

Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you; He eats grass like an ox. Behold now, his strength in his loins, And his power in the muscles of his belly. He bends his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are tubes of bronze; His limbs are like bars of iron. ( Job 40:15–18 )

 

Marginal notes in most Bibles speculate that Behemoth was probably an elephant or a hippopotamus, but those animals have tails like ropes. Behemoth had a “tail like a cedar.” Any animal with a tail as huge and strong as a cedar tree is probably a dinosaur. Job 40:19–24 describes this giant, difficult-to-capture animal as not alarmed by a raging river. If the writer of Job knew of a dinosaur, then the evolution position is wrong, and man saw dinosaurs.

 

Of course, you decide your interpretation however you want.

 

If dinosaurs and humans would have lived in the same period of time, then humans would have gone extinct. Tyrannosaurus Rex alone would be the end of us.

 

Congratulations you have failed at this debate. Good day to you.

 

Lol, whatever. You're ignorant. See ya'. ^_^

 

(By the way, Tyrannosaurus was a bad choice to use. It's likely that it was just a scavenger.)

 

 

The fact that your stating that humans lived alongside dinosaurs obviously means that you failed your Science class miserably and is trying to make up for it by spouting random crap.

[PrometheusMFD]

Are you Religious?: Yeppers

What do you believe?: Christianity (a combination of Lutherism and Catholocism) Jesus FTW

Why do you believe it?: Because based on what people say, everything is too circumstantial

Do you celebrate Easter?: Yes!

 

I got a freaking 2 foot tall chocolate bunny. I am predicting Diabetes in the near future. :P

[Careless Whisper]

Are you Religious?:

Not at all.

 

What do you believe?:

I am agnostic, meaning I consider the possibility of any one religion of being true. Therefore, everyone single one could be true, or none could be true, or just a few, or only one.

 

Why do you believe it?:

Because no one theory nor religion has the correct amount or the correct type of proof to become true. Which is much more logical than even Darwin's theory of evolution and even Neuton's Laws of Physics.

 

Do you celebrate Easter?:

I don't celebrate the meaning behind it, but I always enjoy some candy here and there.

[PrometheusMFD]

Are you Religious?:

Not at all.

 

What do you believe?:

I am agnostic' date=' meaning I consider the possibility of any one religion of being true. Therefore, everyone single one could be true, or none could be true, or just a few, or only one.

 

Why do you believe it?:

Because no one theory nor religion has the correct amount or the correct type of proof to become true. Which is much more logical than even Darwin's theory of evolution and even Neuton's Laws of Physics.

 

Do you celebrate Easter?:

I don't celebrate the meaning behind it, but I always enjoy some candy here and there.

[/quote']

 

Easter without celebrating the ressurection of Jesus is just holloween with your family.

[Careless Whisper]

Are you Religious?:

Not at all.

 

What do you believe?:

I am agnostic' date=' meaning I consider the possibility of any one religion of being true. Therefore, everyone single one could be true, or none could be true, or just a few, or only one.

 

Why do you believe it?:

Because no one theory nor religion has the correct amount or the correct type of proof to become true. Which is much more logical than even Darwin's theory of evolution and even Neuton's Laws of Physics.

 

Do you celebrate Easter?:

I don't celebrate the meaning behind it, but I always enjoy some candy here and there.

[/quote']

 

Easter without celebrating the ressurection of Jesus is just holloween with your family.

 

I really don't care. Celebrating the meaning behind Easter is for religious people. I have already stated that I am not religious, so I have no reason to celebrate the meaning behind Easter.

 

You can celebrate Easter without celebrating Jesus's ressurection. Some peeps do the same thing for Christmas.

[Raelen]

 

Are you Religious?: Heck' date=' yeah!!!

What do you believe?: Christianity

Why do you believe it?: [b']Because the theory of evolution has sooooo many holes in it![/b]

Do you celebrate Easter?: I sure do! It's a very important day!

I lol'd

 

I lol'd

 

You have no idea.. ^_^

 

@ Riku: Well, it has yet to be proven wrong...

 

It's better than the bible.

 

Like in the beginning in the bible, God made 2 humans and they were then cast out of Eden. Then they had 2 boys. Then Cain killed Able and wandered the earth for a while and then all of the sudden there were a lot more humans.

 

The bible was a child of it's time, it has since been proven wrong.

 

Really?? Can you show me the proof please, because obviously you've already found it.

 

Dinosaurs. There I've proved the bible wrong.

 

The Bible actually mentions the existence of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are proven by scripture.

 

 

I would like to ask Raelen' date=' what holes?

[/align'][/color][/font]

 

This reminds me of a quote by Darwin:

 

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selections, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

 

If the very creator of the evolution theory doubts his own theory, that's not a very good sign, now is it?

 

All the small details of anything in creation from the largest animal to the smallest cell are extremely complex! The chances that all the amazing detail were created by complete total dumb luck are astronomical!!

 

Now, if the theory of evolution were true, we should see a lot of connecting links between creatures today. And we don't. Also, no connecting links between creatures have been found in the fossil record. (None that can be proven, anyway.)

 

So basically, the theory of evolution states that absolute nothing exploded, creating billions of planets and stars and cells, and placing small blobs of life in small pools of water on earth. I'm sorry if I see that as a little far fetched.

---

 

Have you heard of something called DNA? It connects us to other animals. Chimps have 98% of the same DNA as us.

 

Yes, I am aware of DNA. As is this scientist:

 

"While many evolutionists proclaim that human DNA is 98% identical to chimpanzee DNA, few would lie by idly and allow themselves to receive a transplant using chimpanzee organs. As a matter of fact, American doctors tried using chimp organs in the 1960s, but in all cases the organs were totally unsuitable. The claim of 98% similarity between chimpanzees and humans is not only deceptive and misleading, but also scientifically incorrect. Today, scientists are finding more and more differences in DNA from humans and chimps. For instance, a 2002 research study proved that human DNA was at least 5% different from chimpanzees—and that number probably will continue to grow as we learn all of the details about human DNA."

 

It's still a link.

 

Tell me, when in history does the bible put dinosaurs?

 

The Book of Job is one of the oldest books ever written. In it, God tells Job of his greatness as Creator and describes an animal, called Behemoth, as follows:

 

Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you; He eats grass like an ox. Behold now, his strength in his loins, And his power in the muscles of his belly. He bends his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are tubes of bronze; His limbs are like bars of iron. ( Job 40:15–18 )

 

Marginal notes in most Bibles speculate that Behemoth was probably an elephant or a hippopotamus, but those animals have tails like ropes. Behemoth had a “tail like a cedar.” Any animal with a tail as huge and strong as a cedar tree is probably a dinosaur. Job 40:19–24 describes this giant, difficult-to-capture animal as not alarmed by a raging river. If the writer of Job knew of a dinosaur, then the evolution position is wrong, and man saw dinosaurs.

 

Of course, you decide your interpretation however you want.

 

If dinosaurs and humans would have lived in the same period of time, then humans would have gone extinct. Tyrannosaurus Rex alone would be the end of us.

 

Congratulations you have failed at this debate. Good day to you.

 

Lol, whatever. You're ignorant. See ya'. ^_^

 

(By the way, Tyrannosaurus was a bad choice to use. It's likely that it was just a scavenger.)

 

 

The fact that your stating that humans lived alongside dinosaurs obviously means that you failed your Science class miserably and is trying to make up for it by spouting random crap.

 

Well, I can't help the fact that the person I quoted thought that. I actually have no idea whether to believe it or not. I should've deleted that..

 

@ Holy Babylon: Watch your mouth.

I believe your views but you don't have to use foul language to get your point across.

[Zeroshot]

Are you Religious?:

Not at all.

 

What do you believe?:

I am agnostic' date=' meaning I consider the possibility of any one religion of being true. Therefore, everyone single one could be true, or none could be true, or just a few, or only one.

 

Why do you believe it?:

Because no one theory nor religion has the correct amount or the correct type of proof to become true. Which is much more logical than even Darwin's theory of evolution and even Neuton's Laws of Physics.

 

Do you celebrate Easter?:

I don't celebrate the meaning behind it, but I always enjoy some candy here and there.

[/quote']

 

Easter without celebrating the ressurection of Jesus is just holloween with your family.

 

I really don't care. Celebrating the meaning behind Easter is for religious people. I have already stated that I am not religious, so I have no reason to celebrate the meaning behind Easter.

 

You can celebrate Easter without celebrating Jesus's ressurection. Some peeps do the same thing for Christmas.

 

Technically, Easter isn't about Jesus anymore.

Unless Jesus was a magical, reincarnation bunny, Easter has lost its meaning.

[PrometheusMFD]

Are you Religious?:

Not at all.

 

What do you believe?:

I am agnostic' date=' meaning I consider the possibility of any one religion of being true. Therefore, everyone single one could be true, or none could be true, or just a few, or only one.

 

Why do you believe it?:

Because no one theory nor religion has the correct amount or the correct type of proof to become true. Which is much more logical than even Darwin's theory of evolution and even Neuton's Laws of Physics.

 

Do you celebrate Easter?:

I don't celebrate the meaning behind it, but I always enjoy some candy here and there.

[/quote']

 

Easter without celebrating the ressurection of Jesus is just holloween with your family.

 

I really don't care. Celebrating the meaning behind Easter is for religious people. I have already stated that I am not religious, so I have no reason to celebrate the meaning behind Easter.

 

You can celebrate Easter without celebrating Jesus's ressurection. Some peeps do the same thing for Christmas.

 

Technically, Easter isn't about Jesus anymore.

Unless Jesus was a magical, reincarnation bunny, Easter has lost its meaning.

 

Yeah, a bunch of stuff in easter makes no sense, but what are you going to do?

[Davok]

 

Are you Religious?: Heck' date=' yeah!!!

What do you believe?: Christianity

Why do you believe it?: [b']Because the theory of evolution has sooooo many holes in it![/b]

Do you celebrate Easter?: I sure do! It's a very important day!

I lol'd

 

I lol'd

 

You have no idea.. ^_^

 

@ Riku: Well, it has yet to be proven wrong...

 

It's better than the bible.

 

Like in the beginning in the bible, God made 2 humans and they were then cast out of Eden. Then they had 2 boys. Then Cain killed Able and wandered the earth for a while and then all of the sudden there were a lot more humans.

 

The bible was a child of it's time, it has since been proven wrong.

 

Really?? Can you show me the proof please, because obviously you've already found it.

 

Dinosaurs. There I've proved the bible wrong.

 

The Bible actually mentions the existence of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are proven by scripture.

 

 

I would like to ask Raelen' date=' what holes?

[/align'][/color][/font]

 

This reminds me of a quote by Darwin:

 

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selections, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

 

If the very creator of the evolution theory doubts his own theory, that's not a very good sign, now is it?

 

All the small details of anything in creation from the largest animal to the smallest cell are extremely complex! The chances that all the amazing detail were created by complete total dumb luck are astronomical!!

 

Now, if the theory of evolution were true, we should see a lot of connecting links between creatures today. And we don't. Also, no connecting links between creatures have been found in the fossil record. (None that can be proven, anyway.)

 

So basically, the theory of evolution states that absolute nothing exploded, creating billions of planets and stars and cells, and placing small blobs of life in small pools of water on earth. I'm sorry if I see that as a little far fetched.

---

 

Have you heard of something called DNA? It connects us to other animals. Chimps have 98% of the same DNA as us.

 

Yes, I am aware of DNA. As is this scientist:

 

"While many evolutionists proclaim that human DNA is 98% identical to chimpanzee DNA, few would lie by idly and allow themselves to receive a transplant using chimpanzee organs. As a matter of fact, American doctors tried using chimp organs in the 1960s, but in all cases the organs were totally unsuitable. The claim of 98% similarity between chimpanzees and humans is not only deceptive and misleading, but also scientifically incorrect. Today, scientists are finding more and more differences in DNA from humans and chimps. For instance, a 2002 research study proved that human DNA was at least 5% different from chimpanzees—and that number probably will continue to grow as we learn all of the details about human DNA."

 

It's still a link.

 

Tell me, when in history does the bible put dinosaurs?

 

The Book of Job is one of the oldest books ever written. In it, God tells Job of his greatness as Creator and describes an animal, called Behemoth, as follows:

 

Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you; He eats grass like an ox. Behold now, his strength in his loins, And his power in the muscles of his belly. He bends his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are tubes of bronze; His limbs are like bars of iron. ( Job 40:15–18 )

 

Marginal notes in most Bibles speculate that Behemoth was probably an elephant or a hippopotamus, but those animals have tails like ropes. Behemoth had a “tail like a cedar.” Any animal with a tail as huge and strong as a cedar tree is probably a dinosaur. Job 40:19–24 describes this giant, difficult-to-capture animal as not alarmed by a raging river. If the writer of Job knew of a dinosaur, then the evolution position is wrong, and man saw dinosaurs.

 

Of course, you decide your interpretation however you want.

 

If dinosaurs and humans would have lived in the same period of time, then humans would have gone extinct. Tyrannosaurus Rex alone would be the end of us.

 

Congratulations you have failed at this debate. Good day to you.

 

Lol, whatever. You're ignorant. See ya'. ^_^

 

(By the way, Tyrannosaurus was a bad choice to use. It's likely that it was just a scavenger.)

 

 

The fact that your stating that humans lived alongside dinosaurs obviously means that you failed your Science class miserably and is trying to make up for it by spouting random crap.

 

Well, I can't help the fact that the person I quoted thought that. I actually have no idea whether to believe it or not. I should've deleted that..

 

Um, you were the one who said that humans coexisted with dinosaurs. >.< He was the one who said that wasn't true.

[Raelen]

 

Are you Religious?: Heck' date=' yeah!!!

What do you believe?: Christianity

Why do you believe it?: [b']Because the theory of evolution has sooooo many holes in it![/b]

Do you celebrate Easter?: I sure do! It's a very important day!

I lol'd

 

I lol'd

 

You have no idea.. ^_^

 

@ Riku: Well, it has yet to be proven wrong...

 

It's better than the bible.

 

Like in the beginning in the bible, God made 2 humans and they were then cast out of Eden. Then they had 2 boys. Then Cain killed Able and wandered the earth for a while and then all of the sudden there were a lot more humans.

 

The bible was a child of it's time, it has since been proven wrong.

 

Really?? Can you show me the proof please, because obviously you've already found it.

 

Dinosaurs. There I've proved the bible wrong.

 

The Bible actually mentions the existence of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are proven by scripture.

 

 

I would like to ask Raelen' date=' what holes?

[/align'][/color][/font]

 

This reminds me of a quote by Darwin:

 

“To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selections, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree.”

 

If the very creator of the evolution theory doubts his own theory, that's not a very good sign, now is it?

 

All the small details of anything in creation from the largest animal to the smallest cell are extremely complex! The chances that all the amazing detail were created by complete total dumb luck are astronomical!!

 

Now, if the theory of evolution were true, we should see a lot of connecting links between creatures today. And we don't. Also, no connecting links between creatures have been found in the fossil record. (None that can be proven, anyway.)

 

So basically, the theory of evolution states that absolute nothing exploded, creating billions of planets and stars and cells, and placing small blobs of life in small pools of water on earth. I'm sorry if I see that as a little far fetched.

---

 

Have you heard of something called DNA? It connects us to other animals. Chimps have 98% of the same DNA as us.

 

Yes, I am aware of DNA. As is this scientist:

 

"While many evolutionists proclaim that human DNA is 98% identical to chimpanzee DNA, few would lie by idly and allow themselves to receive a transplant using chimpanzee organs. As a matter of fact, American doctors tried using chimp organs in the 1960s, but in all cases the organs were totally unsuitable. The claim of 98% similarity between chimpanzees and humans is not only deceptive and misleading, but also scientifically incorrect. Today, scientists are finding more and more differences in DNA from humans and chimps. For instance, a 2002 research study proved that human DNA was at least 5% different from chimpanzees—and that number probably will continue to grow as we learn all of the details about human DNA."

 

It's still a link.

 

Tell me, when in history does the bible put dinosaurs?

 

The Book of Job is one of the oldest books ever written. In it, God tells Job of his greatness as Creator and describes an animal, called Behemoth, as follows:

 

Behold now, Behemoth, which I made as well as you; He eats grass like an ox. Behold now, his strength in his loins, And his power in the muscles of his belly. He bends his tail like a cedar; The sinews of his thighs are knit together. His bones are tubes of bronze; His limbs are like bars of iron. ( Job 40:15–18 )

 

Marginal notes in most Bibles speculate that Behemoth was probably an elephant or a hippopotamus, but those animals have tails like ropes. Behemoth had a “tail like a cedar.” Any animal with a tail as huge and strong as a cedar tree is probably a dinosaur. Job 40:19–24 describes this giant, difficult-to-capture animal as not alarmed by a raging river. If the writer of Job knew of a dinosaur, then the evolution position is wrong, and man saw dinosaurs.

 

Of course, you decide your interpretation however you want.

 

If dinosaurs and humans would have lived in the same period of time, then humans would have gone extinct. Tyrannosaurus Rex alone would be the end of us.

 

Congratulations you have failed at this debate. Good day to you.

 

Lol, whatever. You're ignorant. See ya'. ^_^

 

(By the way, Tyrannosaurus was a bad choice to use. It's likely that it was just a scavenger.)

 

 

The fact that your stating that humans lived alongside dinosaurs obviously means that you failed your Science class miserably and is trying to make up for it by spouting random crap.

 

Well, I can't help the fact that the person I quoted thought that. I actually have no idea whether to believe it or not. I should've deleted that..

 

Um, you were the one who said that humans coexisted with dinosaurs. >.< He was the one who said that wasn't true.

 

Well, there are some people making a case for that, but I don't 100% believe it myself.

What I actually said was that God may've referred to dinosaurs in that passage. Whether they were alive then or not is not known.

 

The debate is over now.

[Ezio]

[align=center]

Well easter is over.

This is now just turning into a heated debate :D

[/align]

[Skuldur]

The debate is over. Raelen just hasn't accepted defeat.