How do you think/want the world to end?

[Legend Zero]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava, molten rock and fire

[bury the year]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw your towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being foolish.

[bury the year]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw your towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being foolish.

[bury the year]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw your towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being foolish.

[Legend Zero]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw the towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being correct.

 

Where in that did I say they used oxygen? Just because now there are no animals that don't use it doesn't mean it can't happen. I use the plants that use photosynthesis in the darkest part of the ocean as an example to prove that evolution can occur so that some species of animal doesn't have to use oxygen.

 

I belive that your narrow mindedness is causing you to not see or understand clearly. Evolution can be interpreted as many ways as a person imaginations allows. You believe in what the majority does, but just because there are more that believe something doesn't make it true. =P

[Legend Zero]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw the towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being correct.

 

Where in that did I say they used oxygen? Just because now there are no animals that don't use it doesn't mean it can't happen. I use the plants that use photosynthesis in the darkest part of the ocean as an example to prove that evolution can occur so that some species of animal doesn't have to use oxygen.

 

I belive that your narrow mindedness is causing you to not see or understand clearly. Evolution can be interpreted as many ways as a person imaginations allows. You believe in what the majority does, but just because there are more that believe something doesn't make it true. =P

[Legend Zero]

How is that common sense? Were you there to see if single-celled organism were the only things? No you weren't! You believe in evolution but your not open-minded. I find it quiet possible that there were more than singled-cell organisms then. There were animals that could surivive the harsh conditions of Earth durings it's early live. But I'm done here because the only thing you care to do is argue instead of looking at another point of view.

 

PS: Earth was never covered in acid. Only lava' date=' molten rock and fire

[/quote']

 

And here is where I throw the towel in the ring.

 

Animals could not have survived. It's not only common sense, it's biological fact. The chemicals in the atmosphere would have made air-processing organisms impossible to develop until the Earth cooled down.

 

You are simply being correct.

 

Where in that did I say they used oxygen? Just because now there are no animals that don't use it doesn't mean it can't happen. I use the plants that use photosynthesis in the darkest part of the ocean as an example to prove that evolution can occur so that some species of animal doesn't have to use oxygen.

 

I belive that your narrow mindedness is causing you to not see or understand clearly. Evolution can be interpreted as many ways as a person imaginations allows. You believe in what the majority does, but just because there are more that believe something doesn't make it true. =P

[B3lly N3rd]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

[B3lly N3rd]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

[B3lly N3rd]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

[ayy lmao]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

[ayy lmao]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

[ayy lmao]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

[bury the year]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

 

Read this, then. You'l see why that's been disproved.

[bury the year]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

 

Read this, then. You'l see why that's been disproved.

[bury the year]

lol did the topic change??....how is the world gonna end..its easy....a meteor gonna blast pluto off its axis then pluto is gonna knock another planet off its axis and so on and so forth until they reach earth..which eventually will plunge into the sun destroying life as we know it..

 

It is thought a meteor will hit earth in 2012 called Niburu or something.

 

Read this, then. You'l see why that's been disproved.

[B3lly N3rd]

yea lol something about the crystal skulls or something

[B3lly N3rd]

yea lol something about the crystal skulls or something

[B3lly N3rd]

yea lol something about the crystal skulls or something

[ThisGuy777]

Crystal skulls? You mean the thing they based the new Indiana jones on? And I agree with Legend Zero in the sense that lving creatures don't always need oxygen. Humans are very closeminded creatures who only believe in what they can prove or what they can in no way disprove. For example: The living organisims on earth need oxygen simply because the way they turned out as the planet changed. I think if the planet had come out differently there still could be life it would just be different. Living organisims evolve and adapt to their environment so on a planet with no oxygen there still could be life, it just would rely on whatever it's planet has to offer instead of oxygen. :?

 

Oh and, what if all the bombs on the planet went off at once and caused the planet to move out of orbit so we collide with mars! That would be crazy cause it would happen slowly so you could see mars getting closer and closer until the 2 planet's finally collide.

[ThisGuy777]

Crystal skulls? You mean the thing they based the new Indiana jones on? And I agree with Legend Zero in the sense that lving creatures don't always need oxygen. Humans are very closeminded creatures who only believe in what they can prove or what they can in no way disprove. For example: The living organisims on earth need oxygen simply because the way they turned out as the planet changed. I think if the planet had come out differently there still could be life it would just be different. Living organisims evolve and adapt to their environment so on a planet with no oxygen there still could be life, it just would rely on whatever it's planet has to offer instead of oxygen. :?

 

Oh and, what if all the bombs on the planet went off at once and caused the planet to move out of orbit so we collide with mars! That would be crazy cause it would happen slowly so you could see mars getting closer and closer until the 2 planet's finally collide.

[Roxus Arctic wolfe]

nuclear war us humans are gunna f**k it up look wats already happened to it global warming and s**t

[Roxus Arctic wolfe]

nuclear war us humans are gunna f**k it up look wats already happened to it global warming and s**t

[Legend Zero]

Crystal skulls? You mean the thing they based the new Indiana jones on? And I agree with Legend Zero in the sense that lving creatures don't always need oxygen. Humans are very closeminded creatures who only believe in what they can prove or what they can in no way disprove. For example: The living organisims on earth need oxygen simply because the way they turned out as the planet changed. I think if the planet had come out differently there still could be life it would just be different. Living organisims evolve and adapt to their environment so on a planet with no oxygen there still could be life' date=' it just would rely on whatever it's planet has to offer instead of oxygen. :?

 

Oh and, what if all the bombs on the planet went off at once and caused the planet to move out of orbit so we collide with mars! That would be crazy cause it would happen slowly so you could see mars getting closer and closer until the 2 planet's finally collide.

[/quote']

 

You iz me new friend. ;-)

[ThisGuy777]

TY :)