Jericho Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Makaveli~ Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I like the quality and the image really good. I do like that it's House for the image though. and the background is amazing how do you do that because I'm new at GIMP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Shore Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 holy sex!me likey :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ Chidori-Kun Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 How did you get that effect? its so smexy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haseo Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Love the sig! I think you have gotten much better. Can you pm or post what effect you did? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durandamon Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 Love the sig! I think you have gotten much better. Can you pm or post what effect you did? Also' date=' do you use Gimp or PS?[/quote'] Brushless GIMP Signature Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 it looks like the simple cloud effect that you find on pdn. brushless sigs on gimp aren't anything majorly impressive. but its not horrible....just plain, no/little depth. meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted May 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 it looks like the simple cloud effect that you find on pdn. It there is one thing I can assure you of, it's that I used no cloud effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 because gimp has no cloud effect that im aware of. maybe, a few gradient maps, with lowered opacity then some simple blurs...motion probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neilsweaky Posted May 13, 2009 Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 I use GIMP for my PokeSplice Shop.It works wonders. Great Image, BTW. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted May 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2009 because gimp has no cloud effect that im aware of. maybe' date=' a few gradient maps, with lowered opacity then some simple blurs...motion probably.[/quote'] Well it has difference clouds. Nope. Only one gradient map. Only one blur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Text. EWWW.Monotone. EWWW.Depthless. EWWWNo Lighting. EWWW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasu Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 A bit monotone >. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ŞťřïЖЄѓ™ Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Okay, I may be no GIMP siggy expert, but that sure looks good for a brushless siggy. ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codypops Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Did you smudge the pic to make the BG? 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 The BG looks like a Gaussian Blur on Zoom with a few other lays and sharpening effects on it. How many layers used? Oh and it lacks... uniqueness, its kinda simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Text. EWWW.Monotone. EWWW.Depthless. EWWWNo Lighting. EWWW. This.Also the render looks cutoff at the ears imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Text. EWWW.Monotone. EWWW.Depthless. EWWWNo Lighting. EWWW. This.Also the render looks cutoff at the ears imo. I dictate... It was a failed blending attempt. Also, Smudge > Filters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harhar Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Text. EWWW.Monotone. EWWW.Depthless. EWWWNo Lighting. EWWW. This.Also the render looks cutoff at the ears imo. I dictate... It was a failed blending attempt. Also' date=' Smudge > Filters[/quote'] Oh, you're probably right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Text. EWWW.Monotone. EWWW.Depthless. EWWWNo Lighting. EWWW. This.Also the render looks cutoff at the ears imo. I dictate... It was a failed blending attempt. Also' date=' Smudge > Filters[/quote'] Oh, you're probably right. Dang. Thats a first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 The BG looks like a Gaussian Blur on Zoom with a few other lays and sharpening effects on it. How many layers used? Oh and it lacks... uniqueness' date=' its kinda simple.[/quote'] 8 layers including text layer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted May 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.