EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 This topic has been deleted (basically) in favor of a new style of doing this project. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Hearts™ Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 fake types. Me do not like them. OCG is very good, although sacrifice=tribute. Say tribute instead of sacrifice.Also, When saying something like "On your Battle Phase" or something like that, say "During your battle Phase". Rating without rating pics: 8/10Rating with rating pics: 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duplicitous Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 fake types. Me do not like them. OCG is very good' date=' although sacrifice=tribute. Say tribute instead of sacrifice.Also, When saying something like "On your Battle Phase" or something like that, say "During your battle Phase". Rating without rating pics: 8/10Rating with rating pics: 7/10[/quote'] Hmm, well, I just found it was easier to use fake types that match the Pokemon types then trying to use real types, cause in the end, their weaknesses and resistances are equal to their weaknesses and resistances on the games and such by doing that. @everyone so far: Wow, thanks for the great replies so far everyone ^^ I actually expected a lot of "hate posts" from the start. No one ever seems to read the bolded text, and I seem to get more people who post things I ask them not to post when I ask it then when I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Hearts™ Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Well, the types of pokemon could easily be replaced with yugioh types, example: Builbasaur=plantCHarmander=PyroSquirtle=AquaCaterpie=Insect You get the idea... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Pierce Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 Fake types, Not the best OCG, 8/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 "Not the best OCG" if it's wrong, tell me what's wrong so I can fix it. Didn't I say that? >> Sorry...that just bugs me when people do that. Also, yes, fake types. Is the use of fake types REALLY that big of a deal? I mean...seriously...I'm making them as close to real pokemon as possible...is that really such a big problem? >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 pics suck, fake-types,multi-typedOCG is off. Meh. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 New cards added: 31-47, 138-143, 494-496, 500, and 503 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skytin Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 Stupid pics man, use good pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 Seriously dude, you do need better images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 @Marvel and Skytin: Seriously, did you two even read the first post? If you had, you would notice that I specifically said that I am not aiming to put good pictures on these, I am using the game sprites, because I got tired of searching for pictures when I found the best pictures I could find were to rip the pictures off the pokemon cards themselves. I have all 493 pokemon in game sprites, so I plan to use those. The image for Mysterious Fossil is a rip off of a pokemon card (thus it can't be a bad image) and Oracion...let's see you come up with something else for that. All in all, stop rating my pictures. I want to know what you think about the cards and their effects. If I have to, I will take the cards down and replace them with YVD format if it is the only way to shut you guys up about the freakin' pictures. So, STOP RATING MY PICTURES, CAUSE THEY AREN'T GOING TO GET BETTER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 ^ They are just trying to make a suggestion. That's what happens when you post a card; people rate it, picture, effect, and all.If you ever need better pictures, you can try photobucket.com. =DAnyways, it's pretty cool! Hope you get to 500. ^_^Remember, sacrifice = Tribute. :D-Yoshi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpartanGio Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 This set would be great if not for the bad and old ocg and the HORRIBLE pics7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 ^ They are just trying to make a suggestion. That's what happens when you post a card; people rate it' date=' picture, effect, and all.If you ever need better pictures, you can try photobucket.com. =DAnyways, it's pretty cool! Hope you get to 500. ^_^Remember, sacrifice = Tribute. :D-Yoshi[/quote'] Well, I realize they are trying to make suggestions, but when I specifically asked people not to rate the images and the only thing they have to say is "bad images" it kind of bugs me...I might remake these with better images once they are all done, but I just want to get these done. I want people to rate the effects and tell me if they should be changed. I was thinking of just uploading cards with no images, but I was worried I'd get "WHERE'S THE IMAGE?!" or something as the only response, so I HOPED that if I put "Don't rate the images, just the effects, ATK, DEF, etc." that people would ignore the images...but no one has so far and it's ticking me off. I want to know how good my cards are, but if people are going to only care about the images, I might have to take these off and replace them with a non-image form, which I'm not sure if that's ok here, since we're supposed to post our cards made with Yu-Gi-Oh Card Maker. I could easily post the YVD forms of them, though, and I might if people won't stop freaking out about the images. I know their bad, but I'm not going to spend 20 days looking for pictures when I have images of them all already. Also, on the sacrifice thing, someone did mention that sacrifice = tribute, and I've fixed that in the YVD form. All the new cards will have tribute instead of sacrifice, but I'm not going to edit 40 some cards and repost them up for just one word ^^" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Pierce Posted May 20, 2009 Report Share Posted May 20, 2009 All the trainer cards are OPed with 5000 ATK and DEF. Bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 All the trainer cards are OPed with 5000 ATK and DEF. Bad idea. The point of them having so much is so that they are stronger then the Pokemon. On top of that, they can't even attack at all, so why would it be overpowered? It doesn't count as a monster (or so I thought), so you can direct attack if that is the only monster on the field, and if you manage to destroy it (difficult, but possible) your opponent loses the duel. How is that overpowered? If it really IS overpowered, then tell me how to fix it, cause I can't fix an overpowered card if I don't know what to do with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeREVOLUTION Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 really good effects and ocg. bad pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Pierce Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 All the trainer cards are OPed with 5000 ATK and DEF. Bad idea. The point of them having so much is so that they are stronger then the Pokemon. On top of that' date=' they can't even attack at all, so why would it be overpowered? It doesn't count as a monster (or so I thought), so you can direct attack if that is the only monster on the field, and if you manage to destroy it (difficult, but possible) your opponent loses the duel. How is that overpowered? If it really IS overpowered, then tell me how to fix it, cause I can't fix an overpowered card if I don't know what to do with it.[/quote'] Lower the ATK and DEF. They are unrealistic with ATK and DEF over 4000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Lower the ATK and DEF. They are unrealistic with ATK and DEF over 4000. ... Unrealistic? You do know there's about 3-4 tournament legal Yu-Gi-Oh cards that have 5000 ATK right? >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye Pierce Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Well, just do whatever you want with your cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Added the rest of the set between 31-60 (not sure which weren't already up). I'll be moving on to 61-90 soon. Anyone got any ideas for the legendaries? I'm having trouble with that so far. Their type will be "/Legendary" instead of "/Pokemon" which will make it so that Silver's effect can't auto-summon Legendaries. I need Moltres, Articuno, Zapdos, Mewtwo, and Mew the most, but I'll take any of them. Also note, all legendaries (with the exception of some of the Sinnoh ones) will be level 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camtown Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Funny, because unlike the Pokemon game, it actually pays off to have all of the same type. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmilyAnnCoons Posted May 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Umm...I don't understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeREVOLUTION Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 i dont understand why everything is common Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.