Huntar! Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 if they beg for reps that they want, shouldn't that be against the rules? Positive or negative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-Hero Kyle Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Yeah, I've already told this to the mod who posted the rules in Generals according to reps begging but he said it is only negs so why? I support this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 oh please' date=' dont be trying to sratch your way out o' this, your caught and your being delt with now.[hr']Nazello is a negbegger big time, his reps are -168 L34rn 2 C0unt, -163 i have explained this already. it's not me who is making these negs, it's my supporters. and without my supporters, my negs mean nothing. if you see my rep, you obviously know more people are against than for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.tacos Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Stupid rule is stupid.If a person wants negs' date=' so what. Its not exactly a positive mark, in fact it's a statement of stupidity.And Negs never are a factor in moderation AT ALL. So no, I don't support.[/quote'] thank you icy. We want negs. So what? It's not a big deal. How does it even bother people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunako Kirishiki Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 RAEG AT THIS THREAD!!!!!!!! Did someone say... RAEG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 RAEG AT THIS THREAD!!!!!!!! Did someone say... RAEG Yes... RAEG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted May 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Stupid rule is stupid.If a person wants negs' date=' so what. Its not exactly a positive mark, in fact it's a statement of stupidity.And Negs never are a factor in moderation AT ALL. So no, I don't support.[/quote'] Oh well. It's just my opinion, and I wanted to see if anyone was behind it. Supporters added. Bee tea dubs, Taco and Naz, post in my thread one more time without any positive contribution, and you're getting reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Shreck123Mr.TacosdEMONIa ARE ALL GOING DOWN!!!! I support! AND BTW' date=' THE ULES STATE NO BEGGING FOR REPS! IT CAN MEAN NEGS! HAHAHAHAHA! WE HAVE THE RULES ON OUR SIDE!!!!!![/size']NOOOOOO p.s. I don't beg I ask Mr.Tacos, it's one against lots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I can agree to this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Traveler Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maliki Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I was just negged for giving 3 positive reps to Nazello, formerly demonia. See why I support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I was just negged for giving 3 positive reps to Nazello' date=' formerly demonia. See why I support?[/quote'] someone who supported rep spammed and claims i was rep spamming by -repping because of the fact the he was rep spamming. see why i don't support? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I'm not the first to give you positives, you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 I'm not the first to give you positives' date=' you know.[/quote'] i'm not blind, you know. i just would rather report someone for hypocrisy rather than a good, cruel sense of humor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.tacos Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 me and Nazello don't neg beg, we ask for negs. The difference? neg begging-GIVE ME A NEG!!!!!!! GIVE ME A NEG!!!!!! PLEEEEEEAAAAASSE I WILL DO ANYTHIIIIIIINGGGGG!!!!!111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlickimenT Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Reputation was made for the USERS behaviour and stuff, not childish games involving Negs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Reputation was made for the USERS behaviour and stuff' date=' not childish games involving Negs[/quote']Someone with sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Reputation was made for the USERS behaviour and stuff' date=' not childish games involving Negs[/quote'] at first it was simply to prove how stupid and worthless reps were, sort of a rebellion. then, it became a hobby. childish only represents how stupid people rep spam and make double acc to raise their little number that people judge you upon. it's like judging a book by it's cover. it takes the fun out of meeting people for who they really are. i used to frown upon people like pupil. now i find out for myself tl;dr: don't judge a book by it's rep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrickyPooBoy Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 If you look at someone's rep, and they have -162 negs, then they either fail at the site and spam out of their wits or are begging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 If you look at someone's rep' date=' and they have -162 negs, then they either fail at the site and spam out of their wits or are begging.[/quote'] and i used to have 48 +rep with less posts than you, so i would have though i was better than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlickimenT Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Reputation was made for the USERS behaviour and stuff' date=' not childish games involving Negs[/quote'] at first it was simply to prove how stupid and worthless reps were, sort of a rebellion. then, it became a hobby. childish only represents how stupid people rep spam and make double acc to raise their little number that people judge you upon. it's like judging a book by it's cover. it takes the fun out of meeting people for who they really are. i used to frown upon people like pupil. now i find out for myself tl;dr: don't judge a book by it's rep Dont judge a neg begger by speeches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted May 25, 2009 Report Share Posted May 25, 2009 Reputation was made for the USERS behaviour and stuff' date=' not childish games involving Negs[/quote'] at first it was simply to prove how stupid and worthless reps were, sort of a rebellion. then, it became a hobby. childish only represents how stupid people rep spam and make double acc to raise their little number that people judge you upon. it's like judging a book by it's cover. it takes the fun out of meeting people for who they really are. i used to frown upon people like pupil. now i find out for myself tl;dr: don't judge a book by it's rep Dont judge a neg begger by speeches i don't beg' date=' i say i want them, an people give them. i simply state my opinion. not beg[/quote'] at least i have a reason to argue >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.