Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 However the apostophe is also used to define posestion, MWAHAHA!! eg/ This card's blank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 No, possession = cards' , to replace the second s. its just cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Opponent's side of the field I win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Opponent's side of the field I win. Opponent controls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 "increase the ATK of this card by 500 points." this example from exodia necross suggests that "Halve this cards ATK and DEF for each card in your hand." should be rephrased: Halve the ATK and DEF of this card for each card in your hand. am i right now? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 "increase the ATK of this card by 500 points." this example from exodia necross suggests thatincrease this cards ATK by 500 "Halve this cards ATK and DEF for each card in your hand." should be rephrased: Halve the ATK and DEF of this card for each card in your hand. am i right now :3 no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 ;~; how come? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Opponent's side of the field I win. Opponent controls. Irelivant I won. The ATK belongs to the card the same way the field belongs to the opponent. "Card's ATK", "opponents's field". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 OMG marvel you were so busy looking at the pick we didn't realize its a lvl 2 monster with 2500 atk and 3000 def!(felix look at my ocg edit of your edits) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 He wanted the OCG fixing, not the card balancing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 ohes...this is awkward. :O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 lol. I was looking at his pic, but I still followed his comment below it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 OMG marvel you were so busy looking at the pick we didn't realize its a lvl 2 monster with 2500 atk and 3000 def!(felix look at my ocg edit of your edits) With one card in hand it has 1250 ATK, I see no problems. It'd be a beast in Skill Drain though. @Marvel: Did I win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 I still feel 100% certain with my fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Except you missed the apostrophe... What about? "Halve the ATK and DEF of this card" That way the apostrphe becomes irrelivant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 The ATK and DEF of this card becomes halved. There's a lot of ways to say it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 "increase the ATK of this card by 500 points." this example from exodia necross suggests thatincrease this cards ATK by 500 "Halve this cards ATK and DEF for each card in your hand." should be rephrased: Halve the ATK and DEF of this card for each card in your hand. am i right now :3 no http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Card_Errata:Exodia_Necrossthis is an example of a card, you cant edit the ocg (lol) :Pknowing this shouldn't you change your fixes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Old OCG is old. Find a card from the 5D editions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 D: oh noes! "This card's ATK" this example from montage dragon (http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Montage_Dragon) means that felix wins! ;) too bad marvel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 So... 'This card is battle position cannot be changes... O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 sigh, we all knew it was going to happen eventually:/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 What do you mean? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 he won! D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Oh how lol. My OCG fix seemed correct IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eternal Duelist Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 look at my example up above :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.