lol at the people with glads on here

[Argentum]

You guys are so pro.

 

Mosnters - 17

Rescue Cat x2

Test Tiger x3

Prisma

Laquari x3

Equeste

Secutor

Bestiari

Samnite x2

Murmillo

Darius

PoC

 

Magics 12

Cold Wave x3

Book of Moon x3

Brain Control

Enemy Controller x2

Proving Ground x2

Heavy Storm

Monster Reborn

 

Traps 11

Solemn Judgment x3

Bottomless Trap Hole x3

War Chariot x3

Waboku

[Akira]

-Proving Ground

+Sangan

[Argentum]

Sangan is slow as crap dude...Never works. If anything help me get another waboku in here without taking out a monster...and no don't drop a book or an econ...tried it.

[Akira]

General Consensus at the Nats was that a new ruling was introduced saying that Waboku didn't let Glads tag, however I haven't been able to find any evidence backing this claim, so...

[Argentum]

thats what I thought, but no one could prove it to me so I put the waboku back in.

[Smeg]

Other Glads on this site > This.

 

Akira is right.

[Argentum]

Can you prove it?

[Smeg]

Well, only a few, mainly coz half the poeple on ycm are nubs. But look at any good players glad decks.

[Argentum]

Like whose? You still haven't shown me anything. All you've said is that I suck for no real reason.

 

This thing sets so much back row you can't do anything to it. Meet the newest version out of me. Usually I set four and a summon a glad first turn...in the next two turns I win from having overwhelming control.

[Smeg]

I didn't say you suck. I'm just sick of these 'I'm better then you' titles.

 

Bunter Dwayne posted one.

 

But you say stuff like "Summoner Monk is awful in glads".

[Argentum]

How is this a I'm better than you title? I'm just giggling at all the glads around here. So out of date that's all. Anyway. I might run one summoner monk if I can get it before regionals, but I doubt it. So I guess I'll just have to do without it.

 

I did try them out before. They were honestly not the best thing ever. Just made it easy to make a wall to stall for a couple of turns.

 

Give me the link. I'm not going to go look for it.

[Akira]

The problem with Monk is that it loses you games in the mirror match =/

[Tickle Me Emo]

How is this a I'm better than you title? I'm just giggling at all the glads around here. So out of date that's all. Anyway. I might run one summoner monk if I can get it before regionals' date=' but I doubt it. So I guess I'll just have to do without it.

 

I did try them out before. They were honestly not the best thing ever. Just made it easy to make a wall to stall for a couple of turns.

 

Give me the link. I'm not going to go look for it.

[/quote']

 

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-116868.html

^Thats a build better than this

[Argentum]

Okay. No its not and I'm going to tell you why.

 

Crow should be sided. If you are just using it to get crush card guess what...crush card with three targets makes a luck sack deck promise.

 

Laquari should be maxed. How else are you going to attack over other people's beatsticks? Let me tell you what happens to me every time I take out one laquari. I get stuck. They just summon stratos and lol at me when they figure out whats going on. Its not worth the risk because I've lost to many games to it.

 

Hoplomus shouldn't be used in my opinion because the stupid thing never stops anything. If you like it that much then side it and play it like a trap dustshoot. Only when you are going first.

 

Respite makes the deck even more luck sack. When I tried it. It never worked because I'd draw the stupid thing and not have any targets in hand. That's when you say FML. So not only are you depending on getting lucky enough to pull a crow and a crushcard to hand. You are also depending on being lucky enough to get two targets for respite in hand.

 

I don't run torrential anymore in the main deck. It screws me up. I lose a monster and with only 17 I'm all about keeping my monsters.

 

Overall dude. Your build is inconsistent sorry to say.

[arkel]

*sigh*

 

Monsters -18-

3 Test Tiger

2 Samnite

2 Rescue Cat

2 Laquari

2 Darius

1 Prisma

1 Retiari

1 Hoppy Hippo

1 Bestiari

1 Equeste

1 Murmillo

1 Secutor

 

Spells -15-

3 Cold Wave

3 E-Con

3 Book of Moon

1 Brain Control

1 Soul Taker

1 MST

1 Trunade

1 Storm

1 Reborn

 

Traps -7-

3 Solemn

3 War Chariot

1 Torrential

 

Total: 40

[Argentum]

Soul taker? Good joke. You are worse than me when I put smashing ground in this thing instead of 3 laquari.

[Tickle Me Emo]

Okay. No its not and I'm going to tell you why.

 

Crow should be sided. If you are just using it to get crush card guess what...crush card with three targets makes a luck sack deck promise.

 

Laquari should be maxed. How else are you going to attack over other people's beatsticks? Let me tell you what happens to me every time I take out one laquari. I get stuck. They just summon stratos and lol at me when they figure out whats going on. Its not worth the risk because I've lost to many games to it.

 

Hoplomus shouldn't be used in my opinion because the stupid thing never stops anything. If you like it that much then side it and play it like a trap dustshoot. Only when you are going first.

 

Respite makes the deck even more luck sack. When I tried it. It never worked because I'd draw the stupid thing and not have any targets in hand. That's when you say FML. So not only are you depending on getting lucky enough to pull a crow and a crushcard to hand. You are also depending on being lucky enough to get two targets for respite in hand.

 

I don't run torrential anymore in the main deck. It screws me up. I lose a monster and with only 17 I'm all about keeping my monsters.

 

Overall dude. Your build is inconsistent sorry to say.

 

I got news for you... the deck is very consistent. You just seem like to much of a bad player to see the value in some of the cards in there. Example being Hoplomus. He isnt just a defive GB, hes also a mind game one. You dont know how many times Ive made people make the wrong move because I set a Bestiari when they thought I set Hoplomus. If your opponent knos your playing hoplomus they are gonna be afraid to attack your def. Crow, yes it is very good in sidedeck but its also very main deckable. Expecially when people wont think you aremaining the damn thing. Crush works way to well. I NEVER had it sitting in my hand waiting for a target for more than 2 turns, which would be if I had it opening hand only.

[arkel]

Soul taker? Good joke. You are worse than me when I put smashing ground in this thing instead of 3 laquari.

 

Oh I'm sorry, 1-for-1s that allow you to choose the target are bad now?

[Tickle Me Emo]

Soul taker? Good joke. You are worse than me when I put smashing ground in this thing instead of 3 laquari.

 

Oh I'm sorry' date=' 1-for-1s that allow you to choose the target are bad now?

[/quote']

because Argentum is so "pro" and probably thinks that giving your opponent 1000 lp is going to screw you over

[Argentum]

I got news for you... the deck is very consistent. You just seem like to much of a bad player to see the value in some of the cards in there. Example being Hoplomus. He isnt just a defive GB' date=' hes also a mind game one. You dont know how many times Ive made people make the wrong move because I set a Bestiari when they thought I set Hoplomus. If your opponent knos your playing hoplomus they are gonna be afraid to attack your def. Crow, yes it is very good in sidedeck but its also very main deckable. Expecially when people wont think you aremaining the damn thing. Crush works way to well. I NEVER had it sitting in my hand waiting for a target for more than 2 turns, which would be if I had it opening hand only.

[/quote']

 

Sounds kinda arrogant to say I'm too bad of a player to see that I'm doing it wrong.

Hoplomus is a mind game, but you don't need hoplomus to play the hippo guessing game. If you play glads most people assume you run a hippo.

 

Crow is pointless when the only thing you have it for is to stop a monster reborn. More than two turns? Everything in my deck is useful the turn I get it. I usually don't have anything sitting in my hand waiting to be played at the right time dude. So whose build is faster?

 

Soul taker? Good joke. You are worse than me when I put smashing ground in this thing instead of 3 laquari.

Oh I'm sorry' date=' 1-for-1s that allow you to choose the target are bad now?

[/quote']

 

Its unnecessary. You have books and e-cons. Just flip the shiz and kill it. I say that's better than giving the opponent a free 1k. If you run the three laquari, I promise you will never have a problem with a big monster that you have to smash, fissure, or soul take.

[Argentum]

No one agreeing or disagreeing?

[BlueEyesShiningDragon4Z]

Okay. No its not and I'm going to tell you why.

 

Crow should be sided. If you are just using it to get crush card guess what...crush card with three targets makes a luck sack deck promise.

 

Laquari should be maxed. How else are you going to attack over other people's beatsticks? Let me tell you what happens to me every time I take out one laquari. I get stuck. They just summon stratos and lol at me when they figure out whats going on. Its not worth the risk because I've lost to many games to it.

 

Hoplomus shouldn't be used in my opinion because the stupid thing never stops anything. If you like it that much then side it and play it like a trap dustshoot. Only when you are going first.

 

Respite makes the deck even more luck sack. When I tried it. It never worked because I'd draw the stupid thing and not have any targets in hand. That's when you say FML. So not only are you depending on getting lucky enough to pull a crow and a crushcard to hand. You are also depending on being lucky enough to get two targets for respite in hand.

 

I don't run torrential anymore in the main deck. It screws me up. I lose a monster and with only 17 I'm all about keeping my monsters.

 

Overall dude. Your build is inconsistent sorry to say.

 

I got news for you... the deck is very consistent. You just seem like to much of a bad player to see the value in some of the cards in there. Example being Hoplomus. He isnt just a defive GB' date=' hes also a mind game one. You dont know how many times Ive made people make the wrong move because I set a Bestiari when they thought I set Hoplomus. If your opponent knos your playing hoplomus they are gonna be afraid to attack your def. Crow, yes it is very good in sidedeck but its also very main deckable. Expecially when people wont think you aremaining the damn thing. Crush works way to well. I NEVER had it sitting in my hand waiting for a target for more than 2 turns, which would be if I had it opening hand only.

[/quote']

 

yes mind games r fun and help to win, but some players dont fear the unknown and will go after you with all they got regardless of what you might have, also just because a card works for you doesnt mean it'll work for someone else so its all a matter of testing it out for yourself and seeing what works for you.

anyways nice deck 9/10

[Argentum]

Hey guys, I have a good question. I took out my second equeste for a poc. I'll just update it. Tell me what you think.

[Tickle Me Emo]

Hey guys' date=' I have a good question. I took out my second equeste for a poc. I'll just update it. Tell me what you think.

[/quote']

 

I dont see a single question in that post, just several statements. PoC seems like a kool kind of tech, I woulda used it personally if I had it, but its like a crush at my locals... no one has the funker.

[Dad]

Crow is pointless when the only thing you have it for is to stop a monster reborn.

 

Stardust. And that's not including his Buster.

 

And where's the extra deck?