LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 [align=center]:D :D[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rook Bishop Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Really like the pic but what with the Attribute. Basically if you have a high level data monster you can summon it back by offering up a Lower level data monster. Also defense is mispelled. overall 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Defence is spelt correctly. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Defense is spelled like that. Check a dictionary. Even look at other people's cards. Very awesome though. But ya, a little OVP'd on the secondary effect. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I love the ignorance of America people who don't know the difference in the spelling between the two countries >_> Also the effect is really meh, the image is fine. Custom attribute is cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rook Bishop Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Defense is spell with a 'defense' not 'defence'. That Defence like taking apart 'mostly liking a fence' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Thanks Mirage. And yes its DEFENCE!!! Not Defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Defense is spell with a 'defense' not 'defence'. That Defence like taking apart 'mostly liking a fence' Fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 These n00bs that can't spell are thick. It's 'Defence'. Anyway, more rates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I simply wanted to say, nvm. I believe you live in a different country than us, so if anything, you are spelling different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rook Bishop Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 just check his profile. So his spelling will probably be different from our. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Well it's staying as 'Defence'. I will not change my spelling just to make you happy. More rates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 nice idea thought^^cool custom attribute^^9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 So nobody thinks the Attribute is a waste or would be better suited to a Type or Arch-Type? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGai675 Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 it was actually weird seeing the custom attribute made by someone like you (who sticks to the rules). I thought you woould criticize somebody for adding a custom attributeother than that 8/10, i thought the effect was too bland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 So nobody thinks the Attribute is a waste or would be better suited to a Type or Arch-Type? Honestly' date=' after you went to the trouble of editing the card and making the neat symbol, I don't think anyone here's anal enough to tell you to change it back to LIGHT. But since you mention it, [b']Don't make fake attributes, newb! This is freaking Realistic Cards omgnomnom!1!1!!!!!1!10001![/b] /endsarcasm Card is OK, but I don't know anything about your DATA attribute, so it's hard to judge. 8.5/10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I was playing with the rules. And I wont mock new Attributes. Unless it's stupid and not realistic. As long as the card seems usable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeaux Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I prefer it as an Arch-Type cuz I dont like Custom attributes (But this one is pretty cool)Rate -> 7.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Well, I have another STEEL Attribute. But yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 "Defense" and "Defence" are the same word. One is the American Spelling, and one is used by a lot of other countries. The card is ridiculously broken and creates a 2-3 card FTK. You can just Tribute this monster and Special Summon it or another copy of itself along with Card of Safe Return on the field to draw your whole Deck in one turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted June 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 I'm not as good as Yugioh, and I'm not good at combo's or anything. I hardly play Yugioh, but I just make the cards. So it's hard to make them un-broken as I'm not familiar with other 'new' cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.