Jump to content

My best deck


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

[align=center]Kenta, you fail worse a

than a donkey without legs being eaten alive by a praying mantis with AIDS.[/align]

Stuck nice to see a semi decent deck by a new member with some originality

Wow' date=' this got stuck. =o

[/quote']

Congrats to BSD :D

 

I don't believe it =O.

im sorry' date=' but this is unworthy of the sticky.

you are missing one card.

 

i see no redrum.

[/quote']

JesusofChaos stuck this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's decent, but... could be better.

 

Going down the list, I'm going to start with Prime Material Dragon. When released, it wasn't that bad a tech. With the release of Synchros, however, looking at him questions one thing: efficiency. Compared to the can-do Stardust Dragon and every other Synchro Monster, you start to question if Prime Material Dragon has that. Unfortunately, it doesn't. It becomes an eyesore when in the hand, and the Synchros that can run it over will be on the field generations before it will. A nice thought of dumping Dragons to the Graveyard, but that job is best left to Future Fusion and Foolish Burial.

 

In their place, I have three recommendations: Twin-Headed Behemoth, Cyber Dragon, and of course, Black Salvo. All three provide efficiency for a field with some pretty offensive monsters, and all have the benefit of shaping Cyberdarks into the newer generation of Synchros. Cyber Dragon I would help is explanatory, while Twin-Headed Behemoth comes back for that Synchro opportunity. Last but certainly not least, I'm wondering why you have never considered Black Salvo for this deck. Simply put, you're playing Cyberdarks, and you have THE strongest, most bad-ass Synchro monster in this format: Dark Strike Fighter. Makes sense, doesn't it?

 

Going further down the list, you should also know that Dark World Dealings is a no. Recommended choices in its place would be Card Destruction, or Gold Sarcophagus. If you decide to play Gold Sarcophagus at two, then it's recommended that you take out either 1 Cyberdark Impact!, the Dragon's Mirror, or Giant Trunade for the second. Overall, pretty solid for the deck.

 

Your Traps are half-good. Threatening Roar is fantastic in this format, Dark Bribe is terrible. In a game where swarm, damage, and games are made without the use of Spells/Traps, it sees no need and only mouth-feeds your opponent card advantage. Solemn Judgment is recommended, but with the direction this game is going it's now a preference rather than a mandatory play.

 

Assuming you lack the Solemn Judgment, I would fix the deck as so: -3 Dark Bribe, +3 Bottomless Trap Hole. -1 Threatening Roar, +1 standard Mirror Force. This basic lineup, as bad as this format can go with the swarm, can potentially shut down the majority of that swarm. Dark Bribe only works against you in that aspect.

 

Synchros are fine, but you never really require Stardust Dragon at 3. I would recommend bringing him down to 2, and Red Dragon Archfiend to 1, and make room for two Colossal Fighter. A Magical Android is nice for the variable aspect, but overall not needed.

 

Hope this gives you some ideas, and for the best.

 

P.S. - I would suggest when you post a list, you don't do single after single, but instead like such:

 

1 Dark Armed Dragon

2 Cyberdark Edge

2 Cyberdark Horn

2 Cyberdark Keel

 

and so on.

 

P.S.S. - To all of you who keep spitting the same words out of your mouth at the OP, saying "THE DECK'S NOT EVEN 40!!", especially you Tronta, try to have the intelligence to think for yourself and have the mind to double-count the OP's list card-by-card. There are 19 monsters, not 18. The deck is at the legal 40-card limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

erm.

if youll notice, i didnt say it was illegal you troll.

dont skim peoples posts if you intend to trash them.

 

i told him that with so many dragons, he needs to run redrum.

that was it.

furthermore...

'think for yourself'?

what does that even mean?

am i thinking for other people?

 

pretentious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...