Archelaus Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsleyduel Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 that might work you should probaly lower the attack more thoughbut good card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlickimenT Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 I really like it! could kill you, and van be ruined by block attack or card rotator or sometin.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Necro Pheonix Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 no keep the attack the same. i love the balancing effect10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earthbound Ojamortal! Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Increase its ATK to 2800 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 thank god for Skill Drain so you only have to pay up 1000 LP instead, though I would have reduced the damage to 2600 to balance it out 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Stoner-™ Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 The Effect seems decently balanced. So i'm not going to go into that. The OCG seems perfect. So I guess i'll head straight to the ratings: Name - 8/10.Pic - 5/10.Effect - 9/10.Total - 22/30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 thank god for Skill Drain so you only have to pay up 1000 LP instead ^This. The idea is good; though maybe add a small positive effect to balance it, rather than reducing the damage. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Great way to balance the effect. 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.