.:JBM:. Posted July 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 25, 2009 Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 I think I can actually build this, minus the D-Draws, of course. I really like your concept overall, but there are minor details that I don't like all over. Perhaps I'll build my version and see how it fairs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 I think I can actually build this' date=' minus the D-Draws, of course. I really like your concept overall, but there are minor details that I don't like all over. Perhaps I'll build my version and see how it fairs.[/quote'] kk, please pm me what you come up with that you think is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted July 25, 2009 Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 Awesome deck!!!!9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2009 Awesome deck!!!!9/10 thanks, but more in depth comments and advice is preffered over ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 I've tested this quite a bit lately, and the updates have been fantastic, giving me occasional combos such as Trunade on Swords right before 3rd turn so that swords works for 5 turns. TWRA on Junk Synchron (synchron can be used for other synchro summons for more firepower). Overall: Great. I think I'd like to neg a Hand Destruction for a 2nd TWRA. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 **Updated** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 26, 2009 Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 I've tested this quite a bit lately' date=' and the updates have been fantastic, giving me occasional combos such as Trunade on Swords right before 3rd turn so that swords works for 5 turns. TWRA on Junk Synchron (synchron can be used for other synchro summons for more firepower). Overall: Great. I think I'd like to neg a Hand Destruction for a 2nd TWRA. Thoughts?[/quote'] I support that notion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kidchaor Posted July 26, 2009 Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 i would not know i about the meta(since i will never use meta decks.EVER!) so if your deck is good for meta take it out for a test run. if ya need me i will drink my Mtn. Dew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 26, 2009 Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 i would not know i about the meta(since i will never use meta decks.EVER!) so if your deck is good for meta take it out for a test run. if ya need me i will drink my Mtn. Dew. Stop trying to look cool and give out sheet advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 Thanks tea, comments guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted July 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2009 After some serious consideration, I have decided not to buy CCV. The price is outrageous and due to some september banlist sneak peeks, CCV will get banned. Any replacement suggestion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted September 12, 2009 Report Share Posted September 12, 2009 BUMP. Update this for September, please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted September 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 BUMP. Update this for September' date=' please?[/quote'] Ermm... Please don't necrobump. Anyway, sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted September 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2009 *Updated* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted September 15, 2009 Report Share Posted September 15, 2009 Finally someone shows the power of Junk Synchron. This deck is great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 15, 2009 Report Share Posted September 15, 2009 I thought 2 Foolish conflicted? I can't think of any fixes, looks good man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rose Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Awesome deck! But i would add a marshmellow in. maybe for spirit reaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Finally someone shows the power of Junk Synchron. This deck is great! Thanks' date=' lol I thought 2 Foolish conflicted? I can't think of any fixes, looks good man. Er... What does it conflict with? Anyway, one of them dumps Calc if I need to. If not, I dump Junk or a D-Hero so that I can scoop it with Warrior returning alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted September 16, 2009 Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Finally someone shows the power of Junk Synchron. This deck is great! Thanks' date=' lol I thought 2 Foolish conflicted? I can't think of any fixes, looks good man. Er... What does it conflict with? Anyway, one of them dumps Calc if I need to. If not, I dump Junk or a D-Hero so that I can scoop it with Warrior returning alive. I don't know, you are the one that said more than 1 was bad, said there wasn't more than one target. It looks good, just confused me. BUMP Also I was thinking something like this: -1 Foolish Burial (1 is dead no matter what)-2 DWD +1 Swords oRL+1 The Warrior Returning Alive+1 Upstart DWD has been pissing me off lately' date=' because of its retarded discard requirement. 1 Upstart has been fine, because the OTK is usually more than enough w/ help. Foolish only had 1 target so running 2 was BS. The Warrior Returning Alive gives me back discarded shizz, and I've been hesitating between swords and Scapegoat. Both are great, but swords would give 1 more target for D-Dude. Please say what you think![/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted September 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2009 Finally someone shows the power of Junk Synchron. This deck is great! Thanks' date=' lol I thought 2 Foolish conflicted? I can't think of any fixes, looks good man. Er... What does it conflict with? Anyway, one of them dumps Calc if I need to. If not, I dump Junk or a D-Hero so that I can scoop it with Warrior returning alive. I don't know, you are the one that said more than 1 was bad, said there wasn't more than one target. It looks good, just confused me. BUMP Also I was thinking something like this: -1 Foolish Burial (1 is dead no matter what)-2 DWD +1 Swords oRL+1 The Warrior Returning Alive+1 Upstart DWD has been pissing me off lately' date=' because of its retarded discard requirement. 1 Upstart has been fine, because the OTK is usually more than enough w/ help. Foolish only had 1 target so running 2 was BS. The Warrior Returning Alive gives me back discarded shizz, and I've been hesitating between swords and Scapegoat. Both are great, but swords would give 1 more target for D-Dude. Please say what you think![/quote'] Yeah, sorry, though that was a few months ago. Also, I wasn't running the warrior returning alive at that time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xazeon Posted September 17, 2009 Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 +1 Plaguespreader? Might not work. Is this IRL? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:JBM:. Posted September 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2009 +1 Plaguespreader? Might not work. Is this IRL?Nope. it doesn't really help the OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.