Archelaus Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This card can attack directly. This card can attack twice per turn. When this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent, your opponent must draw 2 cards and discard 1 card. When this card is sent from the field to the Graveyard, both players draw 5 cards and discard 5 cards. This card can attack directly. This card can attack twice per turn. When this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent, your opponent discards 2 cards and increases his/her Life Points by 1500. When this card is sent from the field to the Graveyard, both players discard 3 cards and increases their Life Points by 2500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 They seem pretty reasonable. I think that the effects suit the cards their with. Ecstasy of The Dark could definately be useful against LS, cause it would mill decks extremely quick. Ecstasy of the Light..... Hmmm... I'm thinking of how it could be used, but I'm not sure yet. I'd have to say they're pretty solid in my eyes. 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadons_Avenger™ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Alot of OCG errors and a little basic just basic effects thrown together to make a long effect other then tht there ok cards:6/10OCG:4/10Total:5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacikus Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 10/10 Awesome pics OCG to effects are ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 OCG errors? Like what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Abadons, he has no OCG errors, and I think you can't criticize. The card in your Sig has about.... 18-20 errors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Thanks YugiohPro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadons_Avenger™ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 yes i know my sig has errors and its not supposed to be a put down dont get me wrong This card can attack directly. is 1 ocg error that i spoted sorry to cause a fuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schitzofrenic Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This is probably played in conjuction with other spell cards. That the positive effect becomes a negative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 yes i know my sig has errors and its not supposed to be a put down dont get me wrong This card can attack directly. is 1 ocg error that i spoted sorry to cause a fuss This card can attack directly isn't an ocg error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Dude, you are extremely lost. His OCG is perfect. I have made cards that use that in their effect, and everyone says that is correct. Trust me Abadons, your simply mistaking a lot of things in a small predicament which is highly against the altercation of any error you think of finding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 the effects look just fine. I don't see any OCG errors, though for pic, Ecstasy of the Dark is meh 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadons_Avenger™ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 isnt it supposed to be this card can attack your opponents life points directly?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted July 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2009 actually, they shortened it to this card can attack directly. The one you said was from the old ocg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
◊ Hᵃᵏᵃˢᵉ ◊ Posted July 7, 2009 Report Share Posted July 7, 2009 Ya. A lot has changed in the current Meta. And I mean a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abadons_Avenger™ Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 sorry i usually dont get new cards and i stick with the old lvl 4 1900 1s that people call OP'D so sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted July 8, 2009 Report Share Posted July 8, 2009 it is resonable. pic are a little meh. OCG is ok. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.