Crow™ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I tried this in my WC09 Exodia deck (for da lulz) and it suprisingly good. Although I won more duels by attacking (in Exodia, yes) for the game. So let's discuss this:Also, we might get this in the new Warrior's structure deck. Don't know why though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Future Fusion + This is pretty much all it has going for it, and that's still really bad. Nobody really cares about this card. At all. Really. This is terrible in Exodia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesirson Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 We will probably get it because the Gemininess of the new Warrior-deck, and this cards like Geminis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This is terrible in Exodia.I know. It was because I was bored. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This is terrible in Exodia.I know. It was because I was bored. Being bored doesn't somehow make a card that was terrible in Exodia any good in Exodia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This is terrible in Exodia.I know. It was because I was bored. Being bored doesn't somehow make a card that was terrible in Exodia any good in Exodia.-.- I know, it worked OK for me though. It was wierd Exodia though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I was expecting this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 I was expecting this: 1 Good card does not make the entire vanilla universe a playable type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 lol guys! Did you miss the part? xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 lol guys! Did you miss the part? xD Honestly? I have no idea what the **** your topic titles mean anymore. So no, but it doesn't even matter if I saw it or not because who knows what the **** it was supposed to mean in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Well it's not that bad. I mean, it sends pieces of Exodia to the Grave, with a chance to be D.D cro- Yeah. It fails hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 This card is hilarious to randomly spam into a Gemini or Vanilla deck. and that SUCKS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Lesse. It's not "Super", because it sucks. It's not "Fighting", because it is designed to win by effect, not by ATK. It's not a "Robot", because it blatantly isn't. It's not related to "Egypt", because it was introduced in GX and had no connection to Egypt at all. And it isn't stylish. So, the topic title is pretty much solid stupidity. As is to be expected from SD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 Lesse. It's not "Super"' date=' because it sucks. It's not "Fighting", because it is designed to win by effect, not by ATK. It's not a "Robot", because it blatantly isn't. It's not related to "Egypt", because it was introduced in GX and had no connection to Egypt at all. And it isn't stylish. So, the topic title is pretty much solid stupidity. As is to be expected from SD.[/quote'] I believe that warrants two sips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aximil Posted July 5, 2009 Report Share Posted July 5, 2009 It worked pretty well in the Vanilla Exodia deck I made on WC08. Lesse. It's not "Super"' date=' because it sucks. It's not "Fighting", because it is designed to win by effect, not by ATK. It's not a "Robot", because it blatantly isn't. It's not related to "Egypt", because it was introduced in GX and had no connection to Egypt at all. And it isn't stylish. So, the topic title is pretty much solid stupidity. As is to be expected from SD.[/quote'] It is everything the title says. "Super" bad. "Fighting" because it CAN fight. And the "Robot" and "Egypt" aren't seperate so don't use them seperately. "Robot " means this is the closest Ancient Egyptians got to a "Robot". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.