Jump to content

i tryed and say it...


Recommended Posts

FINALLY A NORMAL MONSTER CARD ALL BY ITSELF!!!! lol. There's only one problem with the name and pic...a hydra is a multi-headed serpent/dragon where as the pic only shows a one-headed dragon; just an observation. I personally like it! The description could probably have a tad more, but it's still really catchy.

 

8/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[align=center]Where are all these 8/10s coming from?They just look at the post above and be like the rest

Its a vanilla >.<... Dont make Nilla's

As well as that:

A). The grammar is appauling Grammer Bad

B). The picture is fantasy art that you found on Google. (Lucky guess?)

C). Dragons fail unless made properly........ Yes they do

2/10[/align]

Yeah I give this card a 1/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

woow dood wtf wats ur prob

 

Aiku: Dude! Take the critic!

 

OCG: Nothing to say' date=' except that's a Vanilla and this card should have an effect on it.

Effect: Nothing.

Image and Name: The image is blah and the name is blah, average. In the exception of the skin color of the dragon, I don't see why this dragon should be called "Blood Dragon".

 

Overall: 1.6/10[/color']

Link to comment
Share on other sites

woow dood wtf wats ur prob

 

Aiku: Dude! Take the critic!

 

OCG: Nothing to say' date=' except that's a Vanilla and this card should have an effect on it.

Effect: Nothing.

Image and Name: The image is blah and the name is blah, average. In the exception of the skin color of the dragon, I don't see why this dragon should be called "Blood Dragon".

 

Overall: 1.6/10[/color']

 

 

its Dragoon there is a dif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...