Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 This deck is heavily based on Burnpsy's example, nigh exact, but I decided to try some Inferno Reckless Summon. Do not post if you are just going to bash ideas and/or give non-constructive advice. I can take critisism but I didn't post to be bashed or other people to flame. I personally feel I should take out a Cyber Valley and put something else in. Maybe side that and Slingen for 2 Stumblings so I can play morphs in face up def. Just a thought I had. Monsters: (19) 3 Cyber Valley3 Morphtronic Boarden3 Morphtronic Boomboxen3 Morphtronic Celfon3 Morphtronic Radion2 Morphtronic Remoten2 Morphtronic Scopen Spells: (16) 1 Brain Control1 Giant Trunade1 Heavy Storm3 Junk Box1 Limiter Removal2 Machine Dupication3 Morphtronic Accelerator2 Morphtronic Map2 One-for-one Traps: (5) 2 Threatening Roar3 Solemn Judgement Extra Deck: (15) 1 Armory Arm2 Black Rose Dragon1 Colossal Fighter2 Dark Strike Fighter2 Gaia Knight, The Force of Earth1 Goyo Guardian2 Magical Android1 Red Dragon Archfiend2 Stardust Dragon1 Thought Ruler Archfiend Side Deck: (14) 1 G.B. Hunter2 Light-Imprisoning Mirror2 Mirror of Oaths1 Morphtronic Forcefield1 Morphtronic Remoten3 Prohibition2 Shadow-Imprisoning Mirror2 Trap Eater Total: 40 cards Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 16, 2009 Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 So, you essentially just took the example, sided Overload and Future, removed Ancient Fairy Dragon, added Red Dragon Archfiend, and axed Prohibition from the side deck, then put 2 IRS into the main deck? A viable idea, but you don't seem to understand what side decks are for. Why side Future and Overload? In what situation would you swap it in? Forcefield ad Remoten were sided in the example so I could swap Remoten in against LIGHT, because I'd need to add LIM, negating Scopen. Forcefield was for abnormally high counts of things to negate, in which case it's necessary. Also, don't remove Valley. One person followed the example, removed Valley, and ended up with dead draws due to lack of sufficient drawpower. Removing them also makes the 3rd Dupe a dead draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2009 I mainly sided them just so I would have the option of adding them back in, I'm really just testing the IRS. And yeah, I figured that when the CV and MD came up more than I thought. But something still seems off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Ok, I'm not exactly as Burnpsy's example deck, but I never use Future Fusion and Overload Fusion... am I just not playing it right or do IRS seem like a logical thing to replace them? Also, I have a problem with getting more than one boarden out at a time, I never seem to have machine duplication when I have him in my hand. This could just be rotten luck so far, but any playing tips? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crow™ Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 One person followed the example' date=' removed Valley, and ended up with dead draws due to lack of sufficient drawpower. Removing them also makes the 3rd Dupe a dead draw.[/quote']Hm...I wonder who did that? -,- Anyway, Maybe try an Earthbound Immortal? It (was one of the few things that) worked in Morphos for me. Maybe try it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Ok, deck list is updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Smart. I would've run 1-4-1 if I had the space. But, why do you have 2 Brain Control? >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Oh, I forgot to take it out of the side deck. But besides that it looks good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 It LOOKS like an overall solid deck. You'll have to test to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 So' date=' [b']you essentially just took mine[/b], sided Overload and Future, removed Ancient Fairy Dragon, added Red Dragon Archfiend, and axed Prohibition from the side deck, then put 2 IRS into the main deck? *Cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 So' date=' [b']you essentially just took mine[/b], sided Overload and Future, removed Ancient Fairy Dragon, added Red Dragon Archfiend, and axed Prohibition from the side deck, then put 2 IRS into the main deck? *Cough* I meant took my example, as in the one I posted. He already knows the build is yours, it's clearly labelled where he found it. Do we really need to mention that every time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 So' date=' [b']you essentially just took mine[/b], sided Overload and Future, removed Ancient Fairy Dragon, added Red Dragon Archfiend, and axed Prohibition from the side deck, then put 2 IRS into the main deck? *Cough* I meant took my example, as in the one I posted. He already knows the build is yours, it's clearly labelled where he found it. Do we really need to mention that every time? yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 So' date=' [b']you essentially just took mine[/b], sided Overload and Future, removed Ancient Fairy Dragon, added Red Dragon Archfiend, and axed Prohibition from the side deck, then put 2 IRS into the main deck? *Cough* I meant took my example, as in the one I posted. He already knows the build is yours, it's clearly labelled where he found it. Do we really need to mention that every time? yes OK, if you say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Hmm, I'm fairly certain that's a violation of the rule I posted in the first post: "non-constructive" esspecially since essentially just spam. Oh, and you might want to READ the deck list before posting that because now it's actually different =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Hmm' date=' I'm fairly certain that's a violation of the rule I posted in the first post: "non-constructive" esspecially since essentially just spam. Oh, and you might want to READ the deck list before posting that because now it's actually different =/[/quote'] Mine isn't an exact copy of the one I was given either, but it's still based off of the same build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Anyways, I think I need more back row destruction. I don't really run into problems, but it happens enough that I'm worried about it. Any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 MST is one of the few splashable ones. Actually, I can only think of that and Dust Tornado, as Twister is sided at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted July 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 Made some slight changes, r/f Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.