.:pyramid:. Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 a tribute to the cancelation of reaper, you will be missed. spirit reaperdark3zombie/effectThis card cannot be destroyed by battle. Destroy this card when it is targeted by the effect of a Spell, Trap, or Effect Monster. If this card successfully attacks directly, your opponent randomly discards 1 card. where does this guy deserve to be on the ban list. remember use reasoning, something the cw didnt use when cancelling the show after 2 seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Comparing it to The Fool who is never really run:Added weaknessDARKDiscard effect You'll barely ever use the discard effect, DARK means it's Allurable and CCVable, I'm not sure if those two things should make him need a limit, even more so since he has that rather painful downside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted July 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 wait so all monsters that are crush-able and allurable need a limit. limit kuriboh now!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 Comparing it to The Fool who is never really run:Added weaknessDARKDiscard effect You'll barely ever use the discard effect' date=' DARK means it's Allurable and CCVable, I'm not sure if those two things should make him need a limit, even more so since he has that rather painful downside.[/quote'] Actually, that "weakness" makes him pretty cool. After all, many of the targeting effects that are run are position-changing effects, change control effects, and destruction effects. If he would ever be taken over to changed to attack position, that would be bad. Because of his effect, if he is targeted by one of these effects, he will destroy himself, which is usually more favorable than losing control of him or him being put into attack position.I think limiting is a good place on the list for SR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted July 28, 2009 Report Share Posted July 28, 2009 He is fine at 1 no decks really need more anmd hes not ruining the game to the point of banning him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Well he is still better than The Fool/Marshmallon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 3 is too much, because of the fact he can discard and if he isn't targetable, thenhe'll stick around. S/T backup is variable, so leaving him at 3 isn't smart.1 is fine, since he has some of the games most popular parameters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.