Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Hi I'm new and I would like to see if youguys think this card is realistic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
☆ Master Sami ☆ Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Name stinks you could find a better 1, balanced effect but instead of saying all that thing about damage to you opponent while the monster is in defence position you could just say this monster deals piercing damage, OCG could be better. Yes it's a realistic 1. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 ThankBut I don't understand what your telling to do with the effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shinwa Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 He is just telling you to reduce the text ^^ .... read OCG " This card deals pearcing damage. When this card attacks your opponent directly, you can destroy 1 Spell- or Trap-Card on the field " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Oh ok ^_^Is this better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cuckoos Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 He is just telling you to reduce the text ^^ .... read OCG " This card deals pearcing damage. When this card attacks your opponent directly' date=' you can destroy 1 Spell- or Trap-Card on the field "[/quote'] That fix is dead wrong. Don't correct people's OCG if you suck at it yourself. "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. When this card inflicts battle damage to your opponent, you can pay 500 Life Points to destroy 1 Spell or Trap card on the field." Also change the name, because card names with "Hell" in it in the OCG are changed in the TCG. And lower attack to about 1600 or 1700. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.GhostRyder Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Can you post the effect in a spoiler, my eyes wont squint that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthus Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 You should change it to 1800 ATK and like 1200 DEF because right now it's OP'ed. A cooler effect would be to make your opponent discard 1 card to the top deck when you direct attack. Just a suggestion scince it's a fire type, maybe DARK? But pretty damn good for a newbie. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloister Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Name STINK. OCG errors. Overall 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATG3192 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 The name isn't the best. With that pic I would've personally called it "Infernal Dark Knight" or something along those lines. Anyway, the OCG, yes, is pretty bad. It should be mostly how Cuckoos put it, but to keep it as close to how you had it I'll put down how it shoudl be: "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. If this card does Direct Damage to your opponent, you can destroy 1 Spell or Trap card on the field." That's how I believe it should be worded out at least. But hey, like a few others said, not bad for a first-timer! 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Ok I'm trying to get this perfect So I hope I get this one right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 It's best to update only the first post as senior members and higher tend to never read anything else... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Oh ok thanksI changed them allSo I'm guessing its good now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Kittens Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 I think it's pretty good. Not only for a newb but for anyone. I'm just curious as to what its name was before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 It was "Hell's Finest Knight" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gustavosuarez Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 very realistic card. maybe you can change the card name for a one better. the effect is basic but balance. good job for a new member. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 New cardI need to edit the picture but I'm on my phoneSo that all I have for nowEffect: "Blue-Eyes White Dragon" + "Red-Eyes B. Dragon"Increase this cards ATK and DEF by 200 for every Dragon-type monster in your graveyard. This card can attack twice. If your opponent has 1 or more monsters on the field this card's ATK is doubled and it can't be destroyed by the effects of Monster, Spell, or Trap cards. Discard 1 card from your hand to destroy all cards in your opponent's side of the field. Each time this card attacks a monster and it is sent to the graveyard, increase your Life Ponts equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster and inflict damage to your opponent's Life Points equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 effect is balanced out, though the name isn't too creative 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 ThanksI was thinking of:Purple-Eyes Dark Silver DragonorPurple-Eyes Gray Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 the first name sounds better to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Ok I changed it And thanks the help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 very well, the pic is also overused, but I'll still raise the rate to 9.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady_Deadpool Posted July 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 Well I'm still going to change the picture but my phone doent let mePlus I think that's the highes iv goten so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 29, 2009 Report Share Posted July 29, 2009 that's fine, you change the pic I'll raise it even more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.