Xing Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 O.....k..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypony Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Since you only know what speed you were going at,it's most likely that the other car was going over 50 MPH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted August 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Umm, no. They weren't going fast, I saw it. But hey, it was an SUV. With a BABY inside! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormented Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 So hang on.....Shouldn't this then mean that the dvla suck? all this time their complaining about cars being damaged badly at high Speeds and yet at 5 miles per hour, car could be litrally destroyed? how weird lol as for the crash itself, maybe one of the cars parts where a bit old or somthing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 The reason they both fell apart is because they're designed to crumble and absorb the force of the impact. While this is, for the most part, safer than cars without this feature, it means that cars are damaged much more easily, and as a result, more often. This causes yearly automotive repair costs to increase by an exceptional amount. Its bullsh*t that the auto industry is and has been this deep in the hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windowlicker Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 ^You're a genius :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 ^You're a genius :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacoby746 Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 What are the cars made of, tin foil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 What are the cars made of' date=' tin foil?[/quote'] 1/16 inch aluminum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorc: The Dark One Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Under 5 MPH?I lol'd.One of the cars was probably damaged to start with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Maybe they were rusty or ANCIENT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Maybe they were rusty or ANCIENT. Older cars would have barely been dented at 5 MPH. Cars from the 70s would barely be dented. But if you want to talk about durability, the 1949 Packard De Luxe could could run over a small tree without a scratch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas carpenter Posted August 11, 2009 Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 that is weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted August 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2009 Meh, my grandma's is an 06. I want my dad's car dead >.< it's a crappy, horrible looking, Honda from 1991. It's smelly, and is a piece of crap. It has trash everywhere, and stains.But they say it's economical, so we needa keep it. As to the ancient cars, the SUV looked kinda old. And Side mirrors are crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.