Rate Cards plzzz

[Magister18]

 

post what you think Plllzzzz!!!!!!!

[Captain Murphy ☆]

you used synchro wrong and the first i think i can see some OCG errors please write out the effect

[Deustodo]

Use Scynchro wrong and some OCG error, deserve a 4/10

[Guest Merciful Idiot]

To everyone who has currently posted on this Thread, put the below words to heart.

You know' date=' I've come to the conclusion that my pic will never be original enough. My OCG will never ever be perfect and my effects will always be "bland." I think I'm just gonna stop posting the cards and just make them for me, that way the pic is always good the ocg may be missing one word but who cares.

[/quote']

 

 

Good Point. People will always find one mistake and make a big deal out of it.Of course, what im wondering right now is why they are making a big deal out of it. Its not like it HAS to be perfect.

---

One question: Whats the point of posting cards if you already know that people are going to critisize you for making one OCG error or typo or horrible pic or bland effect? You already know you aren't gonna get good ratings because people are obessing over OCG these days. Dont ask why. However, if you do find a good pic for your card, people will complain its overused.

---

Technically, no matter what you do, people will ALWAYS find something wrong and make a big deal out of it.

 

I am not saying we shouldnt post cards. Im saying we should post cards because we think they are good and if they dont like it, soooo sorry. They cant change your opinion and they also have no control over you. So dont feel bad if someone downrates the heck out of you for "overused pic" or something other than that.

 

Um. False. If people are making a big deal out of it, your card probably isn't as spectacular as you believe. :/

I've seen plenty of card that people have rated favorably, even with a few OCG errors. Unless you consider people rating you 8/10 because of OCG "making a big deal". Really, you go into it with such a defeatist attitude, you're not going to make a good card.

 

Um. Probally 20% of people posting on your card probally dont even play the game when you do. You know what words/terms to use. You'll know if the OCG is wrong or not. And when I say "Big Deal" I mean they'll always say theres an OCG error and will always comment on it, also (insert comment here) 7.5/10.

Also, its common if some people think your card sucks and some others dont. I don't mind good ratings, It just gets annoying when people say "Minor OCG errors" or some other brief phrase like "bland effect" and then rate you 6/10 or lower. It doesnt even accomplish anything except your post count and thats about it.

 

I dont know about you, but OCG doesnt really even matter to me. I never ever post anything about OCG unless its answering a question or correcting someone.

 

Also, I do listen to people's opinions. And once I get to a "your card sucks" comment. I usually say "whats so bad about it? I want you to prove how my card is bad."

 

I dont understand. The only things that matter to me on a card is the pic, the effect, and sometimes the name, but OCG...no thanks. I'll let others discuss this further. I'll take a break from ranting for a while.

 

and this:

Effects are suffering.

Language is becoming prime.

Newbies are not being treated as newbies.

 

What is wrong with you people?

 

I've been discussing this whole thread idea (well' date=' an offshoot conversation about it) with Browarod, my friend and fellow Moderator. And he has come up with a legitimate and not very harsh rule suggestion. Which I'd like to run by all of you;

 

[b']"-Any member who posts only regarding "bad OCG" or only posts an OCG correction (even if it is accompanied by a rating) will be given a ??% Warning the first time, a ??% Warning the second time, and will receive a 3-day ban upon the third occurrence. Any further occurrences after the 3-day ban will result in consequences such as a ban from the Realistic Cards section, or even a forum ban."[/b]

 

Your feelings on it?

 

EDIT: Xander had the original version of this rule. Which I may or may not post later.

 

Anyway, not bad.

[Magister18]

the effect if you want to see it is here:

 

Fire Warrior + Ice Warrior

 

When card is placed face-up on the field it gains 200 ATK, it also has a speical ability after it attacks if it destroys a monster it gets to attack again and if there are no monsters on the field besides Grandmaster Koei your opponent takes a direct hit

 

and ty for your comments exspecially the last one i really like that and i will do my best to fix my errors on these cards ty

[jordan252]

you put the ice warrior as ligt and the fire one as ligt change the ice warrior to water

[Magister18]

you put the ice warrior as ligt and the fire one as ligt change the ice warrior to water

 

k ty i will change that

[jacobmunrokagan]

nice pictures and effect ill give you a 8/10

[Magister18]

nice pictures and effect ill give you a 8/10

 

ty