vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Alright folks, this one is not as over powered as the last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flaring Rose Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 jeez you know should limit its attack like it can only go up to 3200 atk or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagerow Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Well. It is perfect. There is a card that increase own ATK point each time they destroys a Monster. and it is 200ATK point. Even though. No one actually use it. It is very hard to destroy a monster and raise attack point. I can give you a 87/100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Thank you Kagerow. As for you Aragondom999, the card is not hard to destroy at all, so I did not see a point in limiting it's attack. It's vulnerable against trap and spell cards and also flip effects so it is pretty balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 still slightly bland of an effect, though it's balanced out 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 why dont you just say by 100^^.I might think that you multiply it by 100 , again^^. well..its balanced and the pic is ok 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Lol thank you and sorry about the confusion but that's how it's written on many of my Yu-Gi-Oh! cards so i just figured.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 yeah it is right, that way..But i always made the joke..^^ even on real cards xDIt looks that way, or am i wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Haha well I guess SOME people might get confused, but regulars definitely would not. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 What does that mean xD.Im not that dumb, its the course of intelligence..i found the mistake they made..and now theyre pretending, as if only idiots wouldnt know :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 OCG seems good, minor errors though. Pic is decent. Effect is weird. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Haha, thank you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPO Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 effect is good,picture and name is ok but 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coreander Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Artwork is okay.OCG is great.Effect is a little bland.It reminds me of "Doom Dozer" who is also Special Summoned by removing from play 2 Insect-Type monsters (in your case Warriors),but that's a good thing.The other part of effect is the bland one.Maybe if you put "increase this card's ATK by 100 for each Warrior in your Graveyard"? 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTF Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vadim26 Posted August 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2009 Thanks guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.