Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Comments are appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexsoxfan01 Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 it seems overpowered then underpowered i don't know why....it makes my head feel weird9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Hmm? Explain please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Well...it's effect seems terrible at first (you lose all your cards) but then it gets better (loss of the hand for your opponent.) Make up your mind! xD 7/10 nice art choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Your card contradicts itself.Its ability destroys all monsters on your side of the field when it is normal or special summoned. There cannot be two of those monsters on the field based on that effect alone.The grammar suffers.Sentence structure could be better.0/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Your card contradicts itself.Its ability destroys all monsters on your side of the field when it is normal or special summoned. There cannot be two of those monsters on the field based on that effect alone.The grammar suffers.Sentence structure could be better.0/10I get what you are saying about the 2 being on the Field. Reworded it a bit. But still 0/10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 I'm toughest on those who claim "Magician", "Sorcerer", "Mage", "Sage", etc in its name. The magicians are my babies. I have spent years honing my Magician deck, and continue to build off of that base deck. For any new magicians to come into creation, I judge harshly (yes there are real yu-gi-oh magicians that I will not even allow near my deck). The rewording helps significantly. That was the primary reason for the 0. I'll give it a 8/10. The effect seems too powerful for his level.His ATK/DEF seem too low for his effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Well, the reason I put 1550 ATK is so it couldn't be searched out by like Mother Grizzly. I might make it a Level 5, just to make it harder to get out for that effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Level 5 would improve it I agree.That's about all i can see that needs to be changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Ok, changed it to Level 5. And I upped the DEF a bit to make it more worthy of Level 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xbon Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 umm, its kinda underpowered, because of ATK/DEF/LVL ratio, effect is fine, would work better as a lvl 4. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 much better.10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 7/10 not really orignal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogg-Saron Posted November 20, 2007 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Any other comments? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balvarine Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 It is a good card now,when you re-edited it! Its ATK is a bit of prob.But then again,I understnd.But why is this card so wierd to use its effect.Your effect is based that it must be removed from the field,right?So why that effect to negate the attack of your opponent's monster,most would ask.It is because(I'm not speaking in your name) you have to get 1 more Ice black sorcerer to protect(with this card's effect which is to negate the Attack of your opponent's monster) it because when it is another I.B.S. on your side of the field,you can draw 1 card, I know.So why you do not increase its effect in a sense of doubling your Draw from 1 to 2 cards that you have to draw from your deck???8.99/10!I'm pleased with it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viera~Fran Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 It's a very good card, but a bit overpowered because if you had a hand full of Dark World monsters when it discards all cards if your hand you would get to summon monsters or draw cards (depending on the DW monsters you had.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 True. 7/10. Nyeh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.