Stallwings

[RyanAtlus]

The number of non-n00bs playing FC has just doubled :o

But...why?

BW's aren't Stalling material' date=' and by combining them, you rape both themes. But if it works, it'd be awesome.

[/quote']

 

I should test this to see...

 

Anyways, the main reason why I made this has been posted already:

 

[spoiler=The Conversation]

THIS IS IT:

 

MONSTERS (19)

EXODIA x5

Mystic Tomato x3

Shining Angel x2

D.D. Warrior Lady

UFO Turtle x3

Giant Rat x3

Black Stego

Chaos Necromancer

 

SPELLZ x8

Creature Swap x3

Card Destruction

Hand Destruction x2

Dark Factory of Mass Production

Reload

 

TRAPZ x14

Return Soul x2

Back Up Soldier

Reckless Greed x3

Sakuretsu Armor x2

Trap Hole x3

Gravity Bind

Jar of Greed x2

 

EXTRA DECK:

Mokey-Mokey King

 

AND IT STILL BEATS ALL TEH N00BZ!

 

Didn't I do something similar in concept?

You did? :o

 

Yeah' date=' except it ran loads of monsters.

[/quote']

This is just Anti-n00b and really annoying. :D

 

I can see that. xD

 

Seems just as fun, if not more fun, than my 30-Monster Exodia.

This was just Shamwow random pile off cards to piss people off kinda thing....obviously not serious! :) Exodia is WAY to boring for me to pick up....

 

Mine wasn't a serious deck either...

Besides, Stall/Exodia doens't have birds in it! D:=

 

It could...

Stallwings? <:.......:shock:.....:|........:?.....:(....:o.....:).........:D.....

Meh...not rly...:D

 

LOL, now Ima gonna try it.

o:

OK.....

 

I'm trying it BECAUSE it doesn't look like it'll work.

 

I'll post it after dinner.

Cool. Kinda odd becuase off the complete double opposite strategys going on but sure! :)

 

After a brief look, this will be a little difficult.

a little? D: :lol:

 

It can be done.

Yeah. It just one of those BW builds thats liek wierd and 'off'.

 

 

 

 

I know. But it doesn't feel very comfy to me to see them both in 1 Deck. It's like watching yugioh's first series anime; it feels allright, but you know there's something wrong about it.

[burnpsy]

I agree with you there... >.