Lexadin Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 I'm working an a card of my new set and whatever I do The effect doesn't sound right. Help plz. Redirect me if I posted it in the wrong section.P.S. you can rate also if you want.Lore: This card is treated as a "Nightwatch" monster. Each time this card destroyes a monster as result of battle, place 1 Guardlight counter on this card. When "City of lasting Night" is targeted by the effect of an card that would destroy it, you can remove 2 Guardlight counters from this card to negate that effect and destroy the card.Pic credit: sinslave, deviant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragoncreator12 Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 I think the OCG is Good I think I see 1 Small error:This card is treated as a "Nightwatch" monster. Each time this card destroys a monster as result of battle, place 1 Guardlight counter on this card. When "City of lasting Night" is targeted by a card effect that would destroy it, you can remove 2 Guardlight counters from this card to negate that effect and destroy the card.I hope this is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 dragoncreator12's correction is correct except you must also capitalize "Lasting" since it's in a card name. Where is this City of Lasting Night? I have to see that before I can call this good. 7/10 for now. =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragoncreator12 Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Yea! What he said. >_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengal Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 OCG fix again: This card is also treated as a "Nightwhatch" monster. When this card destroys a monster by battle, place 1 Guardlight Counter on it. You can remove 2 Guardlight Counters from this card to negate a card effect that targets a face-up "City of Lasting Night" you control and destroy it. Not bad, I kind of like the image and the card seems balanced. I guess it is good "City of Lasting Night" support. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Princess Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 This card is also treated as a "Nightwatch" monster.When this card destroys another monster by battle, place 1 Guardlight counter on this card(max. ?)Nearly all of the monsters which can use counters have a limit.(maybe even all of them) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted September 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 tnx for the help, you will see the City of the Lasting Night in my upcomming Nightwatch set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Princess Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 No problem. :) What's your limit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted September 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 It doesnt have it. No need for it to have one. If it would be 4 or something like that, you can nagete 2x so it really woould make much of a difference (at least in my oppinion). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonlight Princess Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Well, than it should be:This card is also treated as a "Nightwhatch" monster. When this card destroys another monster by battle, place 1 Guardlight Counter on it.(max. 4) You can remove 2 Guardlight Counters from this card to negate a card effect that targets a face-up "City of Lasting Night" you control and destroy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 I see no City of Lasting Light. Until I see it this only gets 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.