Master White Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Please Edit and see what you think. the effects are just examples. I just seeing if it could become a realistic card or not. I know it wouldn't, but seeing what you all think. Thinks. Easily enough to read in he card. Ex: 1Below is in the card"Mist cards are another sub type card. They are cards that are treated as normal monsters, but can be special summoned from the owners hand without any tributes. Ex, Myst of Destruction can only be special summoned by its own effect. So you just normal summon it, like a normal card. Generally a mist card can be any type, but it mainly has a strong atk/def and is generally low stars with a powerful drawback. See example 3." Ex: 2Ex: 3But yeah, please do not harsh it too bad, I thought a new sub type would be a good change for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Ursus Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 I really like the concept, but there are 3 things you should improve: The sub-type name is very good. 1: Restrict their ATK, DEF and effects a lot. They are extremely OP as they are now. 2: Improve the overall image quality or replace them all with entirely different ones. Try using the likes of Deviantart. Other than that, good for a new member. :) A. Edit: 3: Take a look at the OCG thread to improve your OCG, or try looking at real cards for correct spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 I really like the concept' date=' but there are 3 things you should improve: The sub-type name is very good. 1: Restrict their ATK, DEF and effects [b']a lot[/b]. They are extremely OP as they are now. 2: Improve the overall image quality or replace them all with entirely different ones. Try using the likes of Deviantart. Other than that, good for a new member. :) A. Edit: 3: Take a look at the OCG thread to improve your OCG, or try looking at real cards for correct spelling. 1. That is how they are meant. They are strong atk def cards with an oped drawback. I figured it was the best way for them to work. 2. The images are just random quick pics, not really meant fo the card itself. If I was going to get good pics, I probably get them off a good website, but I have to create a account with deviantart and I really don't want to do that. 3. thanks for the LIKING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angel of Silence Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 It has already been said. The idea is quite nice though. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Drawbacks on drawbacks, but they are overpowered anyway. And if it's a new subtype, post it in the Any Other Card section 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 why create the mist type, and anyways they're still Oped for the effects in TOO much drawbacks 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Too much? There are TOO less drawbacks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted September 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 Too much? There are TOO less drawbacks! at least you agree with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master White Posted September 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2009 why create the mist type' date=' and anyways they're still Oped for the effects in TOO much drawbacks 7/10[/quote'] Too Much Draw Back...I thought you would have said too little. -You have fooled the fooler once again-Once said by a wise guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.