Ookami Moriyama Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 [spoiler=[b]Credits[/b]]Warrior Girl of the Ruins: images.google.com [spoiler=[b]Warrior Girl of the Ruins[/b]][spoiler=Effect]Warrior Girl of the Ruins: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned, if you control no monsters on your field. While you control this face-up card on your field, you cannot Normal Summon or Set cards on your field. This card cannot be destroyed by battle and is unaffected by the effects of your opponent's Spell and Trap Cards. If your opponent controls 3 or more monsters on his/her field, this card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase. Battle Damage inflicted to your Life Points, involving this card is reduced to 0. This card inflicts Piercing Damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 that special summoning condition is a little too easy to get it out to the field I'd also remove the trample effect along with its ability to attack twice per turn (despite the conditions needed for it), it's getting too powerful 7.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 I like it. pic is ok. Effect is meh. OCG is good. ~7/10~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teramaster Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Ok, I won't hold back, so prepare.1. "If you control no monsters ON YOUR FIELD". The "on your field" is unnecessary, because the words "you control" say pretty much the same thing.2. "you cannot Normal Summon or Set cards on your field." Set any card or just monster? Also, again "on your field". It's unnecessary, because if you Summon or Set a monster, it's always gonna be on your side of the field, with 2 or 3 exceptions - and I believe you didn't think of Lava Golem when you were making this effect.3. "If your opponent controls 3 or more monsters on his/her field, this card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase." What happens if the opponent has exactly 3 monsters, and Lady kill sone of them? The opponent has 2 monsters, and Lady doesn't get her second attack.4. A few OCG mistakes, if you want me to point them out, say so. As for the positive sides, the effects are quite original, aside their unclear state. The art is fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted September 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 that special summoning condition is a little too easy to get it out to the field I'd also remove the trample effect along with its ability to attack twice per turn (despite the conditions needed for it)' date=' it's getting too powerful 7.8/10[/quote'] well, I guess you're right I'm a little off with the effect creation long time away from the site :(:(:( but I have to say that this card is just a prototype for somethin' else that even I don't know yet (I know it sounds stupid,but that's the truth) I'll figure it out 'bout this card Thanks for the comment ^_^ I like it. pic is ok. Effect is meh. OCG is good. ~7/10~ I was afraid of that :( I need a lot of work on this effect Thanks Ok' date=' I won't hold back, so prepare.1. "If you control no monsters ON YOUR FIELD". The "on your field" is unnecessary, because the words "you control" say pretty much the same thing.2. "you cannot Normal Summon or Set cards on your field." Set any card or just monster? Also, again "on your field". It's unnecessary, because if you Summon or Set a monster, it's always gonna be on your side of the field, with 2 or 3 exceptions - and I believe you didn't think of Lava Golem when you were making this effect.3. "If your opponent controls 3 or more monsters on his/her field, this card can attack twice during the same Battle Phase." What happens if the opponent has exactly 3 monsters, and Lady kill sone of them? The opponent has 2 monsters, and Lady doesn't get her second attack.4. A few OCG mistakes, if you want me to point them out, say so. As for the positive sides, the effects are quite original, aside their unclear state. The art is fantastic.[/quote'] I was prepared! he-heh all you said it's almost true see, that's the way I write my effects (check any of my threads) and 'bout this card.... I'm just recovering after an unwanted break and Thank you for your support and comment I appreciate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 oh don't worry about it, I doubt my judgment has evolved TOO much from when your last cards are, it's just you need to readjust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted September 22, 2009 Report Share Posted September 22, 2009 Awesome card, but a bit OP'd. Art is awesome. 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted September 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2009 oh don't worry about it' date=' I doubt my judgment has evolved TOO much from when your last cards are, it's just you need to readjust[/quote'] well, I'll try my best like always :D there are just too many effects and I don't know how to put them in order:( I hope I'll figure that out too..... Awesome card' date=' but a bit OP'd. Art is awesome. 9/10[/quote'] Thank you I'm still workin' on it :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted September 23, 2009 Report Share Posted September 23, 2009 I like the pic. OCG is fine. I'd say a little too OP though.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted September 23, 2009 Report Share Posted September 23, 2009 I dont see any major errors, except you can change "his/her" to "their", its sort of new OCG but either way. Pic goes with the name and the effect is fairly balanced IMO. overall, 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted September 23, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2009 I like the pic. OCG is fine. I'd say a little too OP though.8/10 Thank you I dont see any major errors' date=' except you can change "his/her" to "their", its sort of new OCG but either way. Pic goes with the name and the effect is fairly balanced IMO. overall, 8.5/10[/quote'] Thank you ^_^ but I still need some work.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted November 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 26, 2009 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgent111 Posted January 8, 2010 Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 what the hell is Piercing damage? all yu-gi-oh cards just inflict damage, and whats with the on your field (at least make your side of the field) i understand you've had a break but how long XD a few centuries? lol im being too mean so... i liked the picture ( i didnt really XD) and its got a nice Name? lol i fail at being positive XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgent111 Posted January 8, 2010 Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 what the hell is Piercing damage? all yu-gi-oh cards just inflict damage, and whats with the on your field (at least make your side of the field) i understand you've had a break but how long XD a few centuries? lol im being too mean so... i liked the picture ( i didnt really XD) and its got a nice Name? lol i fail at being positive XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgent111 Posted January 8, 2010 Report Share Posted January 8, 2010 what the hell is Piercing damage? all yu-gi-oh cards just inflict damage, and whats with the on your field (at least make your side of the field) i understand you've had a break but how long XD a few centuries? lol im being too mean so... i liked the picture ( i didnt really XD) and its got a nice Name? lol i fail at being positive XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2010 what the hell is Piercing damage? all yu-gi-oh cards just inflict damage' date=' and whats with the on your field (at least make your side of the field) i understand you've had a break but how long XD a few centuries? lol im being too mean so... i liked the picture ( i didnt really XD) and its got a nice Name? lol i fail at being positive XD[/quote'] piercing damage it is when the card inflict damage to your opponent even if your opponent's monster is in DEF Position "your side of the field" = old OCG "your field" = well, you get it..... thx anyways for comment ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 and to think nothing has happened since the last time I rated your cards here...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 14, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 and to think nothing has happened since the last time I rated your cards here...... :( I'm sorry man :( I wanna finish few of my projects and then continue this I was thinking about this I know what what project it will be :D so it evolved since you last rated :)):)):)) (jk) Thank you ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ookami Moriyama Posted January 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 16, 2010 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.