~Oleon~ Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Hey it's me again!Yeah, before this card is shown, I would like to give picture credits to Fantasy Ace on Deviantart.Some of you have seen my Goldcross Dragon card, explained by others as epic, 10/10. Now I present my newest card...ROBOT OF THE YEAR 4000! [/img] Well there you go...Special thanks to fantasy ace for making me laugh pretty hard at the angry face.It was clever. Thanks for looking, watch, read, view, comment and rate!Thanks guys, you rock!...Bump..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexis Rhodes Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 not as good as your last card but still good cannot see what the picture is showing but 7/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Oleon~ Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Thanks YuGiOh 5D's, I know it's not as good as Goldcross, I just need some inspiration. And maybe some imagination. And then I'll make my CREATION... AAAAAAAAHHHHHHH! Rhymes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Not bad pic, few OCG errors, ATK is pretty hard to calculate, maybe actually a bit UP? Really nice in a burn deck though :).6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Oleon~ Posted September 29, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 I am ashamed of this card. I have gone back to bad bad ways that I don't like. The less than 8/10 ways...NO!!!I'm sorry, I can't bear to look at this.Can a mod lock this thread please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 definately a late game card, 1st effect is a bit too powerful without a drawback though 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.