Vailan Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 REMOVED EVERYTHING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Breakaway Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 Whow Kick ass card i see a little OCG error here and there but 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexis Rhodes Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 some very good pictures and effects in there 8/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ornithopter Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 Wow, great cards, great pics, great support for the vanillas!No OCG errors, i think.9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 [spoiler=OCG Fixes and Suggestions]I think "Stone Golem"'s ATK is slightly too high for a Lv.5. Thunder Droid As long as you control 2 or more different face-up "The Supreme Union" monsters, this card can attack your opponent directly. Lightning Knight This card can only be Normal Summoned or Set while you control 2 or more "The Supreme Union" monsters. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, all Normal "The Supreme Union" monsters you control gain 400 ATK and DEF, during your opponent's Battle Phase only. Lava Serpents This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by removing 2 "The Supreme Union" Monsters in your Graveyard from play. As long as this card remains face-up on your side of the field, your opponent loses 500 Life Points during each of their Main Phases for every other face-up "The Supreme Union" Monster you control. Other cards: ' = " : he/she = they : his/her = their Also, see above corrections. Pretty good, but I can't help thinking they might be better if you shortened it to just, "Supreme Union", loosing the 'The'. Anyway: 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 max darkness already pointed out the OCG errors, and this time I'll let the vanillas go due to the large amount of spells/trap support 9.4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vailan Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 @Max Darkness:Thanks for the OCG corrections, but the 'new' text is almost the same as what I wrote, but in different words. And that 'he/she' does not have to be 'their' (there are enough real cards with 'his/her' or 'he/she' in the OCG). Perhaps it's old OCG, but I still use it, because it sounds way better. Stone Golem...5 stars, 2500 ATK. I guess that's OK, because he has 0 DEF. And cards like Labyrinth Wall or Millennium Shield...5 stars and 3000 DEF ;). If I want to remove the 'The', it means that I have to change 25 cards...and that is a bit too much :O. @Ragnarok:Large amount? 5 Spells/Traps :P, but some of the effect monsters are also support ;).Thanks :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Some OCG errors. 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vailan Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 And the rest? :P Thanks ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Awesome cards! Best pics I've seen in a while. Nice Vanillas with great support. :) OCG errors pointed out above. But still, great cards! 9.5/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShootingTheMoon Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 4/10 Too Many Vanillas, I hate the pics (Too Realistic) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vailan Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 @Sweetlightning:Thanks for the rating ;) @Glass:What's wrong with the amount of Vanillas? :|. It's perfecly balanced: 10 Vanillas, 10 Effect Monsters. And all my sets contain Vanillas! Realistic? You've got to explain that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meatsheild41 Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 I really like archtypes, you have to use them to support eachother, and like that you don't have to mix monster types in your deck. This is an awesome set, and probly one of my favorites (I'm glad they're not heroes, they're overused). I was actually expecting union monsters (don't see them much anymore), but it's cool. Pics are great and stats effects are all balanced out and stuff. Plus, vanillas are always good to make, I'm not a hater like some people (not pointing any fingers *pointing*). 9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 I've got nothing against vanillas but they serve no purpose here. I would recommend making some support for Normal Monsters in your set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vailan Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 @Meatsheild41:I deliberately used every Monster-Type in this set ;). Well, it's not a weird thing that you were expecting Unions, because the thread's title says 'The Supreme Union'. But that is the surprise ;), no union monsters, but a union of monsters :P. Glad that you are not a hater. @Lord Smeagle:I already made support for them. Some effect monsters support the vanillas, and the Spells and Traps too (they support all monsters, including vanillas) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Nice card's, I see some minor OCG errors but that's ok.You've made a lot of Vanilla's but the pic's are good and the lore's are also, but you should consider making some more support for the (They hardly have any), maybe some Fusions of them?A 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vailan Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 A fusion is possible, but it has to be a Psychic-Type...hm, I'll see what I can do ;). Thanks ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
--------------- Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 awesome srry but i cant say whats already been said :D 9.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.