NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 [align=center]Here why don't I think for you. This is good. effect When this card is Normal Summoned you can stack all monsters from your opponents Graveyard under this card. If this card would be destroyed destroy one of the staked cards instead.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 I'm not so much against fake types, just against fake stupid types. Sure, so they added Psychic, which makes the "fake types" things you're trying more plausible, but nothing like "Shiningami"... =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 do you know what shinigami means Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Shinigami means Death God in Japanese and there are many different types of them, but how does it have to with this card? Also only one card can occupy a card zone, you want to explain stacking a little more before thinking people will understand what you mean. By looking at the card, warrior seems like to be the best option for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Yes, and I think it should rather be an Archetype instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 stacking is a very unique idea, and the pic is awesome, but man, I've never though of an effect like that.... a bit op'd, tohugh. 8.8/10, cause it's a fake-type. I like fake-types.Besides, some fake-types can fall into the already-made categories, but others can't, like human, or vampire, or ninja. No, ninjas aren't warriors. No, Vampires aren't zombies. No, not all humans are spellcasters or warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Since this is L in shinigami form I think the type suits this a little. Oh and staking is simply breaking the rule you just stated oh and anything goes with a card effect since there is a rule in the official rule book that if a cards effect tells you to break the rule then follow what it says on the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 stacking is a very unique idea' date=' and the pic is awesome, but man, I've never though of an effect like that.... a bit op'd, tohugh. 8.8/10, cause it's a fake-type. I like fake-types.[hr']Besides, some fake-types can fall into the already-made categories, but others can't, like human, or vampire, or ninja. No, ninjas aren't warriors. No, Vampires aren't zombies. No, not all humans are spellcasters or warrior. Ninjas are warriors -_-' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninja Mercenary are hired warriors making ninjas warriors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Since this is L in shinigami form I think the type suits this a little. Oh and staking is simply breaking the rule you just stated oh and anything goes with a card effect since there is a rule in the official rule book that if a cards effect tells you to break the rule then follow what it says on the card. Then why is this in Realistic? =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 no, that's a common misconception... ninjas are stealthy and used for assasination. Warriors are meant for balttle and have nothing to do with ninjas. They barely use the same weapons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Ninjas are simply servants without masters and warriors live by a code of honor ninjas have no honor and the real name for ninja is ronin no mono which rufly translates to servent without a master. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Ninjas are simply servants without masters and warriors live by a code of honor ninjas have no honor and the real name for ninja is ronin no mono which rufly translates to servent without a master. They are mercenaries hired by warlords for bodyguards position, assassinations or other difficult missions. And where do you get the idea ninja don't have a code of honor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 In this game of Yu-Gi-Oh, Ninjas are Warriors, Scientists are Spellcastors, and Tornados are Winged Beasts =/ And your cards closely resembles what this game calls Warrior. There is no need for a Shinigami type, if anything an Archetype. And if it's because of L, why is this in Realistic section? Your card makes no sense =/ I do like the stacking part, although it could be worded better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Ninja are samurai who have disgraced them selfs ninja are samurai with no honer do you know nothing about history or do you watch to many films and anime.Oh and I put it in reolistic to pic out the picky people and why do you ask such a question when that was not part of the subject. P.S. You asked why make a new type instead of useing an old one then answer me this why not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Ninja are samurai who have disgraced them selfs ninja are samurai with no honer do you know nothing about history or do you watch to many films and anime. I know my history and no ninja are not samurai who have disgraced themselves. First show me where you got this information then I will believe you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 stacking EVERY one of your opponent's monsters in the graveyard under it might get a little too powerful 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 lol from history books not a site that looks to media for info.stacking EVERY one of your opponent's monsters in the graveyard under it might get a little too powerful 7/10 Thank you for noticing I thought that the lvl would account for it's effect but if you think it's op any suggestions.Oh and X31 try looking up the history of samurai and ronin no mono. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 P.S. You asked why make a new type instead of useing an old one then answer me this why not. Firstly, lrn2grammar >.> Second, to answer your question of "Why not?", because this is the Realistic section... =/ And that is just, plainly, simply, obviously not realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 This + Mausoleum = PWNAGE...You'd need to maindeck/side-deck bounce cards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Looky, a Ninja^^ Effect is....weird but creative. 7.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 This + Mausoleum = PWNAGE...You'd need to maindeck/side-deck bounce cards... that was good I rarely miss a strategy but some how I missed that one. OH and anyone wants me to change it's type It's a shinigami in other words an undead so we will have a vote anyone who is stuck up and thinks I should change it say so and all that appreciate a little creativity then you say so. The type will be changed to Zombie since in yugioh Zombie stands for Undead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 How do fake types show creativity, you just change a little word? You have a better chance of making a custom attribute, it shows more creativity. Also I looked up the history of samurai and ninja, they are completely different the only thing they really have in common is that they are from Japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 First line that was a stupid comment.Second line you have a point.Last two dude I know my history and you'r completely wrong Ninja is a word samurai came up with just like the military came up with the belt system for martial arts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted October 11, 2009 Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 First line that was a stupid comment.How? All you do is change one little word. If you want to be creative' date=' come up with a new function in yugioh.[/b']Second line you have a point.Last two dude I know my history and you'r completely wrong Ninja is a word samurai came up with just like the military came up with the belt system for martial arts.Show me how I am wrong with proof as I have enough info to back myself up on what I am talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeriesUmbra Posted October 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 11, 2009 Okay brief history lesson on where the word Ninja came from. Nin-sha meaning concealed men were mercenaries for a Chinese emperor and these nin-sha tryed to get Samurai to join them And since Samurai are Japanese they mispronounced in kanji lettering/symbols as ninja. This has its roots in many writings that predate the 14th century texts that you seem to be going by. and shinobi only came about as a word used to describe them in the 16th century so the terms are now interchangeable but the ninja you speak of are just a new misconception of a true ancient men known in the older Chinese texts and doctrine written. The newer writings would have you believe that the ninja were soldier / assassins for the Japanese. while partially true this is a common misconception in part by historians not getting their facts right and basing their information on messed up pseudo facts created in later times by people who decided to dramatize the way of the warrior and turn the arts of ninjutsu in to a tv series or movie for profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.