Bull3tM0nk3y Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 [align=center] "Water Dragon" + "Water Dragon"This card can only be Fusion Summoned by Sacrificing the above Fusion Material Monsters (you do not use "Polymerization"). This card inflicts Piercing damage. If this card was destroyed by Battle, you Special Summon 2 cards with "Water Dragon" in their name, from your hand, Deck or Graveyard. Rate, fix.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 You expect someone to "Tribute" 2 Water Dragons, who have 2800 ATK, and make all FIRE and Pyros useless, for a 2700 ATK monster that does Piercing, no Fire killing, and summons 2 "Water Dragons" that were on the field already?0/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 You expect someone to "Tribute" 2 Water Dragons' date=' who have 2800 ATK, and make all FIRE and Pyros useless, for a 2700 ATK monster that does Piercing, no Fire killing, and summons 2 "Water Dragons" that were on the field already?[/quote'] This. But there are OCG errors as well. Sacrificing = Releasing This card can only be Fusion Summoned by Sacrificing the above Fusion Material Monsters (you do not use "Polymerization"). = This card can only be Special Summoned from your Fusion Deck by Releasing the above cards on your side of the field. (You do not use "Polymerization"). That's all I can get at the moment. 4.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eury Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Sacrificing = Tributing/Releasing (it doesn't matter which) For the last effect you forgot to add 'Ignoring the Summoning Conditions' and it's far too UP'd right now. Make it stronger. 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Namo™ Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 Has anyone noticed that this card doesnt say "Ignoring the summoning conditions"?This card pretty much screws itself over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 Sacrificing = Tributing/Releasing (it doesn't matter which) For the last effect you forgot to add 'Ignoring the Summoning Conditions' and it's far too UP'd right now. Make it stronger. 4/10 so don't like it sorrylike what the others say^^4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~LunaticTouhou~ Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 It has mistakes. It would be better if you made the ATK 4200 and the DEF 4000. Also instead of special summoning 2 cards with Water Dragon in the name anywhere, do "You can special summon 1 Water Dragon from your graveyard." Also another effect should be "If this card attacks or is attacked by a FIRE attuributed monster, it is destroyed immetiatly (No battle damage is done.) 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 uhm after water dragon has been special summoned correctly AND successfully (if a card like solemn judgment, black/horn of heaven is activated then it's not counted as being summoned succesfully) and it is sent to the grave you can special summon it with a card like call of the haunted as the summoning conditions have already been met.so it's effect would only work on ones that are in the grave that have already been summonedand this card is definitely not worth itit's definitely better than water dragon but is definitely not worth summoning 2 water dragons for italso it's atk is too low id make it ATK/3800 DEF/3600 so it's atleast 1000 points stronger than the fusion material monstersapart from all this the effect is just plain boringall it does inflict piercing damage and special summon fusion material monsters when destroyed 6/10 just because the picture is really good and it looks just like a fusion of water dragons would look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 No. Just...no. No one would ever run this card, period. The odds of actually getting two Water Dragons on the field are slim to none anyway, so why would you sacrifice them for a weaker monster? This thing needs to be crazy powerful. 1/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmc1234 Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 wow, its like tributing 3 Blue eyes ultimate dragons to summon a kuriboh. this cards is the definition of up'd and bad try using the ocg thread here in ycm,. 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 the original water dragon is 10 times better than this, I'm sticking with that 1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.