賢狼ホロ Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Chrono Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 It needs a drawback, otherwise it's too powerful, and the enter isn't needed. and clarify "ATK or DEF" in the last line for me. The pic is too real.7.5/10 pretty good for a beginner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Chief13 Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 nice but way too OPed. maybe if you pay ??? lifepoints or somethingi give a 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destron Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 OCG fix: This card cannot be destroyed or negated on the turn it is activated. At each player's End Phase destroy all monsters on the field except the monster with the highest ATK and the highest DEF. . . . or something like that. anyway, it's OP'd and there are obviously some minor OCG errors. and its a little bland. i recommend giving it a drawback, fixing it's OCG and give it another effect. 7/10 for the time being Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 Don't press ENTER/RETURN after a sentence. The card's flavor texts are not written as paragraphs or lists. That, and the space between the sentences looks kind of..."tacky." The "can't be negated" and "can't be destroyed" effects are also "tacky." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted October 14, 2009 Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 it's an OPed effect without a drawback to it, pic is unrealistic also 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
賢狼ホロ Posted October 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 14, 2009 "[...]clarify "ATK or DEF" in the last line for me.[...]"Sure, I will. Player 1- Monster A (1500 ATK, 1000 DEF)- Monster B (1200 ATK, 700 DEF)Player 2 - Monster C (1500 ATK, 1200 DEF)- Monster D (700 ATK, 1500 DEF) In this situation, I had in mind that only monster B would be destroyed, as it is the only card without either ATK or DEF value that is 1500. If monster B on the other hand had 1700 ATK or DEF, all other would be destroyed. Because this is probably quite complicated, what say you about changing it to the combined value of ATK + DEF? In the example above, only monster C would be left on the field. The general opinion seems to be that it is overpowered. I thought that the fact that the card can be turned from advantage to disadvantage by e.g. "Lightning Vortex". If the player originally using the effect of Natural Selection cannot bring out a monster on par with his opponent he will be at the same disadvantage his opponent was before. Now, I have only had like ten duels in my life so I hardly know much, but it clearly seems to be overpowered from your statements. What about "reversing" the effect? Changing "only the strongest survives" to "only the weakest dies"?Again weakest in the meaning of the sum of ATK + DEF? I shall also try to find a new picture. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
賢狼ホロ Posted October 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2009 Well, I might as well post the updates made so far. Balancing and OCG help, please? By the way, I've been thinking; continuous spell card or field card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spenstar Posted October 15, 2009 Report Share Posted October 15, 2009 Continuous, the effect isn't major enough for it to be a field spell. It's more of continuous spell material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
賢狼ホロ Posted October 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 I see, well then, I have changed that. Is the OCG and balancing all right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YamiMario Posted October 16, 2009 Report Share Posted October 16, 2009 Field Spell is best, IMO.Also, good effect and such.The OCG is fine, though you don't need to write "the lowest sum", just write "the lowest". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
賢狼ホロ Posted November 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 I just remembered, I updated this card for a couple weeks ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Natural Selection-A bit OP.8.5/10 Like the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
賢狼ホロ Posted November 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 What would you suggest to make it balanced, instead of overpowered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.