Because my thread was prematurely locked...

[Dark]

 

I have learned from this' date=' Dark. And I've been doing that. You'd be proud. But now members are angered that I warn them, so they're never happy are they?

 

Every time you or OMGAKITTY gets banned you make a thread about the same damn subject. It gets really old after a while.

[/quote']

 

Sorry there is no dateline. Check my "Not this again..." to show you I am not lying.

 

No, I don't think you have learned. It's great to see you are warning people instead of outright banning them, but are you sure you are warning them for the right reasons? Them saying "kitty princess is annoying" once or twice does not constitute for a warn at all, and I can tell by some complaints that this is a parallel of what you've been doing. You cannot go around warning people for stupid and invalid reasons. If you warn someone 50% for creating 3 troll threads in a row, that would be valid, and any complaints should be disregarded.

 

But the warnings you are giving out are not like that, and you are pretty much abusing your moderating powers. You give out a 70% warning for a single troll thread, and then ban the person x amount of time for arguing with you. Is this what a Mod is supposed to do?

 

And since I read your signature, and I don't want this to get locked, others can discuss about threads in the past two weeks while Prince Hunter answers my two paragraphs of statements.

 

Personally, I'm just replying to my clubs I'm active in before I go thread searching. And later I'll investigate why the Official Relationships Thread was locked.

[Slash]

Wait, your ban expired, I thought you were perma'd

Damnit <_<

[Huntar!]

Hold up, i banned no one today, except for OMGAKITTY because his warning was too high.

 

Dark, please cool it with these threads. I'm asking you nicely.

[Brushfire]

I love this thread.

 

I'd just like to throw in there, that me calling kitty a suck-up and telling the truth got me a 70% warning.