OMGAKITTY Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Oh Fire Haze' date=' I didn't want to have to do this. :I Real Vampires = Oldschool vampires. As Icy said before, if anything there are Vampire [i']tendencies[/i]. A vampire is and always will be an urban myth. There are no such things as the vampire that you speak of. It's the same as lycanthropy, having it doesn't make you a werewolf. =/ KNOW YOUR PLACE' I'll settle for your beleif, because we all know that vampires haven't ever been scientifically proven, nor do we even have evidence on it [like we do for the Chupacabra]. But either way, I'll defend my case on vampires, no matter. Because they exist in my book. They exist in Stephenie Meyer's book too. And Bram Stoker's. And Ann Rice's. And... GTFO~ All the fictions about vampires in THOSE books are clearly ridiculous. Dammit, you're so annoying it hurts, and I'm so stubborn that I argue with you anyway. >_< As I said before, Stephenie Meyer's books are based on REAL vampires that she MET. I should know, I was there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Oh Fire Haze' date=' I didn't want to have to do this. :I Real Vampires = Oldschool vampires. As Icy said before, if anything there are Vampire [i']tendencies[/i]. A vampire is and always will be an urban myth. There are no such things as the vampire that you speak of. It's the same as lycanthropy, having it doesn't make you a werewolf. =/ KNOW YOUR PLACE' I'll settle for your beleif, because we all know that vampires haven't ever been scientifically proven, nor do we even have evidence on it [like we do for the Chupacabra]. But either way, I'll defend my case on vampires, no matter. Because they exist in my book. They exist in Stephenie Meyer's book too. And Bram Stoker's. And Ann Rice's. And... GTFO~ All the fictions about vampires in THOSE books are clearly ridiculous. Dammit, you're so annoying it hurts, and I'm so stubborn that I argue with you anyway. >_< As I said before, Stephenie Meyer's books are based on REAL vampires that she MET. I should know, I was there. I could say so much right now, but how I was raised will stop me from saying those words in any form or manner. Oh, were you there? I'm so sorry for misunderstanding your logic on vampires. What else did Stephanie Meyer tell you? That she based Jacob off of a real werewolf too? [/sarcasim] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Oh Fire Haze' date=' I didn't want to have to do this. :I Real Vampires = Oldschool vampires. As Icy said before, if anything there are Vampire [i']tendencies[/i]. A vampire is and always will be an urban myth. There are no such things as the vampire that you speak of. It's the same as lycanthropy, having it doesn't make you a werewolf. =/ KNOW YOUR PLACE' I'll settle for your beleif, because we all know that vampires haven't ever been scientifically proven, nor do we even have evidence on it [like we do for the Chupacabra]. But either way, I'll defend my case on vampires, no matter. Because they exist in my book. They exist in Stephenie Meyer's book too. And Bram Stoker's. And Ann Rice's. And... GTFO~ All the fictions about vampires in THOSE books are clearly ridiculous. Dammit, you're so annoying it hurts, and I'm so stubborn that I argue with you anyway. >_< As I said before, Stephenie Meyer's books are based on REAL vampires that she MET. I should know, I was there. I could say so much right now, but how I was raised will stop me from saying those words in any form or manner. Oh, were you there? I'm so sorry for misunderstanding your logic on vampires. What else did Stephanie Meyer tell you? That she based Jacob off of a real werewolf too? [/sarcasim] Stupid. Werewolves don't exist. Everyone knows that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fenrir Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Oh Fire Haze' date=' I didn't want to have to do this. :I Real Vampires = Oldschool vampires. As Icy said before, if anything there are Vampire [i']tendencies[/i]. A vampire is and always will be an urban myth. There are no such things as the vampire that you speak of. It's the same as lycanthropy, having it doesn't make you a werewolf. =/ KNOW YOUR PLACE' I'll settle for your beleif, because we all know that vampires haven't ever been scientifically proven, nor do we even have evidence on it [like we do for the Chupacabra]. But either way, I'll defend my case on vampires, no matter. Because they exist in my book. They exist in Stephenie Meyer's book too. And Bram Stoker's. And Ann Rice's. And... GTFO~ All the fictions about vampires in THOSE books are clearly ridiculous. Dammit, you're so annoying it hurts, and I'm so stubborn that I argue with you anyway. >_< As I said before, Stephenie Meyer's books are based on REAL vampires that she MET. I should know, I was there. OH U <3 Chupacabra is more believable than a Vampire, but I won't go into mai conspiracy theory mode for that. Stupid. Werewolves don't exist. Everyone knows that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Mkay, well, vampires exist. At least to me. How I know? Because I know two vampires. What else do I know? The OMGAKITTY frustrates me, but that's okay~ Why is it okay? Cause I'm gonna end the argument here with my statement and his. Since we both are just clashing with eachother's beleifs, no point in keeping this going. ^_^;; Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Mkay' date=' well, vampires exist. At least to me. [b']How I know? Because I know two vampires. [/b] What else do I know? The OMGAKITTY frustrates me, but that's okay~ Why is it okay? Cause I'm gonna end the argument here with my statement and his. Since we both are just clashing with eachother's beleifs, no point in keeping this going. ^_^;; i honestly would like to know more about this. it seems unreal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinzo Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 I think that back then they didn't know what rabies were and rabies got mixed with vlad the impaler and then many coincidences later vampires became the legend it is now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Mkay' date=' well, vampires exist. At least to me. [b']How I know? Because I know two vampires. [/b] What else do I know? The OMGAKITTY frustrates me, but that's okay~ Why is it okay? Cause I'm gonna end the argument here with my statement and his. Since we both are just clashing with eachother's beleifs, no point in keeping this going. ^_^;; i honestly would like to know more about this. it seems unreal PM me, then, with questions on what you'd like to know, and I'd answer gladly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yasu Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Vampires are fictional mythological creatures.The Wikipedia (that anyone can edit) has spoken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted October 29, 2009 Report Share Posted October 29, 2009 Haemovoria is a real condition. It's a MENTAL one, not a physical one. And since when did Twilight become the Bible? We should run. Robert Pattison is coming for our souls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brushfire Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Vampyric Tendencies may exist. But Vampires? No... This. None of you can understand a vampire until you ARE one or you MEET one. PM me for info. I have met and befriended two vampires before. If you don't beleive me' date=' then fine. I really don't care what you beleive or not. As long as I know what's right, I'm fine. And for those who SAY you're a vampire, seriously, you have no idea.[/quote'] I don't believe you at all. You said it yourself, they aren't Scientifically proven and they would be if a common child had befriended one. Sorry, but it seems highly unrealistic. :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dweller of Parables Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 I don't understand this topic.Too much delusion and fantasy all compressed into one mass.This mass is quite similar to another compiled misfortune called Fail. Topic: Vampires don't like pumpkin.How would I know? I know a family of vampires who don't like them.They don't have fangs either.Blood for sex is what they offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlucardTheOld Posted October 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 vampires are real i know a few. the do NOT have fangs. but can digest blood and 8 times the lethal limit of iron(normal humans cant do either) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted October 30, 2009 Report Share Posted October 30, 2009 Disabilities And Abnormalities =/= A Vampire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imma Mario Posted November 1, 2009 Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 People are uing this as a thread to get posts. EG. Myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Poison Posted November 1, 2009 Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 Vampires DO exist, according to this guy:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Henrie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitty Posted November 1, 2009 Report Share Posted November 1, 2009 Vampyric Tendencies may exist. But Vampires? No... This. Agreed. I, of which have Vampyric Tendencies, since I can digest blood, I am not particularly fond of the sun, and my senses are somewhat stronger than most around me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juuzou Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 Vampyric Tendencies may exist. But Vampires? No... This. Agreed. I' date=' of which have Vampyric Tendencies, since I can digest blood, I am not particularly fond of the sun, and my senses are somewhat stronger than most around me.[/quote'] Lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 All the vampires moved to Gensokyo. Obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 All the vampires moved to Gensokyo. Obviously. Then none of us can see them unless we move to Gensokyo D: [/sarcasm] Vampyric Tendencies may exist. But Vampires? No... This. Agreed. I' date=' of which have Vampyric Tendencies, since I can digest blood, I am not particularly fond of the sun, and my senses are somewhat stronger than most around me.[/quote'] You aren't a vampire >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Phoenix Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 Vampyric Tendencies may exist. But Vampires? No... This. Agreed. I' date=' of which have Vampyric Tendencies, since I can digest blood, I am not particularly fond of the sun, and my senses are somewhat stronger than most around me.[/quote'] I bit my lip and swallowed some of the blood. I'm totally a vampire. [/sarc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blamonchesix Posted November 2, 2009 Report Share Posted November 2, 2009 Who wants Dinuguan? XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.