Kotaro Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 OCG might need looking at I havent made many cards lately and might have lost my skills. During your Main Phase 1, you can remove from play 1 Level 5 or higher monster from your Graveyard to increase this card's ATK by 500 until the end of your opponents next Battle Phase. Each time this card battles with an opponents monster while this card's ATK is higher than 2000, your opponent loses 300 Life Points for each card removed from play. During your Main Phase 2, by Tributing 1 Level 4 or higher Pyro-Type monster you control, you can Special Summon 1 Pyro-Type monster that has been removed from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcadiz Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 I like it.9/10 Found 1 mistake: Each time this card battles with an opponents -->montser<-- while this card's ATK is higher than 2000, your opponent loses 300 Life Points for each card removed from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Oh yes, damn typo's, fixing that now and thanks for rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 OCG seems fine. Balanced effect with temporary ATK gain and burn. 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Nothing wrong here.10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Thanks for both of your comments and ratings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 I would like a few more comments, and if there is something wrong with it, I would like it to be pointed out. Anyways, bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recteik Shade Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 Luv it 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 Thankyou for your ratings. Anyone else care to comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 This seems ok, the pic isn't that good.Overall, a 8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAEGING D0GKING Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 awesome card 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Oleon~ Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 Not much wrong here, 9.9/10 just to tease you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 This seems ok' date=' the pic isn't that good.Overall, a 8.8/10[/quote']Why not? But thanks for rating. awesome card 9/10Thanks Not much wrong here' date=' 9.9/10 just to tease you.[/quote']So close to 10, and thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Impact Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 good to see u again anyway sme contraversial wordin that people argue over for hours so i wont go therebut opponents=opponent's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 Yes, that is one error, thanks for pointing it out Auxiliary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexadin Posted November 6, 2009 Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 This seems ok' date=' the pic isn't that good.Overall, a 8.8/10[/quote']Why not? But thanks for rating. I don't really like the style in which it was made, so it's something personal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2009 This seems ok' date=' the pic isn't that good.Overall, a 8.8/10[/quote']Why not? But thanks for rating. I don't really like the style in which it was made, so it's something personal.Ok, if its personal then I accept your opinion. That reminds me, credit to the picture goes to Magic Deck vortex website. I didnt make it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2009 Anymore comments, 1 more final bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
II ScOpEz II Posted November 7, 2009 Report Share Posted November 7, 2009 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 it is good to see you again Kotaro the effect looks quite balanced out with the burn and atk boost 9.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kotaro Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 @Scopez: Thanks for rating but would like a bit more input to your thought. @ragnorok:Thanks for rating and comment. Its good to have you back as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.