Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Here's a card I made. I think it's a little underpowered, but I'd like to hear your feedback! :) All Image Credit Goes to Wanderley I hope you like it. Effect: During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. Once per turn, you can discard up to 2 Spell Cards from your hand to your Graveyard. This card gains 300 ATK for each card discarded by this effect, until the End Phase. Each time a Spell Card is activated, place 1 Dark Spell Counter on this card. (max. 2) During your Main Phase, you can remove 2 Dark Spell Counters from this card to return 1 Spell and Trap Card on the field to their respective owner's hands. (Not sure about the OCG.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesgent111 Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 OCG a bit off, pic better then average 6.5/10, effect doesn't make sence why the peircing damage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 How does the effect not make sense? Thanks for your rate, btw. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinyBlade Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 ocg a bit but it awesome 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 this card is good thoughtthe last effect makes it a bit OP good try thought^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 It's not "Piercing Damage" people call it that but the real way to state it is "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". But after that, there's not much OCG problems. However, it is OP not UP. It's like a Giant Trunade (Which is limited in the YGO game) except with a cost. And believe me, that cost is extremely easy to reach. 7.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 It's a tad OP. Reduce the attack increase to just 3 or 400. 600 will leave it with 3500 ATK even for 1 turn, and this card easily be achieved by just discarding 2 Spell cards? Thats vastly OP for a level 7 when it can also inflict piercing. And with that last effect (which I think should be changed a tad to something else since Spell Counters are way to easy to get for an effect like that) It pretty much has a big chance of replenishing your Spell Card in hand ratio which then fuels its 3rd effect. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 It's not "Piercing Damage" people call it that but the real way to state it is "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card' date=' inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". But after that, there's not much OCG problems. However, it is OP not UP. It's like a Giant Trunade (Which is limited in the YGO game) except with a cost. And believe me, that cost is extremely easy to reach. 7.9/10[/quote'] your wrong hisOCG is right look at newer cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 It's not "Piercing Damage" people call it that but the real way to state it is "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card' date=' inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". But after that, there's not much OCG problems. However, it is OP not UP. It's like a Giant Trunade (Which is limited in the YGO game) except with a cost. And believe me, that cost is extremely easy to reach. 7.9/10[/quote'] Aye. I thought I should use "Piercing Damage" because I thought that was the new OCG. XD Oops. I didn't know "Giant Trunade" was Limited. Hmm. Perhaps if I made it so that returns only ONE Spell or Trap back to the hand? @Lovely Lady: Advice taken. I'll change the ATK boost to 300. And think of a new type of Counter for this card. Thanks for your rates. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 It's not "Piercing Damage" people call it that but the real way to state it is "During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card' date=' inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent.". But after that, there's not much OCG problems. However, it is OP not UP. It's like a Giant Trunade (Which is limited in the YGO game) except with a cost. And believe me, that cost is extremely easy to reach. 7.9/10[/quote'] your wrong hisOCG is right look at newer cards Examples? EDIT: Ummm sorry Wanderley but I think you're wrong about that. Take a look at all these examples: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Ally_of_Justice_Thunder_Armor http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Blackwing_-_Bora_the_Spear http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Blackwing_Armed_Wing http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Drill_Synchron They're all fairly new, piercing effect monsters. I could've listed more. If you want to see a complete list then just check out this: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Piercing This card is the only card that has the word "Piercing" in it: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Cyberdark_Horn @sweetlightning Apparently, you were wrong. And yes, those changes should be fine :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderley Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 *card edited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 ^^ Boosted to 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Thank you. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted November 4, 2009 Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 Yes' date=' I know. I have seen that card. Check my above post. I posted it as the only card that states it that way. You do know it is the only card that states that right? Plus, it isn't a new card. It's duelist pack [b']4[/b] we're on like 7 or 8 I think. I'm to busy to check. I've posted much more links to much newer cards in my above post. Though, let's not fight. Let's just be friends :( OT: sweetlightning, I see that you've made it balanced, however you should really change the piercing thing. 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2009 If it's just on one card, I suppose I should change it. Thanks for your improved rate. :) Card edit* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Yes' date=' I know. I have seen that card. Check my above post. I posted it as the only card that states it that way. You do know it is the only card that states that right? Plus, it isn't a new card. It's duelist pack [b']4[/b] we're on like 7 or 8 I think. I'm to busy to check. I've posted much more links to much newer cards in my above post. Though, let's not fight. Let's just be friends :( OT: sweetlightning, I see that you've made it balanced, however you should really change the piercing thing. 8.3/10 There are other cards that put Piercing Damage in it :3 look them up by looking up the deck that uses dark horn monsters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Yes' date=' I know. I have seen that card. Check my above post. I posted it as the only card that states it that way. You do know it is the only card that states that right? Plus, it isn't a new card. It's duelist pack [b']4[/b] we're on like 7 or 8 I think. I'm to busy to check. I've posted much more links to much newer cards in my above post. Though, let's not fight. Let's just be friends :( OT: sweetlightning, I see that you've made it balanced, however you should really change the piercing thing. 8.3/10 There are other cards that put Piercing Damage in it :3 look them up by looking up the deck that uses dark horn monsters I searched up the other "Cyberdark" monsters and none of them had "piercing". Even if they did, the vast majority of monsters do not put "piercing" in their effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Oh well maybe thats just in the hand writen description ^^ lol i was looking at yugioh wiki but their none for shortening the effects. But if one card says it then its normally ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozen Judgment Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Hmmm well I guess it's ok... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Łövëły-Ċħän♥ Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 I mean i doubt if Kanami were to view these cards they would not object to the Pierce Damage statement being in the card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 I'll just leave the piercing effect how it is. It seems to be the more common OCG. @Lovely Lady : Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallieBigs Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 jamesagent you don't take 3.5 off a rating for a bit off OCG this is good 10/10 awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Thanks for that rate! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Lightning Posted November 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Bump for last opinions/rates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.