Zaloog91 Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Pretty awsome cards 9/10. My only issue is the Enchantress because with 1500 you could ram her into an opponent's monster to use her effect and not lose alot of lifepoints while being able to do alot of damage to your opponent. Maybe lower her or atk or change her effect so it's monsters with an atk of 2000 or less instead of original. My only suggestion good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Gourmet Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Cool.A solid 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Pretty awsome cards 9/10. My only issue is the Enchantress because with 1500 you could ram her into an opponent's monster to use her effect and not lose alot of lifepoints while being able to do alot of damage to your opponent. Maybe lower her or atk or change her effect so it's monsters with an atk of 2000 or less instead of original. My only suggestion good job. Ok. Thanks for that...I struggled with her effect for a while. Ty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 I like the cards. Are you going to make a rival set with an attribute like FIRE? Well...if I get enough positive feed-back I might. ^^ *WINK WINK*And I'm glad you like them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Cool.A solid 9/10. Thanks! ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 At first I thought that Neptune's effect referred to the other monster, not himself. I'm pretty sure that's the way it would be grammatically too. I'd suggest clarifying his effect from "it" to something like "Destroy Deep Sea Beast Neptune". It might sound a bit weird, but it would cut down on confusion. Now, for whether or not he's balanced... I'd say he's a bit too balanced. Card advantage means everything in today's metagame. I don't see a one-time monster being particularly useful, especially when, considering it's purpose, a Sakuretsu Armor or other monster removal card would work more reliably. Neptune only has 1 advantage they don't have, he acts as a barrier to protect your LP. But Sakuretsu Armor stops the attack, there's still no LP damage. I feel similarly about cards like Goblin Attack Force. I'd suggest making a slight increase. Maybe 2500 or 2550? Just too put it over the edge, make it effective against a slightly larger portion of monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 At first I thought that Neptune's effect referred to the other monster' date=' not himself. I'm pretty sure that's the way it would be grammatically too. I'd suggest clarifying his effect from "it" to something like "Destroy Deep Sea Beast Neptune". It might sound a bit weird, but it would cut down on confusion. Now, for whether or not he's balanced... I'd say he's a bit too balanced. Card advantage means everything in today's metagame. I don't see a one-time monster being particularly useful, especially when, considering it's purpose, a Sakuretsu Armor or other monster removal card would work more reliably. Neptune only has 1 advantage they don't have, he acts as a barrier to protect your LP. But Sakuretsu Armor stops the attack, there's still no LP damage. I feel similarly about cards like Goblin Attack Force. I'd suggest making a slight increase. Maybe 2500 or 2550? Just too put it over the edge, make it effective against a slightly larger portion of monsters.[/quote'] Wow. Thanks for posting the longest comment on this thread! I designed him to take out Monarchs as stated above, (hence the 2450) but since he dies after 1 attack I guess 2500 would be fine. Also, thank you for clarifying Neptune's effect. I'll change it to "this card." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 No problem. And I would like to see a Fire Attribute set. You make good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Thanks. :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 New cards and pictures uploaded! I didn't like Enchanter's picture or effect-so he hit the junk pile-in place for my new Tamer! YAY! And I changed the picture for Enchantress, too. Then I added the next in line to the throne, the Deep Sea Prince. Well, I hope you like! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Hmm, I like the new Unskilled Tamer, but the Prince bothers me. 200 ATK multiples can add up real fast. Maybe, decrease it to a 100 increase and increase its base ATK? Or make it a 2-tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Hmm...ok. I just whipped him up a little fast. Maybe take out taht effect completely for a new one? Thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 6, 2007 Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Yeah, that might be a good idea. It's pretty hard to balance effects like that, and, well, if you can come up with a new effect idea, why not? Otherwise, the set's really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 6, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2007 Thanks. Sorry I screwed up. >. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex95678 Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Definetly continue. I don't see anything wrong with them. Better than perfect 20/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Definetly continue. I don't see anything wrong with them. Better than perfect 20/10. Wow! Being nice today! Lots of good ratings. Thanks and I'll keep 'em coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex95678 Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 your welcome you really do deserve that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Thanks. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malik37 Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 I like the cards. Are you going to make a rival set with an attribute like FIRE? Well...if I get enough positive feed-back I might. ^^ *WINK WINK*And I'm glad you like them. No problem, you deserved it. You showed great creativity (in my opinion) and some great support for the WATER attribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiba Aisu Posted December 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Thanks very much! I really appreciate all the support-it helps keep me motivated! :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted December 7, 2007 Report Share Posted December 7, 2007 Great Job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.