Läufer Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 [align=center]~Lore~This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by Tributing 1 "Lava Golem" your opponent control. When this card is successfully Summoned, you can pay 1000 Life Points to switch the control of this card to your opponent. As long as this card remains face-up Attack Position on your opponent's side of field, inflict 500 points of direct damage to your opponent's Life Points on each of his/her Standby Phase. When this card is destroyed by battle with a WATER monster and is sent to the Graveyard, the controller of this card can pay 2000 Life Points to Special Summon 1 "Lava Golem" from the Graveyard to his/her opponent's side of field.[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoryKing Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 I can't see the picture, but the card seems pretty balancedthe only OCG in it that i can see is: ..."your opponent control."it should be controlsim sure you saw it before this and are kicking your selfthe ocg rating is a 10but i cant see the card:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Läufer Posted November 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Sorry, I messed up the 1st time.How about now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoryKing Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 Yep, i can see it, and i like the picturetho it seems like Lava Golem looks more powerful than him...thats just me tho9/10 for the card overall now that i can see the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Läufer Posted November 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 My card has more abilities than lava golem.That's why I kinda copy Lava Golem's effects, then I add some more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squirtli Posted November 8, 2009 Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 It is a bit complicated, but I like it okay. Shouldn't "on each of his/her Standby Phase" be "on each of his/her Standby Phases"?Overall, I give it 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Läufer Posted November 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2009 It is a bit complicated' date=' but I like it okay. Shouldn't "on each of his/her Standby Phase" be "on each of his/her Standby Phases"?Overall, I give it 8.5/10[/quote'] I don't think so."Each" can be singular, too. Anyway, thanks for the rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 the burn is even less than the original, not sure how well this will turn out 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Läufer Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Thanks for the rate. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.