ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Please rate and comment. A better name for the card would be much appreciated.If this card is destroyed by battle, equip this card to the monster that destroyed it as an Equip Spell card. A monster equipped with this card cannot attack or change its battle position. If this card is destroyed by a card effect, destroy 1 card you control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 this should be a union type then since it's equipped to other monsters, though it's a very balanced effect, nicely done for a zombie 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 iron chain snake does somethign liek this and hes not a union Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fawkey Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 this should be a union type then since it's equipped to other monsters' date=' though it's a very balanced effect, nicely done for a zombie 8/10[/quote'] A union card? No way! This card's effect is similar to the Archfiend of Gilfer and unions are completely different.So the effect should be more like this:"If this card is destroyed by battle, equip this card to the monster that destroyed it as an Equip Spell card. A monster equipped with this card cannot attack or change its battle position. If this card is destroyed by a card effect, destroy 1 card you control." A good card! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 thx i'll change it right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 I don't think many people would make the effort of destroying this guy by battle. that's just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 I don't think many people would make the effort of destroying this guy by battle. that's just my opinion. true but w/e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 I don't think many people would make the effort of destroying this guy by battle. that's just my opinion. true but w/eNever w/e. If you wanted to make a monster great no matter your opponent's cards and even your cards, you would've made a Level 8-9 boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 I don't think many people would make the effort of destroying this guy by battle. that's just my opinion. true but w/eNever w/e. If you wanted to make a monster great no matter your opponent's cards and even your cards' date=' you would've made a Level 8-9 boss.[/quote'] i'm sorry if i sound like an idiot but i don't understand what u mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 You see, cards are good because of the strategy you use them in. But this card relies on your opponent's deck, not on your own. If you wanted it to be destroyed by battle, you would put it 1500 ATK or less and maybe some defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ЯчυКδ ңґεηđдϊ Posted November 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 You see' date=' cards are good because of the strategy you use them in. But this card relies on your opponent's deck, not on your own. If you wanted it to be destroyed by battle, you would put it 1500 ATK or less and maybe some defense.[/quote'] oh ok i see where you are comign form but i like it the way it is, thx for the opinion anywaysbump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 Nice pic.Have it on one of my cards.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fawkey Posted November 9, 2009 Report Share Posted November 9, 2009 You see' date=' cards are good because of the strategy you use them in. But this card relies on your opponent's deck, not on your own. If you wanted it to be destroyed by battle, you would put it 1500 ATK or less and maybe some defense.[/quote'] If you would have paid attention to the effect, you wouldn't have said that. See this card is supposed to be used to lock a powerful monster. You can summon it and immediately attack the monster. With 1900 atk you take little damage and stop the other monster from attacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.