bott52 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 I didnt do the coloring to well but please rate!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Ahhh...10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVaron Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 Im sorry what? I think my mind just got blown. Thats really cool. effect seems decent... 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebeast52 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 I love this trap synchro they r so cool!! 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightmare drake Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 good card9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death's Seduction Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberlightmagician Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 10/10, The game needs more variations like this. From Maruka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltoli Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 What's a trap synchro? If I knew that I would rate the card. Personally, I don't like it that much. I don't like trap monsters or synchros. You are entitled to your opinion, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 8.6/10Interesting.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 i'm sorry but this is just a horrible ideaplus the execution is just way offyou cant synchro summon cards that dont have levelsalso since when did trap cards have ATK/DEF stats?4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 first time I've seen a trap synchro before change may to can, and you forgot to say it's still treated as a trap in your effect 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrimalFear Posted November 14, 2009 Report Share Posted November 14, 2009 This is a really nice card my friend, I have yet to see a Trap Synchro until now. Their is only one thing I'd like to point out as stated above, the Trap has now stars so how can it be synchro Summoned. I guess you have to post some rules for this or you must put in your text something like, "This cards level is treated as 4" or something like that. Other then this I believe this card is really cool idea, 8.5/10 for creativity good luck my friend and remember what I said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVaron Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Wait just realized...Its just a metal reflect slime or zoma the spirit like monster that is considered a synchro...so yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 8/10 ....The trap monster idea has been done before but not like this...o____o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hollowmaster999 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Not realistic. OCG for last sentence: Once per turn you can Tribute a monster you control to negate the effect of a Spell or Trap card and destroy it. I don't really like the idea of "Trap Synchros" It might as well be a normal synchro. Also, no "Trap tuner" was provided. 7.01/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milk-Chan Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 This card is a combination of Trap and Synchro, so I can't tell what to rate.Seriously, wtf on Trap Syncrho's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.