kumapaws376 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
destron Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 OP'd with no notable drawbacks. It's basically just two in one with so-so OCG. Also . . ."Once per turn, this card cannot be destroyed by battle." . . . doesn't make sense. It currently means it can't be destroyed by battle. What you may have meant was:"Once per turn when this card is destroyed as a result of battle, it is not."So yeah. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blamonchesix Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 OP. Remove some effects please.7/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 It could be Gemini, but WYH. A leetle oped.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightmare drake Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 ok card6.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metal Skull Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 It's OK.6.8/10A bit OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Красивая Ведьма Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You put "Gemini" in a card title, but didn't make it a gemini monster? Also, the picture has a white border which shouldn't be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Smeagle Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Needs a drawback, like say, actually being a Gemini? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I'd remove the 1st effect of it attacking twice And even then, it's bordering the OPed end so you should add a drawback for it 6.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.