Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I hope you guys like these, I haven't done a Fake-type set in a while, I'm betting you people will say make these guys Warriors or Spellcasters, but honestly, they're humans. Summoning holograms of cards is not a spell and they aren't really warriors, so what else would they be? Anyway, if you've seen the series, you should understand the effects. I'll add people from classic Yu-Gi-Oh! hopefully soon and MAYBE 5d's (don't hope too much). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You HAD to use fake types... I just can't see the NORMAL PEOPLE as dueling monsters blowing up other dueling monsters. I'm just not feeling it. 2.9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 You HAD to use fake types... I just can't see the NORMAL PEOPLE as dueling monsters blowing up other dueling monsters. I'm just not feeling it. I agree. No multiple Types. At least the Type has support so that'll save the "No Fake Type" Part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Support or not, I spit on fake types like I spit on old girlfriends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I support Fake Types, just that I don't use them often. But Multiple Types are bad. Nope, there isn't even an Alliance to Support them. LOL @ that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 alright, got rid of multiple types cuz jolta had valid criticism. and good ol' JAZIN KAY, if fake types suck so bad, then tell me, WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM THEN? I GOT A VALID POINT THAT THEY'RE NOT WARRIORS OR SPELLCASTERS, SO WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM?? AND IF UR ONLY GIVING ME A 2.9 CUZ OF FAKE TYPES, THEN GTFO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dranzer Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Ignore them.If they have no better reson then to comment fake tipes screw them.Like the idea 7/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Ignore them.If they have no better reson then to comment fake tipes screw them.Like the idea 7/10. thnx, i feel better now, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazin Kay Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 alright' date=' got rid of multiple types cuz jolta had valid criticism. and good ol' JAZIN KAY, if fake types suck so bad, then tell me, WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM THEN? I GOT A VALID POINT THAT THEY'RE NOT WARRIORS OR SPELLCASTERS, SO WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM?? AND IF UR ONLY GIVING ME A 2.9 CUZ OF FAKE TYPES, THEN GTFO[/quote']THEY BAD CUZ ONLY STUPID KIDS WHO GOTTA MAKE UP STUFF TO PUT ON THEYRE CARDS USE THEM WHEN THEY CANT USE ALREADY-EXISTING TYPES FOR ACCURACY BUT THE KIDS DONT CARE ABOUT MAKING GOOD CARDS BECAUSE THEYRE NOOBS NOW GTFO. IF THE MONSTER A GOOD CARD MAKER LIKE ME HAS NO TYPE THAT FITS INTO WHAT IS ALREADY IN THE TCG THAN I EITHER PICK SOMETHING ANYWAWAY OR DITCH THE IDEA ALTOGETHER. WHICH IS WHAT I WOULD DO IN THIS PARTICULAR SCENARIO, GOOD SIR. Lol, caps lock. Now hush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 alright' date=' got rid of multiple types cuz jolta had valid criticism. and good ol' JAZIN KAY, if fake types suck so bad, then tell me, WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM THEN? I GOT A VALID POINT THAT THEY'RE NOT WARRIORS OR SPELLCASTERS, SO WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM?? AND IF UR ONLY GIVING ME A 2.9 CUZ OF FAKE TYPES, THEN GTFO[/quote']THEY BAD CUZ ONLY STUPID KIDS WHO GOTTA MAKE UP STUFF TO PUT ON THEYRE CARDS USE THEM WHEN THEY CANT USE ALREADY-EXISTING TYPES FOR ACCURACY BUT THE KIDS DONT CARE ABOUT MAKING GOOD CARDS BECAUSE THEYRE NOOBS NOW GTFO. IF THE MONSTER A GOOD CARD MAKER LIKE ME HAS NO TYPE THAT FITS INTO WHAT IS ALREADY IN THE TCG THAN I EITHER PICK SOMETHING ANYWAWAY OR DITCH THE IDEA ALTOGETHER. WHICH IS WHAT I WOULD DO IN THIS PARTICULAR SCENARIO, GOOD SIR. Lol, caps lock. Now hush. I knew it, u cudnt think of a good reason, to ditch the idea altogether is stupid just cuz u cant make one little thing like actual cards, and do good monster cards REALLY depend on type? no, its on the effect, level, atk and def, and like jolta said, i gave them support so whats the problem here? not everyone has to do things ur way, i usually do regular types for my cards, i just didnt do it here. people use fake types all the time, and u knw wat, I RESPECT THEIR CHOICE. i dont slander them for doing things a different way, something u wil never be familiar with because ur an arrogant buttmunch who likes to criticize others for not being perfect. if u did it in a nicer way, u wudnt be that bad of a person because ur criticism wud be constructive. but no, ur just a jerk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSusanoo Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I like the idea but why do they all have 1000 ATK(Except Nightshroud)i give it a 7/10And Jazin, if you hate fake types, why do you come here in this thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 I like the idea but why do they all have 1000 ATK(Except Nightshroud)i give it a 7/10And Jazin' date=' if you hate fake types, why do you come here in this thread?[/quote'] meh. representing a normal human's strength? somethin along those lines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSkullCortez Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 alright' date=' got rid of multiple types cuz jolta had valid criticism. and good ol' JAZIN KAY, if fake types suck so bad, then tell me, WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM THEN? I GOT A VALID POINT THAT THEY'RE NOT WARRIORS OR SPELLCASTERS, SO WHAT SHOULD I MAKE THEM?? AND IF UR ONLY GIVING ME A 2.9 CUZ OF FAKE TYPES, THEN GTFO[/quote']THEY BAD CUZ ONLY STUPID KIDS WHO GOTTA MAKE UP STUFF TO PUT ON THEYRE CARDS USE THEM WHEN THEY CANT USE ALREADY-EXISTING TYPES FOR ACCURACY BUT THE KIDS DONT CARE ABOUT MAKING GOOD CARDS BECAUSE THEYRE NOOBS NOW GTFO. IF THE MONSTER A GOOD CARD MAKER LIKE ME HAS NO TYPE THAT FITS INTO WHAT IS ALREADY IN THE TCG THAN I EITHER PICK SOMETHING ANYWAWAY OR DITCH THE IDEA ALTOGETHER. WHICH IS WHAT I WOULD DO IN THIS PARTICULAR SCENARIO, GOOD SIR. Lol, caps lock. Now hush. I knew it, u cudnt think of a good reason, to ditch the idea altogether is stupid just cuz u cant make one little thing like actual cards, and do good monster cards REALLY depend on type? no, its on the effect, level, atk and def, and like jolta said, i gave them support so whats the problem here? not everyone has to do things ur way, i usually do regular types for my cards, i just didnt do it here. people use fake types all the time, and u knw wat, I RESPECT THEIR CHOICE. i dont slander them for doing things a different way, something u wil never be familiar with because ur an arrogant buttmunch who likes to criticize others for not being perfect. if u did it in a nicer way, u wudnt be that bad of a person because ur criticism wud be constructive. but no, ur just a jerk. Fusion wins. Jazin, two words to you:Bite MeNow that thats over, I can't see many errors in the cards. Nice!9.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealthumbreon Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Minor OCG errors. Otherwise, the cards rule. 8.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbatonStrikes Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Some hardcore capital letter comments going on here lol!! I think fake-types are ok in the Pop Culture Section as they are based on things we like as individuals like FF, Naruto, Bleach, Kingdom Hearts, Transformers, DMC etc and it isnt the Realistic Card Section after all. I do like these cards effect, but why not make em so they fit with the Decks they use like Syrus roids, Aster D-Heros and so on. you could also add a "good" Zane too. 8/10 nice pics too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolta Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Some hardcore capital letter comments going on here lol!! I think fake-types are ok in the Pop Culture Section as they are based on things we like as individuals like FF' date=' Naruto, Bleach, Kingdom Hearts, Transformers, DMC etc and it isnt the Realistic Card Section after all. I do like these cards effect, but why not make em so they fit with the Decks they use like Syrus roids, Aster D-Heros and so on. you could also add a "good" Zane too. 8/10 nice pics too[/quote'] Hey, I was about to tell him to fit them into the Archtypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbbatonStrikes Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Sorry mate just a bit quicker on the draw...well type that is lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blablafodfpå Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DL Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Hmm... I've seen this before (I made duelist people) but these are really extensive. Maybe try to get pics without classroom backgrounds and such, and full body or most-body shots, cause headshots take away from the card. Effects seem nice, but could support their deck type, as stated. som eoCG errors, but nothing too major.Also, u used fake-types. congratulations.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardRul3r Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 The effect of the cards are really awesome! also the idea of fake types isn't that bad because i used some (don't see why people dont like it, imagination can take you anywhere). the pictures aren't so bad either. So overall ill give you a 8.5. :P Congrats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckandhoward Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 i never saw "Jazin Kay" say a positive comment. Well..I guess he has no life.nice cards anyway, it is unique. -7/10- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grassfoot Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 U forgot yubele!!!!!! You list it as a fusion monster and then forget it!!!!!!!!!Good tho they r underpowered tho.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 U forgot yubele!!!!!! You list it as a fusion monster and then forget it!!!!!!!!!Good tho they r underpowered tho.7/10 yubel is an actual duel monsters card, believe it or not, so i cant post it on here or make it different since it alredy exists :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dranzer Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 When will you add DM and 5D's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Neo Fusion Posted November 20, 2009 Report Share Posted November 20, 2009 When will you add DM and 5D's. i duno wat DM is, (if u mean like the original series, I'll work on it when I have free time, not much of that lately) and for 5ds, i duno, im watching it now, but i havnt watched much of it so i dnt knw if i shud do 5ds, but u never know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.