arkel Posted November 15, 2009 Report Share Posted November 15, 2009 Monsters -19-3x Fortune Lady Dark2x Chaos Sorcerer1x Tragoedia 3x Thunder King Rai-Oh3x Fortune Lady Light2x Fortune Lady Water2x Kycoo the Ghost Destroyer1x Fortune Lady Fire1x Fortune Lady Wind Spells -16-3x Fortune’s Future3x Future Visions2x Terraforming2x Gold Sarcophagus2x Allure of Darkness1x Different Dimension Gate1x Magical Dimension1x Brain Control1x Heavy Storm1x Giant Trunade Traps -5-3x Compulsory Evacuation Device1x Torrential Tribute1x Call of the Haunted Total: 40 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 May you explain me rai.mei in this deck...I'm a little tired to thin how you use it?And Second DDR or RftDD would be nice here...XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 ^Light and Cyber Valley amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Cyber Valleys negged due to awful, incorrect ruling. Rai-Mei searches Lighty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 No LV? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 No LV? ...Lightning Vortex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted November 16, 2009 Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 Its similar to mine :)I like it but I'm not sure about Rai-Mei and Sangan (dont really see any targets for Sangan unless he can some how search ? atk monsters) 2 Terra seems like overkill due to all drawing you should be doing.And unless I'm missing some wonderful combo (which I'm sure I am) 1-4-1 does not seems to be much help unless searching Light, which will not be removed from play due to Future Visions effect because it was special summoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2009 -1 Sangan-1 Rai-Mei-1 One for One +2 Allure+1 Kycoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiyan Knight Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Why did we take away Cyber Valley again...? Not one of your lists makes a whole lot of sense to me. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Majishan Posted November 17, 2009 Report Share Posted November 17, 2009 Why did we take away Cyber Valley again...? Not one of your lists makes a whole lot of sense to me. =/ He planned on using valley to abuse Light's effect, but sadly she missed the timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Why did we take away Cyber Valley again...? According to a Konami ruling, Lighty misses the timing when she's removed with Valley, even though Valley's text cleary states that Lighty gets removed at the same time at which you draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Excuse my french, but l don't know sh*t about FL. l won't be of much help, sorry.Maybe... Necrofæc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Maybe... Necrofæc? It's an interesting idea, but I don't think it'd work too well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Why not? As from what i've read, FL love being removed and have good support/effects when removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Why not? As from what i've read' date=' FL love being removed and have good support/effects when removed.[/quote'] Returning them back to the Deck wouldn't be the best of ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Right... Even still, he'd be a good finisher, and is good with allure. Maybe you could side it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Right... Even still' date=' he'd be a good finisher, and is good with allure. Maybe you could side it.[/quote'] He gains 100 ATK for each card he puts back. Not exactly what I'd call a finisher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Ok, it's not good here... Physically. But wit allure... I'm sure you could at least fit 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arkel Posted November 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Ok' date=' it's not good here... Physically. But wit allure... I'm sure you could at least fit 1?[/quote'] So now you're saying all decks that run Allure should run Necroface? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 No >.<I'm saying that allure and face would be great with FL. Think about it, don't you want them to be removed? Amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiyan Knight Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 820, you're terrible at this game. Just stop. I mean, you don't even know the decktype you're offering "help" with. Necroface isn't any good in Fortune Ladies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 Oh? Is that right now? Are you itching for a flame? A neg? A report? I won't give into your immaturity. Begone, rodent. ANYWAY, ARKEL, SINCE THIS IS YOUR DECK AND NOT "SOMEONE ELSE'S", I read up on a few things, and l think you should, possibly, consider dimensional alchemist. What do you think? Maybe side it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saiyan Knight Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 I almost WISH I was itching for a flame. The fact of the matter is that you have no expertise in the area, yet you're throwing your two cents down for the sheer fact that you can. Whether you're offended or not, whether you like it or not, whether you REALIZE IT or not, what you have to say about this is completely worthless. After reading some of your lists and the statement "You have Allure, so why NOT Necroface!? 8D", I mean, what else can I conceivably surmise? Realistically speaking. @Deck at hand: Anyway, regardless, considering you have TWO Terraforming along with THREE Future Visions, it's almost 100% assured that you'll be having dead Spells in the hand. I'd try to incorporate a discard outlet to make use of those otherwise useless cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Dahlia Posted November 18, 2009 Report Share Posted November 18, 2009 You wanna know what you can concievably surmise? You can keep your thoughts to yourself. What l do is none of your business. Do you hear me calling you a "Small, egotistical, hype-because-he-knows-one-deck-l-have-no-prior-experience-with-n00bie?" Do you? No. Because i'm not a troll. And if you decide that you want to continue, l will neg and report you. Focus on the deck and not MY comments: It's not my deck. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.